Document Detail


A comparison of ultrasound-guided supraclavicular and infraclavicular blocks for upper extremity surgery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19419356     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Ultrasound (US)-guided supraclavicular or infraclavicular blocks are commonly used for upper extremity surgery. The aims of this randomized study were to compare the block performance and onset times, effectiveness, incidence of adverse events and patient's acceptance of US-guided supraclavicular or infraclavicular blocks. We hypothesized that the supraclavicular approach, being more superficial and easier to visualize using a 10 MHz transducer, will produce a faster and a more extensive sensory block. METHODS: One hundred and twenty patients were randomized to two equal groups: supraclavicular (S) and infraclavicular (I). Each patient received a mixture containing equal volumes of ropivacaine 7.5 mg/ml and mepivacaine 20 mg/ml with adrenaline 5 microg/ml, 0.5 ml/kg body weight (minimum 30 ml, maximum 50 ml). The sensory score (anaesthesia--2 points, analgesia--1 point and pain--0 point) of the seven terminal nerves was assessed every 10 min. Patients were declared ready for surgery when they had an effective surgical block--anaesthesia or analgesia of the five nerves below the elbow. Thirty minutes after the block, the unblocked nerves were supplemented. The block performance and latency times, surgical effectiveness, adverse events and patient's acceptance were recorded. RESULTS: Significantly more patients in the I group were ready for surgery 20 and 30 min after the block. The mean block performance time was 5.7 min in the S group and 5.0 min in the I group (NS). Block effectiveness was superior in the I group: 93% vs. 78% in the S group (P=0.017). The S group patients had a significantly poorer block of the median and ulnar nerves, but a better block of the axillary nerve. Sensory scores at 10, 20 and 30 min were not significantly different. Thirty-two patients in the S group vs. nine patients in the I group experienced transient adverse events (P<0.0001). Patients' acceptance of the block was similar in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Infraclavicular block had a faster onset, better surgical effectiveness and fewer adverse events. Block performance time and patients' acceptance of the procedure were similar in both groups.
Authors:
Z J Koscielniak-Nielsen; B S Frederiksen; H Rasmussen; L Hesselbjerg
Related Documents :
22281786 - Alternate-day versus daily atorvastatin in coronary artery disease: a randomized study.
20058036 - Comparison of 0.25% levobupivacaine and 0.25% bupivacaine for posterior approach inters...
18477086 - Ropivacaine and levobupivacaine for bilateral selective ankle block in patients undergo...
17986166 - Botulinum toxin occipital nerve block for the treatment of severe occipital neuralgia: ...
18080826 - Routine preoperative ultrasonography and selective cholecystectomy in laparoscopic roux...
19682916 - Six year follow-up of a patient treated with mandibular symphyseal distraction osteogen...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Acta anaesthesiologica Scandinavica     Volume:  53     ISSN:  1399-6576     ISO Abbreviation:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand     Publication Date:  2009 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-05-07     Completed Date:  2009-07-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0370270     Medline TA:  Acta Anaesthesiol Scand     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  620-6     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Anaesthesia, Rigshospital, University of Copenhagen, HOC, Copenhagen, Denmark. zjkn@rh.dk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Brachial Plexus / ultrasonography*
Data Interpretation, Statistical
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Monitoring, Intraoperative
Nerve Block / adverse effects,  methods*
Pain Measurement
Patient Acceptance of Health Care
Prospective Studies
Sample Size
Upper Extremity / surgery*
Young Adult

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Inefficacy of simulator-based training on anaesthesiologists' non-technical skills.
Next Document:  Prescription pattern of codeine for non-malignant pain: a pharmacoepidemiological study from the Nor...