Document Detail


The early work-up for isolated ligamentous injury of the cervical spine: does computed tomography scan have a role?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16374279     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Helical computed tomography (HCT) scan is the preferred modality for diagnosing fractures of the cervical spine in blunt trauma. We hypothesize that HCT can be used as a screening tool for isolated ligamentous injury (LI) in blunt trauma. METHODS: A prospective, consecutive series study design was used to include patients that could not have their cervical spine cleared clinically. All patients underwent HCT (occiput-T1) and plain radiographs (PR) with five views of the cervical spine. Patients with clinical or radiographic abnormalities without fracture underwent cervical magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). Demographic and outcome data were collected. The attending radiologist's interpretation was used for clinical management. Three neuroradiologists in a blinded fashion re-reviewed the studies (HCT, PR, and MRI) of the MRI subgroup. RESULTS: One thousand five hundred seventy-seven patients met the study criteria. Two hundred seventy-eight had 416 cervical spine fractures. PR failed to identify 299 of 416 (72%) cervical spine fractures in 208 of 278 (74.8%) patients. Of the 1,299 (82%) patients who had no fracture, 85 (6.5%) required an MRI. The mean time from admission to MRI was 3 days for the LI subgroup. Of these, 21 of 85 (25%) had LI by MRI. Seven of 21 (33.3%) patients had an abnormal HCT versus 3 of 21 (14.3%) patients who had an abnormal PR. Four of 85 (4.7%) patients had spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality. One (1.2%) patient required surgical stabilization of LI, as seen on all studies performed (PR, HCT, and MRI). Sensitivities for PR and HCT for LI were 16% and 32%, respectively. Negative predictive values for PR and HCT for LI were 74% and 78%, respectively. Measurements of interrater reliability for MRI, HCT, and PR had kappa values of 0.60, 0.14, and 0.41, respectively. CONCLUSION: HCT is the most sensitive, specific, and cost-effective modality for screening the cervical spine bony injuries, but it is not an effective modality for screening for cervical LI. MRI is clearly superior to HCT for LI. The indications for MRI include abnormalities on HCT, neurologic deficits, cervical pain or tenderness on examination, or the inability to clear the cervical spine in the obtunded patient. With the current state of the art technology, we have redefined the definition of spinal cord injury without radiographic abnormality to include spinal cord injuries without boney injuries or LI.
Authors:
Jose J Diaz; Joseph M Aulino; Bryan Collier; Christopher Roman; Addison K May; Richard S Miller; Oscar Guillamondegui; John A Morris
Related Documents :
17846269 - Associations between cervical cord gray matter damage and disability in patients with m...
3801359 - Magnetic resonance imaging--its application to cervical carcinoma.
12185049 - Brachial plexus sonography: a technique for assessing the root level.
1582119 - Multiple cervical cord compressions in psoriatic arthritis.
1464919 - The role and limitations of computed tomographic scanning in the evaluation of cervical...
1407529 - Ct and mri in hydatid disease of cervical vertebrae.
8574049 - Ex vivo evaluation of ferromagnetism, heating, and artifacts of breast tissue expanders...
22018879 - Longitudinal analysis of t1ρ and t2 quantitative mri of knee cartilage laminar organiz...
8227579 - Apparent vascular occlusion on cranial tof mra with peripheral presaturation technique.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of trauma     Volume:  59     ISSN:  0022-5282     ISO Abbreviation:  J Trauma     Publication Date:  2005 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-12-23     Completed Date:  2006-01-19     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376373     Medline TA:  J Trauma     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  897-903; discussion 903-4     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology and Radiological Sciences, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, Tennessee 37212, USA. jose.diaz@vanderbilt.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Cervical Vertebrae / injuries*,  radiography
Female
Humans
Injury Severity Score
Ligaments / injuries*,  radiography
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Male
Middle Aged
Prospective Studies
Spinal Fractures / classification,  radiography*
Tomography, Spiral Computed / economics*
Wounds, Nonpenetrating / classification,  radiography*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Prospective comparison of bronchoalveolar lavage and quantitative deep tracheal aspirate in the diag...
Next Document:  Esophageal dysfunction in cervical spinal cord injury: a potentially important mechanism of aspirati...