Document Detail


The effect of stimulating versus conventional perineural catheters on postoperative analgesia following ultrasound-guided femoral nerve localization.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22137514     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
STUDY OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that, if the femoral nerve is correctly localized using ultrasound (US) guidance, the type of perineural catheter used has no effect on catheter success.
DESIGN: Randomized controlled trial.
SETTING: Post-anesthesia care unit of an academic teaching hospital.
PATIENTS: 40 ASA physical status 1, 2, and 3 patients, ages 55-85 years, undergoing elective total knee arthroplasty.
INTERVENTIONS: All patients received postoperative continuous femoral nerve blocks and a single injection sciatic nerve block. Nerve localization was accomplished using US guidance and electrical nerve stimulation so that the needle tip was visualized deep to the femoral nerve. Patients were randomized to receive either stimulating (Group SC) or nonstimulating catheters (Group NSC) in the usual manner for each device. Catheters were bolused with ropivacaine and an infusion commenced.
MEASUREMENTS: The primary outcome was quality of analgesia (as measured by a numerical rating scale). Other outcomes included sensory block success rate, number of attempts and time required to localize the needle tip correctly, number of attempts and time required to place the perineural catheter, amount of local anesthetic and opioid use postoperatively, and degree of completion of preset postoperative rehabilitation goals.
MAIN RESULTS: Quality of analgesia was similar at all time intervals. Rates of successful femoral block (95% vs 80%; P = 0.34) were similar between groups. Time required to position the catheter was greater in Group SC than Group NSC (3.45 ± 2.05 min vs 1.72 ± 0.88 min; P < 0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Ultrasound guidance for needle localization prior to catheter insertion for femoral nerve block results in similar block characteristics between stimulating and nonstimulating catheters. The use of nonstimulating catheters avoids the technical challenges of stimulating catheters and does not require additional helpers.
Authors:
Kishor Gandhi; Danielle M Lindenmuth; Admir Hadzic; Daquan Xu; Vijay S Patel; Thomas J Maliakal; Jeff C Gadsden
Related Documents :
21558074 - Neurocognitive function in patients with recurrent glioblastoma treated with bevacizumab.
21454084 - Comparison of mandibular vertical growth in hemifacial microsomia patients treated with...
21378994 - Prolene frontalis suspension in paediatric ptosis.
21121784 - Long-term results of gamma knife surgery for optic nerve sheath meningioma.
22130494 - Arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder in adolescent athletes participating in over...
2116544 - Evaluation of branched-chain amino acid intake in children with maple syrup urine disea...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of clinical anesthesia     Volume:  23     ISSN:  1873-4529     ISO Abbreviation:  J Clin Anesth     Publication Date:  2011 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-12-05     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8812166     Medline TA:  J Clin Anesth     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  626-31     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011. Published by Elsevier Inc.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Anesthesia management of totally endoscopic atrial septal defect repair with a robotic surgical syst...
Next Document:  Cost-effectiveness analysis of flexible optical scopes for tracheal intubation: a descriptive compar...