Document Detail


The effectiveness of opposing expert witnesses for educating jurors about unreliable expert evidence.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17940854     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
We tested whether an opposing expert is an effective method of educating jurors about scientific validity by manipulating the methodological quality of defense expert testimony and the type of opposing prosecution expert testimony (none, standard, addresses the other expert's methodology) within the context of a written trial transcript. The presence of opposing expert testimony caused jurors to be skeptical of all expert testimony rather than sensitizing them to flaws in the other expert's testimony. Jurors rendered more guilty verdicts when they heard opposing expert testimony than when opposing expert testimony was absent, regardless of whether the opposing testimony addressed the methodology of the original expert or the validity of the original expert's testimony. Thus, contrary to the assumptions in the Supreme Court's decision in Daubert, opposing expert testimony may not be an effective safeguard against junk science in the courtroom.
Authors:
Lora M Levett; Margaret Bull Kovera
Related Documents :
3413674 - A lexicon for the expert witness and defendant.
18406254 - Androgen excess disorders in women.
12197254 - Afterword to krazy: george herriman's krazy kat cartoon and its appeal to e. e. cummings.
20827894 - The taboo of politics in pastoral counseling.
20054074 - Faculty ethics: ideal principles with practical applications.
22314944 - Global climate change and body functions.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't     Date:  2007-10-17
Journal Detail:
Title:  Law and human behavior     Volume:  32     ISSN:  0147-7307     ISO Abbreviation:  Law Hum Behav     Publication Date:  2008 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-07-09     Completed Date:  2008-09-25     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7801255     Medline TA:  Law Hum Behav     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  363-74     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Criminology, Law, and Society, University of Florida, Box 115950, Gainesville, FL 32611-5950, USA. llevett@ufl.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Expert Testimony / legislation & jurisprudence*
Humans

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Korean mistletoe lectin (KML-IIU) and its subchains induce nitric oxide (NO) production in murine ma...
Next Document:  Cardiac electrophysiological characteristics of the mdx ( 5cv ) mouse model of Duchenne muscular dys...