Document Detail

A comparison of fixed-step-size and Bayesian staircases for sensory threshold estimation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  17524255     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Fixed-step-size (FSS) and Bayesian staircases are widely used methods to estimate sensory thresholds in 2AFC tasks, although a direct comparison of both types of procedure under identical conditions has not previously been reported. A simulation study and an empirical test were conducted to compare the performance of optimized Bayesian staircases with that of four optimized variants of FSS staircase differing as to up-down rule. The ultimate goal was to determine whether FSS or Bayesian staircases are the best choice in experimental psychophysics. The comparison considered the properties of the estimates (i.e. bias and standard errors) in relation to their cost (i.e. the number of trials to completion). The simulation study showed that mean estimates of Bayesian and FSS staircases are dependable when sufficient trials are given and that, in both cases, the standard deviation (SD) of the estimates decreases with number of trials, although the SD of Bayesian estimates is always lower than that of FSS estimates (and thus, Bayesian staircases are more efficient). The empirical test did not support these conclusions, as (1) neither procedure rendered estimates converging on some value, (2) standard deviations did not follow the expected pattern of decrease with number of trials, and (3) both procedures appeared to be equally efficient. Potential factors explaining the discrepancies between simulation and empirical results are commented upon and, all things considered, a sensible recommendation is for psychophysicists to run no fewer than 18 and no more than 30 reversals of an FSS staircase implementing the 1-up/3-down rule.
Rocío Alcalá-Quintana; Miguel A García-Pérez
Related Documents :
17356445 - Co-bedding twins: how pilot study findings guided improvements in planning a larger mul...
22115085 - Kinetic limitations on tracer partitioning in ganglia dominated source zones.
17639505 - Modelling, prediction and adaptive adjustment of recruitment in multicentre trials.
15483415 - In silico design of clinical trials: a method coming of age.
25298615 - Inner wellbeing: concept and validation of a new approach to subjective perceptions of ...
22616875 - Homotopy semi-numerical simulation of peristaltic flow of generalised oldroyd-b fluids ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Evaluation Studies; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spatial vision     Volume:  20     ISSN:  0169-1015     ISO Abbreviation:  Spat Vis     Publication Date:  2007  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-05-25     Completed Date:  2007-07-31     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8602662     Medline TA:  Spat Vis     Country:  Netherlands    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  197-218     Citation Subset:  IM    
Departamento de Metodología, Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Complutense, Campus de Somosaguas, 28223 Madrid, Spain.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Bayes Theorem*
Psychophysics / methods*
Sensory Thresholds*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Oscillatory depth as a function of temporal frequency.
Next Document:  Which geometric model for the curvature of 2-D shape contours?