Document Detail


A cost-effectiveness analysis of infrainguinal bypass in the absence of great saphenous vein conduit.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23395205     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Good-quality great saphenous vein (GSV) is the preferred conduit for infrainguinal surgical revascularizations, but it is not available in all patients. We sought to identify the alternative conduit that would maximize cost-effectiveness in the context of infrapopliteal bypass for critical limb ischemia and nonhealing foot wounds. METHODS: A Markov model was used to create a detailed simulation of 10-year outcomes in a hypothetical Edifoligide for the Prevention of Infrainguinal Vein Graft Failure (PREVENT) III-type patient cohort undergoing infrainguinal bypass for nonhealing foot wounds. The following management options were evaluated: (1) conservative therapy (local wound care, amputation as needed); (2) primary amputation; (3) bypass with autologous alternative vein (AAV), including arm or lesser saphenous vein; (4) bypass with GSV <3 mm in diameter; (5) bypass with polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE); (6) cryopreserved venous allograft; and (7) cryopreserved arterial allograft. Estimates of 10-year total costs were incorporated into the model. Cost-effectiveness was measured in terms of incremental United States dollars per additional year of ambulation. RESULTS: Bypass with AAV had the highest effectiveness as measured in median years of ambulation. After primary amputation, bypass with PTFE had the lowest total costs. With incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of $5325 and $21,228, bypass with PTFE or AAV appeared to be cost-effective alternatives to conservative therapy for nonhealing ischemic wounds. Primary amputation, GSV <3 mm, and allograft options were dominated (ie, more costly and less effective). Primary amputation was weakly dominated. CONCLUSIONS: Bypass with PTFE or AAV appears to be a cost-effective option for the management of critical limb ischemia and nonhealing foot wounds when good-quality GSV is not available.
Authors:
Neal R Barshes; C Keith Ozaki; Panos Kougias; Michael Belkin
Related Documents :
24619135 - Clinical experience with the preset stent retriever for the treatment of acute ischemic...
19079315 - Reduced-intensity conditioning for severe aplasia using fludarabine and cy followed by ...
24618175 - A large italian observational multicentre study on vascular ulcers of the lower limbs (...
23200175 - Selumetinib plus docetaxel for kras-mutant advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a rando...
8434515 - Continuous irrigation-drainage of the subdural space for the treatment of chronic subdu...
23207175 - A randomized, single-center study of equivalence of 2 intraocular lenses used in catara...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-2-6
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of vascular surgery     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1097-6809     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Vasc. Surg.     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-2-11     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8407742     Medline TA:  J Vasc Surg     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Division of Vascular Surgery and Endovascular Therapy, Michael E. Debakey Department of Surgery, Baylor College of Medicine/Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center, Houston, Tex. Electronic address: nbarshes@bcm.tmc.edu.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Risk prediction of 30-day readmission after infrainguinal bypass for critical limb ischemia.
Next Document:  Hybrid repair of aortic arch dissections.