Document Detail

The current role of the artificial urinary sphincter for the treatment of urinary incontinence.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  16006857     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
PURPOSE: The introduction of the artificial urinary sphincter (AUS) in 1972 was heralded as a revolution for the treatment of genuine stress incontinence. Initial enthusiasm was tempered by disappointment as complications occurred. The device has now been in routine clinical use for more than 30 years, and the indications and surgical principles involved in its use along with short-term and long-term outcomes are more clearly defined. Hence, we reviewed the literature to clarify the role of the AUS and offer a possible solution to its problems in the guise of a new sphincter. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A MEDLINE search was performed and all articles relating to the role of the AUS for the treatment of urinary incontinence were reviewed. RESULTS: The AMS 800 (American Medical Systems, Minnetonka, Minnesota) provides urinary continence in 73% of cases (range 61% to 96%) and it has a complication rate of 12% (range 3% to 33%) for mechanical failure, 4.5% to 67% for early infection/erosion, 15% for late erosion and 7% for delayed recurrent incontinence. The literature supports the role of the AUS as an important and reliable treatment modality for stress urinary incontinence and intrinsic sphincter deficiency. However, it is not suitable in all patients and its use for the management of hypermobility is controversial. Hence, careful patient selection according to indication is required with full preoperative counseling. CONCLUSIONS: Despite its reliability for achieving urinary continence the AMS 800 is not perfect. Newer devices, such as that being developed at our institution, may offer improved outcomes and decreased complication rates.
Mahreen Hussain; Tamsin J Greenwell; Suzie N Venn; Anthony R Mundy
Related Documents :
17280607 - Quantifying the natural history of post-radical prostatectomy incontinence using object...
16969617 - Prospective randomized trial comparing stapled hemorrhoidopexy versus closed ferguson h...
15627777 - Randomized comparison of burch urethropexy procedures concomitant with gynecologic oper...
906887 - The stress-related emotional lability syndrome. ii. a multicentre evaluation of orap.
17138077 - Impact of intraoperative transesophageal echocardiography during noncardiac surgery.
20435567 - Pharmacokinetics of cefuroxime in traumatic wound secretion and antibacterial activity ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Journal of urology     Volume:  174     ISSN:  0022-5347     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Urol.     Publication Date:  2005 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2005-07-11     Completed Date:  2005-09-16     Revised Date:  2005-11-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0376374     Medline TA:  J Urol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  418-24     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Institute of Urology and Nephrology, University College London, London, United Kingdom.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Patient Selection
Prosthesis Design
Treatment Outcome
Urinary Incontinence / surgery*
Urinary Sphincter, Artificial* / contraindications

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  An unusual burn injury caused by a car battery.
Next Document:  Measuring the quality of care for localized prostate cancer.