Document Detail

A comparison of the reproducibility and the sensitivity to change of visual analogue scales, Borg scales, and Likert scales in normal subjects during submaximal exercise.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  10559077     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECTIVE: To assess which subjective scale, the visual analogue scale (VAS), the Borg CR10 (Borg) scale, or the Likert scale (LS), if any, is decidedly more reproducible and sensitive to change in the assessment of symptoms. DESIGN: Prospective clinical study. SETTING: Exercise laboratory. PARTICIPANTS: Twenty-three physically active male subjects (mean +/- SD age of 30 +/- 4 years old) were recruited. INTERVENTION: Each subject attended the exercise laboratory on four occasions at intervals of 1 week. Three subjective scales were used: (1) the VAS (continuous scale); (2) the Borg scale (12 fixed points); and (3) the Likert scale (LS; 5 fixed points). Four identical submaximal tests were given (2 min at 60% maximum oxygen uptake [VO(2)max] and 6 min at 70% VO(2)max). Two tests were undertaken to assess the reproducibility of scores that were obtained with each subjective scale. Two other tests were undertaken to assess the sensitivity of each scale to a change in symptom perception: a double-blind treatment with propranolol, 80 mg, (ie, active therapy; to increase the sensation of breathlessness and general fatigue during exercise) or matching placebo. The subjective scale scores were measured at 1 min 30 s, 5 min 30 s, and 7 min 15 s of exercise. Reproducibility was defined as the proportion of total variance (ie, between-subject plus within-subject variance) explained by the between-subject variance given as a percentage. Sensitivity was defined as the effect of the active drug therapy over the variation within subjects. RESULTS: Overall, the VAS performed best in terms of reproducibility for breathlessness and general fatigue, with reproducibility coefficients as high as 78%. For sensitivity, the VAS was best for breathlessness (ratio, 2.7) and the Borg scale was most sensitive for general fatigue (ratio, 3.0). The relationships between the respective psychological and physiologic variables were reasonably stable throughout the testing procedure, with overall typical correlations of 0.73 to 0.82 CONCLUSION: This study suggests that subjective scales can reproducibly measure symptoms during steady-state exercise and can detect the effect of a drug intervention. The VAS and Borg scales appear to be the best subjective scales for this purpose.
S Grant; T Aitchison; E Henderson; J Christie; S Zare; J McMurray; H Dargie
Related Documents :
17931447 - Is electrogustometry useful for screening abnormalities of taste?
11799537 - Defining hypnosis as a trance vs. cooperation: hypnotic inductions, suggestibility, and...
24951297 - Systematic review: carbohydrate supplementation on exercise performance or capacity of ...
23942167 - Optimizing interval training at power output associated with peak oxygen uptake in well...
24958737 - The minimum clinically important improvement in the incremental shuttle walk test follo...
3398247 - Relationship between tracheal air flow and induced changes in intrathoracic volume. a b...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Chest     Volume:  116     ISSN:  0012-3692     ISO Abbreviation:  Chest     Publication Date:  1999 Nov 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1999-11-30     Completed Date:  1999-11-30     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0231335     Medline TA:  Chest     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1208-17     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Centre for Exercise Science and Medicine, Institute of Biomedical and Life Sciences, University of Glasgow, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Adrenergic beta-Antagonists / pharmacology
Double-Blind Method
Dyspnea / physiopathology*
Exercise Test
Fatigue / physiopathology*
Propranolol / pharmacology
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Respiration / drug effects
Respiratory Function Tests
Sensitivity and Specificity
Reg. No./Substance:
0/Adrenergic beta-Antagonists; 525-66-6/Propranolol

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Physiological response to moderate exercise workloads in a pulmonary rehabilitation program in patie...
Next Document:  Echocardiographic predictors of an adverse response to a nifedipine trial in primary pulmonary hyper...