Document Detail


The concept of an anatomy related individual arterial access: lowering technical and clinical complications with transradial access in bovine- and type-III aortic arch carotid artery stenting.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22090180     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Carotid artery stenting (CAS) from the femoral approach can be anatomically very difficult and the incidence of complications is higher in patients with anatomical variations of the aortic arch, difficulties related to peripheral vascular disease and/or with access site complications. Because the typical morphology in patients with a bovine- or type-III aortic arch applies for an arterial access from the right upper extremity (e.g. radial, brachial) we evaluated success rates and safety of the right transradial access in a prospective study.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Between June 2009 and October 2010, seventeen patients (mean age 74,4 ± 9 years, 10 male) with a bovine- (n = 4) or type-III aortic arch (n = 12) underwent CAS with a planned transradial- (n = 3) or after problematic transfemoral access (n = 14). In patients with a type-III aortic arch (n = 13), the right target common carotid artery (CCA) was cannulated from the right radial artery with a 5F IMA diagnostic catheter-, in patients with a bovine aortic arch (n = 4), the left CCA was accessed from the right radial artery with a 5F Amplatz- or Judkins left catheter. In all patients a 6F- (n = 14) or 5F- (n = 3) shuttle sheath was inserted via the diagnostic catheter and a 0.035” extra-stiff guidewire. All interventions were carried out with the use of a peripheral embolization protection device (EPD). Primary study endpoints were procedural success and major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), secondary endpoints were access site complications and the mean intervention time.
RESULTS: Procedural success could be achieved in all patients (100 %), MACCE and access site complications did not occur in any patient. Mean interventional time was 48 ± 18 min.
CONCLUSIONS: CAS using the right transradial approach for left CAS in bovine-type aortic arch or the right transradial approach in type-III aortic arch for right CAS appears to be safe and technically feasible.
Authors:
J B Dahm; F van Buuren; C Hansen; J Becker; H-G Wolpers
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  VASA. Zeitschrift für Gefässkrankheiten     Volume:  40     ISSN:  0301-1526     ISO Abbreviation:  VASA     Publication Date:  2011 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-17     Completed Date:  2012-01-31     Revised Date:  2012-10-19    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0317051     Medline TA:  Vasa     Country:  Switzerland    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  468-73     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Cardiology-Angiology, Heart and Vascular Center Neu-Bethlehem, Göttingen, Germany. dahm@hgz-goettingen.de
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Angiography
Angioplasty / methods*
Aorta, Thoracic* / radiography
Carotid Stenosis / radiography,  therapy*
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Radial Artery
Stents*
Stroke / prevention & control

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Results of combined preoperative direct percutaneous embolization and surgical excision in treatment...
Next Document:  Surgical reconstruction for unilateral iliac artery lesions in patients younger than 50 years.