|The controversy over retrospective moral judgment.|
|PMID: 11653396 Owner: KIE Status: MEDLINE|
|The mandate of the U.S. Advisory Committee on Human Radiation Experiments required that the Committee take a position on the validity of retrospective moral judgments. However, throughout its period of operation, the Committee remained divided on the question of whether sound judgments of individual culpability and wrongdoing should be included in its Final Report. This essay examines the arguments that various committee members marshalled to support their opposing views on retrospective moral judgment and explains the significance of the controversy.|
Related Documents :
|25218316 - Aetiology of maxillofacial fractures: a review of published studies during the last 30 ...
7282956 - Nonlinearity, multistability, and fluctuations: reviewing the reviewers.
8305786 - So much writing, so little science: a review of 37 years of literature on edetate sodiu...
21409396 - Maxillary cementoblastoma-a rarity.
12532046 - Carney complex: report of a japanese case associated with cutaneous superficial angiomy...
9820426 - Primary amyloidosis of the mesentery and the retroperitoneum presenting with lymphedema.
|Type: Historical Article; Journal Article|
|Title: Kennedy Institute of Ethics journal Volume: 6 ISSN: 1054-6863 ISO Abbreviation: Kennedy Inst Ethics J Publication Date: 1996 Sep|
|Created Date: 1996-12-23 Completed Date: 1996-12-23 Revised Date: 2007-11-15|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 9109135 Medline TA: Kennedy Inst Ethics J Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 245-50 Citation Subset: E|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Compensation and Redress
Dissent and Disputes
Evaluation Studies as Topic
History, 20th Century
Retrospective Moral Judgment*
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Revising the history of Cold War research ethics.
Next Document: Looking back and judging our predecessors.