| A case study of qualitative versus quantitative reviews: the maternal-infant bonding controversy. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 2649651 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
This study used meta-analysis methodology to examine a series of studies in maternal-infant attachment. The results of this quantitative analysis were compared with those of a classic qualitative analysis of the same subject. The advantages and disadvantages of both quantitative and qualitative approaches to literature reviews are discussed and compared with quantitative and qualitative analyses of individual research studies. |
| | |
Authors:
|
M S Brown; P Hellings |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article; Review |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Journal of pediatric nursing Volume: 4 ISSN: 0882-5963 ISO Abbreviation: J Pediatr Nurs Publication Date: 1989 Apr |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 1989-05-23 Completed Date: 1989-05-23 Revised Date: 2007-11-15 |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8607529 Medline TA: J Pediatr Nurs Country: UNITED STATES |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 104-11 Citation Subset: N |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Female Humans Infant, Newborn Meta-Analysis as Topic* Mother-Child Relations* Object Attachment* |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Water-soluble contrast media in obstructed in ischemic small intestine. A clinical and experimental ...
Next Document: Glycosylation and processing of the human immunodeficiency virus type 1 envelope protein.