Document Detail


A comparison of cervical spine motion during orotracheal intubation with the trachlight(r) or the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19372349     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Tracheal intubation of an unstable cervical spine (c-spine) patient with the flexible fiberoptic bronchoscope (FOB) is thought to minimize c-spine movement but may be technically difficult in certain patients. Intubation using a luminous stylet, such as the Trachlight(R) (TL), also produces minimal motion of the c-spine and may be an interesting alternative technique for patients with an unstable c-spine. In this study, we compared the cervical motion caused by the TL and the FOB during intubation. METHODS: Twenty patients with a normal c-spine undergoing general anesthesia, including neuromuscular blockade, for a neuroradiologic intervention were included in a prospective, randomized, controlled, nonblinded, crossover trial. Each patient was tracheally intubated sequentially with the TL and the FOB in a randomized order. Manual in-line stabilization was applied by an assistant during intubation. The motions produced by intubation from the occiput (C0) to C5 were recorded in the sagittal plane using continuous cinefluoroscopy. For movement analysis, the recordings were divided into four stages: "baseline" before intubation began; "introduction" of the intubation device; "intubation" (passage of the tube through the vocal cords); and "removal" of the device. For each intubating device, the average maximal segmental motion observed in every patient at any stage or cervical segment was calculated and compared using Student's t-test. The time required to intubate with each device was also compared. RESULTS: There was no significant difference in the mean maximum segmental motion produced during intubation with the TL versus the FOB (12 degrees +/- 6 degrees vs 11 degrees +/- 5 degrees ; P = 0.5). Segmental movements occurred predominantly at the C0-1 and C1-2 levels, and maximal movements were observed during the introduction stage in 18/20 patients for both devices. Intubation took less time with the TL (34 +/- 17 vs 60 +/- 15 s, P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: In patients under general anesthesia with neuromuscular blockade and manual in-line stabilization, we found no difference in the segmental c-spine motion produced during endotracheal intubation using the FOB and the TL.
Authors:
Bryan J Houde; Stephan R Williams; Alexandre Cadrin-Chênevert; François Guilbert; Pierre Drolet
Related Documents :
17321829 - Symmetry of timing of hip and lumbopelvic rotation motion in 2 different subgroups of p...
11979169 - Intraoperative measurement of lumbar spine motion segment stiffness.
11415779 - Coordination between the lumbar spine lordosis and trunk angle during weight lifting.
2730309 - Low-frequency magnetic field technology: quantifying spinal range of motion.
17096269 - Motion analysis of the mandible during low-speed, rear-end impacts using high-speed x-r...
20538229 - The pelvic crossed syndromes: a reflection of imbalanced function in the myofascial env...
15910039 - Orientational dynamics of water confined on a nanometer length scale in reverse micelles.
16503119 - Bilateral oscillations for lateralized spikes in benign rolandic epilepsy.
22217959 - Cross-frequency decomposition: a novel technique for studying interactions between neur...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article; Randomized Controlled Trial; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Anesthesia and analgesia     Volume:  108     ISSN:  1526-7598     ISO Abbreviation:  Anesth. Analg.     Publication Date:  2009 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-04-17     Completed Date:  2009-04-30     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  1310650     Medline TA:  Anesth Analg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1638-43     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Departement of Anesthesiology, Centre Hospitalier de l'Université de Montréal, Hôpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Anesthesia, General
Bronchoscopes*
Bronchoscopy*
Cervical Vertebrae / physiology*,  radiography
Cineradiography
Cross-Over Studies
Equipment Design
Female
Fiber Optic Technology*
Humans
Intubation, Intratracheal / adverse effects,  instrumentation*
Light*
Male
Middle Aged
Movement*
Neuromuscular Blockade
Prospective Studies

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Phenylephrine ameliorates cerebral cytotoxic edema and reduces cerebral infarction volume in a rat m...
Next Document:  Central poststroke pain: a review of pathophysiology and treatment.