| The effect of surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts on adhesion of a resin-based luting agent. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 20493325 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
STATEMENT OF PROBLEM: Surface treatment of fiber-reinforced posts may not always increase adhesion, especially on the post/resin-based luting agent interface, which is a weaker interface than the dentin/adhesive interface. PURPOSE: The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the influence of different post surface treatments on the bond strength of a luting agent to a fiber post. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Sixty-eight fiber-reinforced posts (D. T. Light-Post) were divided into 4 groups and treated with 1 of the following surface treatment procedures: no treatment (NS) (control), silanization (SA) (Monobond-S), airborne-particle abrasion (AB) (Airsonic Alu-Oxyd), or silanization subsequent to airborne-particle abrasion (AB plus SA). Specimens were bonded with dual-polymerizing resin-based luting material (Variolink II) and stored in water at 37 degrees C for 24 hours. Shear bond strength (MPa) was measured using a universal testing machine. Data were analyzed with 1-way ANOVA and the multiple comparisons Scheffé test with Bonferroni correction (alpha=.05). RESULTS: Shear bond strength of the luting agent to the post was significantly affected by surface treatment (P<.05). Treating the surface of the post with airborne-particle abrasion resulted in a significantly higher bond strength compared with other treatments. There was no significant difference in bond strength between the silanization group and the no treatment group or the silanization plus airborne-particle abrasion group. CONCLUSIONS: Airborne-particle abrasion provided a significant increase in bond strength between the post and the luting agent evaluated, without additional treatments. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Yunjung Choi; Ahran Pae; Eun-Jin Park; Robert F Wright |
Related Documents
:
|
9576325 - Retentive strengths of cast gold crowns using glass ionomer, compomer, or resin cement. 10515145 - Comparison of bracket debonding force between two conventional resin adhesives and a re... 11151575 - Surface analysis of machined versus sandblasted and acid-etched titanium implants. 10920565 - The force levels required to mechanically debond ceramic brackets: an in vitro comparat... 3232585 - Augmentation rhinoplasty. 17946365 - Wearable wireless telemetry system for implantable bio-mems sensors. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: The Journal of prosthetic dentistry Volume: 103 ISSN: 1097-6841 ISO Abbreviation: J Prosthet Dent Publication Date: 2010 Jun |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2010-05-24 Completed Date: 2010-08-30 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 0376364 Medline TA: J Prosthet Dent Country: United States |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 362-8 Citation Subset: D; IM |
Copyright Information:
|
Copyright 2010 The Editorial Council of the Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved. |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Dental Prosthodontics, School of Medicine, Ewha Womans University, Seoul, Korea. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Adhesiveness Air Abrasion, Dental Analysis of Variance Composite Resins Dental Bonding* Dental Cements Dental Prosthesis Retention* Dental Stress Analysis Glass Post and Core Technique* Resin Cements* Shear Strength Silanes Surface Properties Tooth, Nonvital / rehabilitation* |
| Chemical | |
Reg. No./Substance:
|
0/Composite Resins; 0/Dental Cements; 0/Monobond S; 0/Resin Cements; 0/Silanes; 0/fiberglass; 179240-22-3/Variolink |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: The effect of acid etchant type and dentin location on tubular density and dimension.
Next Document: Evaluation of a one-piece milled zirconia post and core with different post-and-core systems: An in ...