Document Detail

A comparative study of shear bond strength between metal and ceramic brackets and artificially aged composite restorations using different surface treatments.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21447779     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
This in vitro study evaluated the shear bond strength (SBS) between ceramic brackets (CBs) and resin composite restorations (RCRs) prepared using different surface treatments. The findings were also compared with a similar study that used stainless steel brackets (SSBs). Forty-five premolars were restored with a nano-hybrid composite resin (Tetric EvoCeram) and randomly assigned to three surface treatment groups: group 1, 5 per cent hydrofluoric acid (HF); group 2, air abrasion (50 μm alumina particles); and group 3, diamond bur. Specimens were bonded with CBs (Fascination) and exposed to thermo-cycling (500 cycles). The shear force at a crosshead speed of 1 mm/minute was transmitted to brackets. The adhesive remnant index (ARIs) scores were recorded after bracket failure. The analysis of SBS variance (P < 0.01) and chi-square test of ARIs scores (P < 0.01) revealed significant differences among three groups tested. The SBS in group 3 (mean: 26.34 ± 4.76 MPa) and group 2 (mean: 26.68 ± 5.93 MPa) was significantly higher than group 1 (mean: 16.25 ± 5.42 MPa). The SBS was significantly higher in CBs (mean: 23.09 ± 7.19 MPa) compared to SSBs (mean: 15.56 ± 5.13 MPa). High ARIs (100 per cent) occurred in SSBs treated with a diamond bur, whereas CBs primarily failed at the resin-adhesive interface (P < 0.01). In two-thirds of the specimens (SSBs or CBs), no adhesive was left on the restoration after HF conditioning. The ARIs profile of CBs and SSBs that received surface treatments with air abrasion were similar (P > 0.05) and bond failure occurred mainly in adhesive-bracket base and resin-adhesive interfaces. The diamond bur surface treatment is recommended as a safe and cost-effective method of bonding CBs to RCRs.
Ladan Eslamian; Ali Borzabadi-Farahani; Nasim Mosavian; Amir Ghasemi
Related Documents :
23184599 - Incidence and predictors of phantom shocks in implantable cardioverter defibrillator re...
24560299 - Management of distal/bifurcation left main restenosis after drug eluting stents implant...
23869369 - Comparative clinical study of three-unit fixed partial prostheses supported by two or t...
23719269 - Hearing preservation results after cochlear implantation in short-term and long-term ob...
24179979 - Hard tissue response to argon plasma cleaning/sterilisation of customised titanium abut...
24774449 - Double-wire technique for implanting a left ventricular venous lead in patients with co...
19558289 - Financial impact of spinal cord stimulation on the healthcare budget: a comparative ana...
11787179 - Effect of the inclusion of skimmed milk in freezing extenders on the viability of canin...
20877709 - Catastrophic hemothorax on the contralateral side of the insertion of an implantable su...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-3-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  European journal of orthodontics     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1460-2210     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-3-30     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7909010     Medline TA:  Eur J Orthod     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Department of Orthodontics and Dental Research Center, School of Dentistry, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Inherited variants in mitochondrial biogenesis genes may influence epithelial ovarian cancer risk.
Next Document:  In vitro orthodontic bracket bonding to porcelain.