| The effects of receiver placement on probe microphone, performance, and subjective measures with open canal hearing instruments. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20388451 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
BACKGROUND: Open canal hearing instruments differ in method of sound delivery to the ear canal, distance between the microphone and the receiver, and physical size of the devices. Moreover, RITA (receiver in the aid) and RITE (receiver in the ear) hearing instruments may also differ in terms of retention and comfort as well as ease of use and care for certain individuals. What remains unclear, however, is if any or all of the abovementioned factors contribute to hearing aid outcome. PURPOSE: To determine the effect of receiver location on performance and/or preference of listeners using open canal hearing instruments. RESEARCH DESIGN: An experimental study in which subjects were exposed to a repeated measures design. STUDY SAMPLE: Twenty-five adult listeners with mild sloping to moderately severe sensorineural hearing loss (mean age 67 yr). DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Participants completed two six-week trial periods for each device type. Probe microphone, objective, and subjective measures (quiet, noise) were conducted unaided and aided at the end of each trial period. RESULTS: Occlusion effect results were not significantly different between the RITA and RITE instruments; however, frequency range was extended in the RITE instruments, resulting in significantly greater maximum gain for the RITE instruments than the RITA instruments at 4000 and 6000 Hz. Objective performance in quiet or in noise was unaffected by receiver location. Subjective measures revealed significantly greater satisfaction ratings for the RITE than for the RITA instruments. Similarly, preference in quiet and overall preference were significantly greater for the RITE than for the RITA instruments. CONCLUSIONS: Although no occlusion differences were noted between instruments, the RITE did demonstrate a significant difference in reserve gain before feedback at 4000 and 6000 Hz. Objectively; no positive benefit was noted between unaided and aided conditions on speech recognition tests. These results suggest that such testing may not be sensitive enough to determine aided benefit with open canal instruments. However, the subjective measures (Abbreviated Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit [APHAB] and subjective ratings) did indicate aided benefit for both instruments when compared to unaided. This further suggests the clinical importance of subjective measures as a way to measure aided benefit of open-fit devices. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Lynzee N Alworth; Patrick N Plyler; Monika Bertges Reber; Patti M Johnstone |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of the American Academy of Audiology Volume: 21 ISSN: 1050-0545 ISO Abbreviation: J Am Acad Audiol Publication Date: 2010 Apr |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-04-14 Completed Date: 2010-06-24 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9114646 Medline TA: J Am Acad Audiol Country: Canada |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 249-66 Citation Subset: IM |
Copyright Information:
|
American Academy of Audiology. |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Audiology and Speech Pathology, University of Tennessee, 578 South Stadium Hall, Knoxville, TN 37996-0740, USA. lalworth@utk.edu |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Aged Auditory Perception / physiology* Cochlear Microphonic Potentials / physiology* Ear Canal Equipment Design Female Hearing Aids* Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / diagnosis, physiopathology, rehabilitation* Hearing Tests / instrumentation* Humans Male Perceptual Masking / physiology Questionnaires Task Performance and Analysis |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Reception thresholds for sentences in quiet and noise for monolingual English and bilingual Mandarin...
Next Document: Comparison of traditional bone-conduction hearing AIDS with the Baha system.