Document Detail

A comparison of jump height, takeoff velocities, and blocking coverage in the swing and traditional volleyball blocking techniques.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24570609     Owner:  NLM     Status:  PubMed-not-MEDLINE    
The purpose of this study was to compare traditional and swing blocking techniques on center of mass (COM) projectile motion and effective blocking area in nine healthy Division I female volleyball players. Two high-definition (1080 p) video cameras (60 Hz) were used to collect two-dimensional variables from two separate views. One was placed perpendicular to the plane of the net and the other was directed along the top of the net, and were used to estimate COM locations and blocking area in a plane parallel to the net and hand penetration through the plane of the net respectively. Video of both the traditional and swing techniques were digitized and kinematic variables were calculated. Paired samples t-tests indicated that the swing technique resulted in greater (p < 0.05) vertical and horizontal takeoff velocities (vy and vx), jump height (H), duration of the block (tBLOCK), blocking coverage during the block (C) as well as hand penetration above and through the net's plane (YPEN, ZPEN). The traditional technique had significantly greater approach time (tAPP). The results of this study suggest that the swing technique results in both greater jump height and effective blocking area. However, the shorter tAPP that occurs with swing is associated with longer times in the air during the block which may reduce the ability of the athlete to make adjustments to attacks designed to misdirect the defense. Key PointsSwing blocking technique has greater jump height, effective blocking area, hand penetration, horizontal and vertical takeoff velocity, and has a shorter time of approach.Despite these advantages, there may be more potential for mistiming blocks and having erratic deflections of the ball after contact when using the swing technique.Coaches should take more than simple jump height and hand penetration into account when deciding which technique to employ.
Travis Ficklin; Robin Lund; Megan Schipper
Related Documents :
24187209 - Initial development of direct interaction for a transfer robotic arm system for caregiv...
24187179 - Passive-type rehabilitation system for upper limbs which can display the exact resistan...
24810169 - Relaxed open mouth as a playful signal in wild ring-tailed lemurs.
24805849 - Synchronising movements with the sounds of a virtual partner enhances partner likeability.
24412269 - Effects of adding a virtual reality environment to different modes of treadmill walking.
8800939 - Strength-duration properties of human peripheral nerve.
23466939 - Ballistocardiographic artifact removal from simultaneous eeg-fmri using an optical moti...
6601029 - The effects of retinal target location on suppression of the vestibulo-ocular reflex.
11381689 - The adiabatic anti-jitter circuit.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2014-01-20
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of sports science & medicine     Volume:  13     ISSN:  1303-2968     ISO Abbreviation:  J Sports Sci Med     Publication Date:  2014 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2014-02-26     Completed Date:  2014-02-26     Revised Date:  2014-03-03    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101174629     Medline TA:  J Sports Sci Med     Country:  Turkey    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  78-83     Citation Subset:  -    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Lactate Kinetics during Multiple Set Resistance Exercise.
Next Document:  Comparison of the effects of local cryotherapy and passive cross-body stretch on extensibility in su...