Document Detail

The correlation of prenatal zinc concentration and deficiency with anthropometric factors.
Jump to Full Text
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24971129     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To determine the status of serum zinc in pregnant women in different gestational ages and correlation with socio-demographic and anthropometric factors in Iranian women referring to prenatal care public health clinics.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: We analyzed the zinc concentrations in plasma samples obtained at different gestational ages from 961 women and recorded BMI at the first trimester in pregnant women who were screened for a trial designed to evaluate the zinc concentration. Subjects were from different socio economical backgrounds and attended public health clinics for their prenatal care. All analyses were performed by SPSS (version 16). P values < 0.05 were considered significant.
RESULTS: The results showed that after plasma zinc concentrations were adjusted with Parity, weight (early pregnancy), BMI (at early pregnancy), age and educational statues. Plasma zinc deficiency declined as gestational age progressed, however it was not significant. There was no significant correlation between zinc concentration, anthropometric, method of contraception and socio factors. However, there were significant relation between parity (p = 0.007) and weight at early pregnancy (p= 0.039) with serum zinc levels.
CONCLUSION: We conclude that plasma zinc concentrations decreased during the late first trimester to the early third trimester and with parity. These findings may indicate that the deficient levels of zinc in the latter third of pregnancy suggest a tendency for insufficient maternal nutrition. However larger studies are required to support this finding.
Authors:
Parichehr Hanachi; Mansoreh Norrozi; Rayhaneh Miri Moosavi
Related Documents :
998679 - Urinary amine alterations in drug-addiction pregnancy.
2487909 - Prenatal diagnosis of congenital uropathies.
4301689 - Routine multipurpose gas chromatographic assay for urinary corticosteroids.
7847529 - Renal elimination of ceftazidime during pregnancy.
3536979 - Renal prostacyclin and thromboxane in normotensive and preeclamptic pregnant women and ...
23623199 - Assessment of angiogenic markers and female sex hormone receptors in pregnancy tumor of...
20495989 - Attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder in the offspring following prenatal maternal b...
12974059 - Ultrasound derived fetal growth curves for a jamaican population.
17555719 - A retrospective fetal ultrasound study of brain size in autism.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of family & reproductive health     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1735-8949     ISO Abbreviation:  J Family Reprod Health     Publication Date:  2014 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-06-27     Completed Date:  2014-06-27     Revised Date:  2014-06-30    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101496684     Medline TA:  J Family Reprod Health     Country:  Iran    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  21-6     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Full Text
Journal Information
Journal ID (nlm-ta): J Family Reprod Health
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): J Family Reprod Health
Journal ID (publisher-id): JFRH
ISSN: 1735-8949
ISSN: 1735-9392
Publisher: Tehran University of Medical Sciences
Article Information
Download PDF
Copyright © Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences
open-access:
Received Month: 8 Year: 2013
Revision Received Month: 9 Year: 2013
Accepted Month: 9 Year: 2013
Print publication date: Month: 3 Year: 2014
Volume: 8 Issue: 1
First Page: 21 Last Page: 26
PubMed Id: 24971129
ID: 4064761
Publisher Id: JFRH-8-021

The Correlation of Prenatal Zinc Concentration and Deficiency with Anthropometric Factors
Parichehr Hanachi, Ph.D.1
Mansoreh Norrozi, M.Sc.2
Rayhaneh Miri Moosavi, M.Sc.1
1Department of Biology, Biochemistry Unite, Faculty of Basic Sciences, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran
2Valie Asr Reproductive Health Research Center, Tehran University of Medical Science, Tehran, Iran
Correspondence: Correspondence: Dr. Parichehr Hanachi, Faculty of Basic Science, Biology Department, Biochemistry unite, Alzahra University, Tehran, Iran. Email: hanachi_wrc@yahoo.com

Introduction

It has long been known that zinc is an important trace element which has a major role in a number of biochemical reactions and systems in human body. It is necessary for the functioning of more than 300 different enzymes and plays a vital role in an enormous number of biological processes. The effects of zinc on maternal health and pregnancy outcomes have been studied in multiple observational and interventional studies. Studies linked the zinc deficiency with a wide range of complications including pregnancy induced hypertension, hemorrhage, infections, intrauterine growth retardation, low birth weight, congenital anomalies and increased neonatal morbidity (1).

The importance of zinc in pregnancy is due to its role in DNA and protein synthesis and as a result thenecessity of its availability for the appropriate growth and development of the fetus and neonate (2). Zinc deficiency, in addition to reducing cell proliferation, protein synthesis, or rate of tubule polymerization, decreases growth in embryonic and fetal periods (3).

Zinc nutriure of pregnant women has been assessed by measuring maternal zinc concentrations in plasma or serum, leukocytes, erythrocytes, and amniotic fluid as well as by other indexes including dietary zinc intake (410). Pregnant women are facing zinc deficiency more than the other groups, due to having fetus which need zinc for its proper growth (11). Higher age, lactation, alcoholism, and high consumption of iron, and folic acid, increase the risk of zinc deficiency (11, 12). Other researches have shown that the fetus grown by zinc deficiency is end up with abnormalities in central nervous systems (13, 14). In another study done on the zinc deficient pregnant women, it was indicated that congenital abnormalities, prolonged pregnancy, abnormal tasting sense, and other difficulties were seen in such subjects (14). Evidences suggest that zinc deficiency is one of the important problems within the developed and developing countries (15). Zinc deficiency in human was reported for the first time in 1961 (16). In 1991, a report was published which emphasized the importance of zinc and also indicated that in countries such as Iran, Egypt, Turkey, China, Yugoslavia, and Canada, due to low consumption of red meat, and high consumption of fiber, zinc deficiency was seen quiet often. A separate study in 2001 indicated that using supplementary zinc materials by pregnant mother, increased newborn birth weight, and decreased the mortality rate (17). The aim of this study was to investigate the relations between plasma zinc concentrations, socio-demographic and anthropometric factors during pregnancy.


Materials and methods

This research was an analytical- descriptive study, which was conducted on 961 pregnant, between January 2009 and December 2011. Subjects were mostly from low socioeconomic backgrounds and attended public health clinics for their prenatal care. For each participant a questionnaire was provided which contained the following items: mother age, weigh (at the first trimester), height, gestational age, number of deliveries, last method of contraception, occupation and educational statues. Written informed consent was obtained from all subjects. The participants had no history of systemic, cardiovascular, proliferative, or endocrine diseases, neoplasm, and anemia. They did not smoke or consume alcohol and were not addicted to illicit drugs. Also, they did not use any medications except for acid folic (1 mg) and Ferrous sulfate (50 mg elemental iron) since the beginning of the second trimester.

In this study, gestational age was calculated at the beginning of the study based on the first day of last menstrual period and height of fundus. If a woman did not remember the first day of her last menstrual period or her height of fundus differed with her gestational age for more than two weeks, ultrasound was employed to accurately determine the gestational age (less than 20 weeks).

The blood was collected and allowed to clot for 20 minutes and consecutively centrifuged at 3000 × g for 10 min. We analyzed the zinc concentrations in plasma samples obtained at different gestational age. We divided mothers according to age to different groups, (≤19 years), (20-24 years), (25-29 years), (30-34 years) and (≥35 years). The trial was reviewed and approved by Ethical Committee of Reproductive Health Research Center, Imam Hospital in Tehran, Iran, and each subject or guardian provided signed, informed consent. We also divided mothers according to number of deliveries to three groups, nullipara, primipara and multipara.

Body composition analyzer

Height was measured in the upright position with stadiometer. Weight, BMI measured with body composition analyzer (Inbody 3.0, Biospace Co, Ltd. KOREA) at the first trimester.

Zinc concentration assay

Serum Zinc levels were estimated using kit supplied following established literature procedures by Randox, Co kit, UK. The principle of this kit is when the Zinc present in the sample is chelated by 5-Br-PAPS-2-(5-bromo-2-pyridylazo)-5-(N-propyl-N-sulfopropylamino) -phenol in the regent. The formation of this complex is measured at a wavelength of 550 nm spectrophotometer, Cecil, CE, 2501 model, 2000, series (18, 19, 20).

Sample size

Sample size adequate for estimating the prevalence of ZD was computed using single proportion sample size calculation formula with the inputs of 95% confidence level, 5% of margin of error, design effect of 2, non-response rate of 10% and expected prevalence of ZD of 72% (20). Accordingly, sample size of n= 920 was computed. However, in order to maximize the sample size for the analytic study component, n= 750 pregnant women were included in the study. The adequacy of the sample size for investigating the key determinants of ZD (parity, maternal age, and gestational age) was assessed via double proportion sample size calculation formula using an online application (21).

Data analysis

Data entry, screening and analysis were carried out by using SPSS 17.0. Descriptive analysis was done using mean, frequency and percentage. Independent t-test, bivariate correlations and one-way Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) used to compare serum zinc levels across categories of independent variables. The association between a determining factor was considered to be significant at p <0.0.


Results

As Table 1 shows, the age, primiparous, weight, height, body mass index at the gestational age on routine pregnancy. Moreover, all groups did not differ significantly by gestational age screening of pregnancy.

The mean zinc level for gestational age of ≤11 wk, 12-19 wk and ≥20 wk were 91.02± 25.99,88.62± 27.06 and 88.70± 25.08 µg/dl respectively. The percentage of zinc deficiency level (<66 µgr/dl) for gestational age of ≤11 wk, 12-19 wk and ≥20 wk were 16.2%, 16 and 17.3 respectively. However there was not any relation between Zinc concentration and deficiency in different groups of gestational age.

Figure 1 represents changes in mean serum zinc concentration level of all participants at gestational age of the study. As this figure shows, the mean zinc level for gestational age of ≤ 10 wk, 11-20 wk, 21-30 wk and ≥31 wk were 91.92± 27.58, 88.71± 25.99 and 88.48± 25.43 and 88.57± 24.21µg/dl respectively. Serum zinc decreased at 11-20 to ≥31 wks of pregnancy. However, no significant correlation was noted between serum zinc concentration and the gestational week.

The prevalence of zinc concentration among the pregnant women was also studied according to the following items (Table 2): mother age divides to (≤19, 20-24, 25-29, 30-34 and ≥35 years), numbers of deliveries (0, 1 and ≥2). Results from this investigation indicated that there was no meaningful difference regarding Occupation (housekeeper and employed) and educational statues (≤5th grade, 6th -8th grade, 9th -12th grade and University). However, with number of parity the zinc concentration was decreased significantly (p< 0.05).

The Table 3 indicated the Correlation between variable measurements and serum zinc z scores. The results showed there were significant relation (p < 0.05) between number of parity and weight of participants at the early of pregnancy and serum zinc z score.


Discussion

Pregnancy is associated with increased demand of all the nutrients like Iron, Zinc and antioxidant and deficiency of any of these could affect pregnancy (19). In spite of the fact that zinc deficiency is prevalent in pregnant women in Iran. The results of our study also revealed that with increase number of parity and weight at early of pregnancy of participants serum zinc decreased. This finding is consistent with other investigations (22, 23).

In developing countries, socioeconomic status is a complex term generally used for defining social inequalities and usually measured by income/educational level/occupation/living accommodation.

This is quite understandable as educational attainment has been established as a social variable that often displays the largest socioeconomic influence (24) because it affects both income and occupation. Educated women are also more likely to understand public-health message (25) and to maintain high personal hygiene than less-educated women. Educated women also belong to high social class and have access to adequate medicare and nutrition during pregnancy.

The prevalence of zinc deficiency in the different age of pregnancy showed meaningful difference, and that was due to mothers increasing requirement for zinc. Without a proper nutritional requirement the person falls in the state of zinc deficiency. In this study, the zinc level was determined according to the number of deliveries, and although we expected that with increasing the number of deliveries the prevalence of zinc deficiency worsen, however we founded significant (p < 0.05) difference with parity and zinc concentration. In this study zinc deficiency was not influenced by mothers’ education level. This finding was consistent with other investigations (26). However, it is premature to recommend a reinforcement of routine zinc supplementation for healthy mothers (27).

In this study there were reverse relation between maternal weight (in first trimester) and serum zinc concentration. Previous studies conducted by Gebremedhin et al, 2011 also supported the finding.

The outcome of the study suggests that low level of nutrient in mothers is associated with frequency of pregnancies especially if it is less than 24 months (28).

In many developing countries, these physiologic changes can be aggravated by under-nutrition, leading to micronutrient deficiency states that can have disastrous consequences for both mothers and newborn infants. Although a marginal zinc intake during pregnancy plays an important role in the duration of gestation and is associated with increased risk of preterm and very preterm delivery, scientists are still debating the healthy levels of zinc needed in pregnant women (28, 29).

We conclude that plasma zinc concentrations during the late first trimester to the early third trimester and with parity decreased. These findings indicate deficient level of zinc in the latter third of pregnancy which suggest a tendency for insufficient maternal nutrition. This might be due to the reason that nutritional care is not well integrated into maternity services. In addition, the provision of nutrition education might not be effective in the absence of concurrent livelihood promotion strategies. Although zinc intake during pregnancy plays an important role in mothers health, further studies with larger sample sizes are recommended to obtain more reliable results.


Ethical Considerations

Ethical issues including plagiarism, informed consent, misconduct, data fabrication and/or falsification, double publication and/or submission, redundancy, etc. have been completely observed by the authors.


Acknowledgement

The authors wish to thank Tehran University of Medical Sciences to support this grant (registration no: 2719), all colleagues at Vali-e-Asr Reproductive Health Research Center and authorities of all affiliated biomedical laboratories.


References
1. Shah D,Sachdev HP. Effect of gestational zinc deficiency on pregnancy outcomes: Summary of observation studies and zinc supplementation trialsBr J NutrYear: 200185Suppl 21018
2. World Health OrganizationTrace elements in human nutrition and health [internet]Geneva Available from:http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/1996/9241561734_eng_fulltext.pdf.
3. Shah D,Sachdev HP,Cetin I,Berti C,Calabrese S. Role of micronutrients in the periconceptional periodHuman Reproduction UpdateYear: 201016809519567449
4. Swanson CA,King JC. Zinc and pregnancy outcomeAm J Clin NutrYear: 198746763713673925
5. Apgar J. Zinc and reproduction: an updateJ Nutr BiochemYear: 1992326678
6. Tamura T,Goldenberg RL. Zinc nutriture and pregnancy outcomeNutr ResYear: 19961613981
7. Meadows NJ,Ruse W,Smith MF,et al. Zinc and small babiesLancetYear: 198121135376118578
8. Simmer K,Punchard NA,Murphy G,Thompson RPH. Prostaglandin production and zinc depletion in human pregnancyPediatr ResYear: 1985196977004022677
9. Tamura T,Weekes EW,Birch R,Franklin JC,Cosper P,Davis RO,et al. Relationship between amniotic fluid and maternal blood nutrient levelsJ Perinat MedYear: 199422227347823263
10. Scholl TO,Hediger ML,Schall JI,Fisher RL,Khoo C-S. Low zinc intake during pregnancy: its association with preterm and verypreterm deliveryAm J Epidemiol.Year: 19931371115248317441
11. Shah D,Sachdev HP. Effect of gestational zinc deficiency on pregnancy outcomes: summary of observation studies and zinc supplementation trialsBr J NutrYear: 200185Suppl 2S101811509097
12. Burits CA,Ashwood ED. Tietz text book of clinical chemistryYear: 19942nd ed
13. Prasad AS. Zinc in human healthJ Trace ElemYear: 1998116387
14. Jameson S. Zinc status and pregnancy outcome in humansYear: 1982First EditionAlan R.Liss3952
15. Sanders WB,Sandstead HH. Zinc deficiency, A public health problem?Am J DischildYear: 199114585359
16. Prasad AS. Syndrome of iron deficiency, anemia, hepatic, hypogonadism, dwarfism and geophagiaAm J MedYear: 1961315324614488490
17. Osendarp SJ,Van Raaij JM,Darmstadt GL,Baqui AH,Hautvast JG,Fuchs GJ. Zinc supplementation during pregnancy and effects on growth and morbidity in low birth weight infants a randomized placebo controlled trialLancetYear: 200135710808511297959
18. Norrozi M,Borna S,Hanachi P,Faghyhzadeh S,Haghollahi F,Golkho Sh. Evaluation of Zinc Supplementation Effect on Fetal Outcomes in Pregnant Women with Lower-than-Median Serum Zinc ConcentrationJournal of Family and Reproductive HealthYear: 20126859
19. Hanachi P,Golkho S,Norrozi M. The association of serum Zinc levels with socio demographic factors, red and white blood cells count in pregnant womenJournal Applied ScienceYear: 20088467983
20. Abebe Y,Bogale A,Hambidge KM,Stoecker BJ,Arbide I,Teshome A,Krebs NF,Westcott JE,Bailey KB,Gibson RS. Inadequate intakes of dietary zinc among pregnant women from subsistence households in Sidama, Southern EthiopiaPublic Health NutrYear: 2008113798617610755
21. Pezzullo JC. Proportion Difference Power/Sample Size Calculation http://statpages.org/proppowr.html.
22. Hunt IF,Murphy NJ,Cleaver AE,Faraji B,Swendseid ME,Coulson AH,et al. Zinc supplementation during pregnancy: zinc concentration of serum and hair from low-income women of Mexican descentAm J Clin NutrYear: 198537572826837492
23. Tuttle S,Aggett PJ,Campbell D,MacGillivray I. Zinc and copper nutrition in human pregnancy: a longitudinal study in normal primigravidae and in primigravidae at risk of delivering a growth retarded babyAm J Clin NutrYear: 1985411032413993606
24. Andersen AMN,Mortensen LH. Socioeconomic inequality in birth outcomes: what do the indicators tell us, and where do we find the dataCMAJYear: 200617414293016682710
25. Ugwuja EI,Ugwu NC. Helicobacter pylori in uninvestigated dyspepsia in primary health cares in Abakaliki, NigeriaOnline J Health Allied SciYear: 20071410
26. Salimi S,Yaghmaei M,Joshaghani HR,Mansourian AR. Study of Zinc Deficiency in Pregnant WomenIranian J Publ HealthYear: 2004331518
27. King JC. Determinants of maternal zinc status during pregnancyAm J Clin NutrYear: 200071suppl1334S10799411
28. Gebremedhin S,Enquselassie F,Umeta M. Prevalence of prenatal zinc deficiency and its association with socio-demographic, dietary and health care related factors in Rural Sidama, Southern Ethiopia: A cross-sectional studyBMC Public HealthYear: 20111189822126192
29. Goldenberg RL,Tamura T,Neggers Y,Copper RL,Johnston KE,Dubard MB,et al. The effect of zinc supplementation on pregnancy outcomeJAMAYear: 19959463687629954

Figures

[Figure ID: F0001]
Figure 1 

Changes in mean serum zinc concentration level of all participants at different gestational ages. Data are expressed as mean± SD



Tables
[TableWrap ID: T0001] Table 1 

Characteristics of subjects by gestational age at screening (mean± SD)


≤ 11 wk n = 235 12-19 wk n = 301 ≥20 wk n = 425 p value
Age (year) (mean± SD)* 26.22± 4.46 26.59± 4.43 26.46± 4.80 Non-significant
primiparous (%)** 24.7 27.6 29.4 Non-significant
Serum zinc (µg/dl) (mean± SD) * 91.02± 25.99 88.62± 27.06 88.70± 25.08 Non-significant
Zinc deficiency*** (%) ** 16.2 16 17.3 Non-significant

*One-way ANOVA test

**χ2 test

***<66 µgr/dl


[TableWrap ID: T0002] Table 2 

Characteristics of participants and comparison of serum zinc concentration of groups (mean± SD)


Variable n (%) (n = 961) Serum zinc at screening (µg/dl) p value
Age (year)* ≤19 42 (4.4) 93.02 (27.93) Non-significant
20-24 317 (33.0) 90.62 (27.63)
25-29 360 (37.5) 88.99 (24.88)
30-34 192 (20.0) 86.77 (24.53)
≥35 50 (5.2) 88.64 (25.73)
Body mass index (kg/m2)* at the first trimester < 19.8 133 (13.8) 90.51 (24.51) Non-significant
19.8-26 535 (55.7) 89.99 (27.01)
26.1-29.9 195 (20.3) 86.83 (25.08)
≥ 30 98 (10.2) 88.22 (23.29)
Parity (n) 0 612 (63.7) 91.03 (26.14) 0.022
1 266 (27.7) 86.81 (26.58)
≥2 83 (8.6) 83.86 (20.58)
Occupation (%) ** Housekeeper 868 (90.3) 89.44 (26.10) Non-significant
Employed 93 (9.7) 86.97 (24.07)
Educational status ** ≤ 5th grade 95 (9.9%) 88.92 (24.58) Non-significant
6th -8th grade 139 (14.4%) 84.83 (25.68)
9th -12th grade 586 (61.0%) 90.33 (26.12)
University 141(14.7%) 89.87 (25.83)
Last method of contraception Hormonal 134 (13.9%) 86.48 (24.12) Non-significant
IUD 50 (5.2%) 84.98 (26.52)
Barrier 94 (9.8%) 87.73 (24.50)
Withdrawal 489 (50.9%) 89.61 (25.66)
Nothing or breast feeding 194 (20.2%) 92.84 (28.05)

*One-way ANOVA

**T-test


[TableWrap ID: T0003] Table 3 

Correlation between variable measurements and serum zinc z scores (mean± SD)


Variable Variable measurement Coefficient between measure and serum zinc z score p value
Age (year) 26.44 (4.6) −0.056 Non-significant
Parity (n) .47 (.71) −0.084 0.007
Weight (kg) 62.64 (11.25) −0.067 0.039
Height (cm) 160.81 (5.79) −0.055 Non-significant
Body mass index (kg/m2) at the first trimester 24.22 (4.12) −0.048 Non-significant

Significant level was set at P< 0.05.



Article Categories:
  • Original Article

Keywords: Anthropometry, Parity, Socio-Demographic Factors, Zinc.

Previous Document:  Effect of Urinary Incontinence on Quality of Life among Iranian Women.
Next Document:  Honey Supplementation to Semen-Freezing Medium ImprovesHuman Sperm Parameters Post-Thawing.