Document Detail


An empirical approach to the New Zealand government's review of the coronial jurisdiction.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24804531     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Given the public profile of New Zealand coroners, it is surprising that there has been limited empirical research about coroners' decision-making. This article uses evidence from New Zealand's first empirical study of coroners' recommendations to discuss the New Zealand government's recent review of the coronial jurisdiction. In June and October 2013, New Zealand's Courts Minister announced proposed changes to the coronial system. Several of the Minister's proposals are consistent with the empirical evidence, but there are also significant gaps in the review. The Minister's review acknowledges the importance of coroners' preventive function, but will the proposals enable New Zealand's coronial law to achieve its full preventive potential? The empirical evidence suggests that the prophylactic potential of coroners' recommendations is not being maximised.
Authors:
Jennifer Moore
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of law and medicine     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1320-159X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Law Med     Publication Date:  2014 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-05-08     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9431853     Medline TA:  J Law Med     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  602-26     Citation Subset:  IM    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Coronial law and practice: a human rights perspective.
Next Document:  An absurd inconsistency in law: Nicklinson's case and deciding to die.