Document Detail

A case-comparison study of the subdural evacuating port system in treating chronic subdural hematomas.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20001585     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
OBJECT: The Subdural Evacuating Port System (SEPS) was recently introduced as a novel method of treating chronic subdural hematomas (SDHs). This system is a variation of the existing twist-drill craniostomy methods for treating chronic SDH. Compared with craniotomy or bur hole treatment of chronic SDH, this system offers the possibility of treatment at bedside without general anesthesia. In comparison with existing twist-drill methods, the system theoretically offers the advantage of a hermetically closed system that can evacuate a hematoma without an intracranial catheter. METHODS: The authors performed a case-control study of all chronic SDHs treated at a single institution over a 5-year period and compared the efficacy and safety of the SEPS to bur hole evacuation. Patients were matched for age, injury mechanism, medical comorbidities, use of anticoagulation, and radiographic appearance of the SDH. The primary outcome of interest was the recurrence rate in each group, which was evaluated by radiographic evidence as well as the number of patients requiring a second procedure. Secondary outcomes examined were mortality, infection, acute hematoma formation, seizure, length of hospital stay, length of intensive care unit stay, and discharge location. RESULTS: The authors found that there were no appreciable differences in symptoms on presentation, existing comorbidities, home medications, or laboratory values between the treatment groups. The average Hounsfield units of preoperative CT scanning was similar in both groups. Radiographic recurrence was statistically similar between the SEPS group (25.9%) and the bur hole group (18.5%; p = 0.37). Although there was a trend toward higher reoperation rates in the SEPS group, the need for a subsequent procedure was also statistically similar between the SEPS group (25.9%) and the bur hole group (14.8%; p = 0.25). The mortality rate was not significantly different between the SEPS group (9.5%) and the bur hole group (4.8%; p = 0.50). The SEPS procedure provided a mean reduction in SDH thickness of 27.3% compared with 37.9% with bur hole (p = 0.05) when comparing the preoperative CT scan with the first postoperative CT scan. The percentage of reduction in SDH thickness when comparing the preoperative CT scan with the most recent postoperative CT scan was 40.5% in the SEPS group and 45.4% in the bur hole group (p = 0.31). CONCLUSIONS: The SEPS offers an alternative type of twist-drill craniostomy for the treatment of chronic SDH with a trend toward higher recurrence in our experience. The efficacy and safety of SEPS is similar to that of other twist-drill methods reported in the literature. In the authors' experience, the efficacy of this treatment as measured by radiographic worsening or the need for a subsequent procedure is statistically similar to that of bur hole treatment. There was no difference in mortality or other adverse outcomes associated with SEPS.
Anand I Rughani; Chih Lin; Travis M Dumont; Paul L Penar; Michael A Horgan; Bruce I Tranmer
Related Documents :
19189055 - Initial experience with bevacizumab treatment for biopsy confirmed cerebral radiation n...
12015835 - Long-term results after stereotactic radiosurgery for patients with cavernous malformat...
23860985 - Vasopressin, steroids, and epinephrine and neurologically favorable survival after in-h...
21209505 - Does short-term endotracheal intubation affects the acoustic characteristics?
24986595 - Comparison of mortality prediction models in burns icu patients in pinderfields hospita...
2746155 - The course of atherosclerotic diseases after carotid endarterectomy in 279 patients fol...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of neurosurgery     Volume:  113     ISSN:  1933-0693     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Neurosurg.     Publication Date:  2010 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-09-02     Completed Date:  2010-09-29     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0253357     Medline TA:  J Neurosurg     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  609-14     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Division of Neurosurgery, University of Vermont, Burlington, Vermont 05401, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Case-Control Studies
Craniotomy / adverse effects,  instrumentation,  methods
Drainage / adverse effects,  instrumentation,  methods
Hematoma, Subdural, Chronic / drug therapy,  epidemiology,  surgery*
Neurosurgical Procedures / adverse effects,  instrumentation,  methods
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  The Influence of Alcohol on behavioral recovery following mTBI in mice.
Next Document:  Trans-sodium crocetinate enhancing survival and glioma response on magnetic resonance imaging to rad...