Document Detail


The effect of debris accumulation on and filter resistance to airflow for four commercially available vacuum cleaners.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19360515     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Mortar removal with right-angle grinders can cause excessive exposure to respirable crystalline silica. To control this dust exposure, vacuum cleaners need to exhaust 2.3 m(3)/min (80 cubic feet per minute) from the grinder's exhaust hood. Maintaining this airflow while collecting as much as 15.9 kg (35 lb) of debris in the vacuum cleaner has been problematic. A laboratory study was conducted to evaluate how mortar debris affects vacuum cleaner airflow and filter pressure loss. Four vacuum cleaners were tested. Two of the vacuum cleaners used vacuum cleaner bags as a prefilter; the other two vacuum cleaners used cyclones to reduce the amount of debris that reaches the filter. Test debris was collected by a masonry restoration contractor during actual mortar removal using a grinder fitted with a hood. The hood is attached to a vacuum cleaner with cyclonic pre-separation. The vacuum cleaner fan curves were obtained experimentally to learn how pressure loss affects vacuum cleaner airflows. Then, 15.9 kg (35 lb) of mortar removal debris was sucked into the vacuum cleaner in 2.27-kg (5-lb) increments. Before and after adding each 2.27-kg (5-lb) increment of debris, vacuum cleaner airflows were measured with a venturi meter, and vacuum cleaner static pressures were measured at the inlet to the vacuum cleaner motor, and before and after each filter. The vacuum cleaners equipped with cyclonic pre-separation were unaffected by the mass of debris collected in the vacuum cleaner and were able to maintain airflows in excess of 1.98 m(3)/min (70 cfm) throughout the testing program. As debris accumulated in the vacuum cleaners that used bags, airflow decreased from 2.3 m(3)/min (80 cfm) to as little as 0.85 m(3)/min (30 cfm). This airflow loss is caused by the increased airflow resistance of the bags that increased from less 0.03 kPa/m(3)/min (0.1 inches of water per cfm) to 16.7 kPa/m(3)/min (1.9 inches of water/cfm). Apparently, vacuum cleaners using bags should be used in applications where adequate dust control can be achieved at airflows less than 0.85 m(3)/min (30 cfm). Vacuum cleaners with cyclonic pre-separators provided superior and cost-effective dust control compared with vacuums with bags when dust loading was high and when more than 30 cfm of airflow is needed for dust control.
Authors:
William A Heitbrink; Javier Santalla-Elias
Related Documents :
19846365 - Microbubble-size dependence of focused ultrasound-induced blood-brain barrier opening i...
17839615 - Metastable superheated ice in liquid-water inclusions under high negative pressure.
8295225 - A gas monitoring system for ethylene oxide sterilizers with constant sample flow throug...
8863275 - Self-association of nicotinamide in aqueous solution: light-scattering and vapor pressu...
18950555 - Is hypertension an immunologic disease?
17255865 - Guideline implementation results in a decrease of pressure ulcer incidence in criticall...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Evaluation Studies; Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of occupational and environmental hygiene     Volume:  6     ISSN:  1545-9632     ISO Abbreviation:  J Occup Environ Hyg     Publication Date:  2009 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-04-10     Completed Date:  2009-06-22     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101189458     Medline TA:  J Occup Environ Hyg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  374-84     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Occupational and Environmental Health, College of Public Health, The University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52241, USA. williamheitbrink@uiowa.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Air Movements*
Construction Materials
Dust / prevention & control*
Environmental Monitoring
Equipment Design
Filtration / instrumentation*
Occupational Exposure / prevention & control*
Occupational Health
Particle Size
Grant Support
ID/Acronym/Agency:
U54-OH0083007/OH/NIOSH CDC HHS
Chemical
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Dust

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Evaluation of nitrite contamination in baby foods and infant formulas marketed in Turkey.
Next Document:  Placebo response in the treatment of women's sexual dysfunctions: a review and commentary.