Document Detail


A case study of qualitative versus quantitative reviews: the maternal-infant bonding controversy.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  2649651     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This study used meta-analysis methodology to examine a series of studies in maternal-infant attachment. The results of this quantitative analysis were compared with those of a classic qualitative analysis of the same subject. The advantages and disadvantages of both quantitative and qualitative approaches to literature reviews are discussed and compared with quantitative and qualitative analyses of individual research studies.
Authors:
M S Brown; P Hellings
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of pediatric nursing     Volume:  4     ISSN:  0882-5963     ISO Abbreviation:  J Pediatr Nurs     Publication Date:  1989 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1989-05-23     Completed Date:  1989-05-23     Revised Date:  2007-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8607529     Medline TA:  J Pediatr Nurs     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  104-11     Citation Subset:  N    
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Female
Humans
Infant, Newborn
Meta-Analysis as Topic*
Mother-Child Relations*
Object Attachment*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Water-soluble contrast media in obstructed in ischemic small intestine. A clinical and experimental ...
Next Document:  Glycosylation and processing of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein.