Document Detail

A comparison of different biogeographical classifications of Europe, Great Britain and Spain.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12197075     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Various biogeographical and bioclimatic classifications of a number of regions, countries and continents have been created to meet different objectives. A policy maker might ask the question 'why is there no single accepted classification and how do the different classifications compare with one another?' In order to answer these two questions three classifications created by different methods for Great Britain and two for Spain are compared using the Kappa statistic. All of the classifications were created from data on cellular grids with a set window size. Further non-statistical comparisons are made with other classifications. The biogeographic classifications studied in this paper produced three different types of zone: those that were always identified whatever the method; those that were broadly similar but where the boundaries differed; and those that were unique to a particular classification. These different types of zone are likely to exist for any comparison between classifications of a particular region. The extent of the geographic window from which data were obtained had a major effect on the classification of grid cells at the edges of the window. For example, the few grid cells in the south of England, with characteristics of continental Europe, are not detected if data from Great Britain alone are used for the classification. We conclude that the data window should always be larger than the area for which the classification is being made. The objective Kappa statistic, although useful, was not capable of discerning similarities and dissimilarities that appear obvious to the subjective human eye. Although the details of the classifications differed there were broad similarities between the classifications and these differences reflect important divisions along major environmental axes that have been inferred by earlier biogeographers. As the divisions are real there is a sound basis for their use in future land use or environmental policy.
R G H Bunce; P D Carey; R Elena-Rossello; J Orr; J Watkins; R Fuller
Related Documents :
10935455 - How good are support vector machines?
2292255 - Reconstruction of the frank vectorcardiogram from standard electrocardiographic leads: ...
20064235 - Effect of training-sample size and classification difficulty on the accuracy of genomic...
11101265 - Athletic footwear: design, performance and selection issues.
19766455 - A multilevel item response theory model was investigated for longitudinal vision-relate...
23935445 - An adaptive cauchy differential evolution algorithm for global numerical optimization.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of environmental management     Volume:  65     ISSN:  0301-4797     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Environ. Manage.     Publication Date:  2002 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-08-28     Completed Date:  2003-01-14     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0401664     Medline TA:  J Environ Manage     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  121-34     Citation Subset:  IM    
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology, Merlewood, Grange-Over-Sands, Cumbria, LA11 6JU, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Geographic Information Systems*
Models, Theoretical*
Reference Values

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Multicriteria analysis of environmental quality in Taipei: public preferences and improvement strate...
Next Document:  Restoring fire as an ecological process in shortgrass prairie ecosystems: initial effects of prescri...