Document Detail


The bone-anchored hearing aid in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness: experience with 58 patients.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20738337     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVES: To assess the efficacy of the bone-anchored hearing aid (BAHA) in the rehabilitation of single-sided deafness (SSD).
STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective case-control series review.
SETTING: Tertiary referral unit.
PATIENTS: Fifty-eight consecutive patients that had a bone-anchored hearing aid for single-sided deafness completed outcome questionnaires, building upon earlier audiological assessment of 19 patients. Single-sided deafness controls (n = 49) were mainly acoustic neuroma patients. Main outcome measurements: speech discrimination testing in directional noise, speech and spatial qualities of hearing questionnaire and the Glasgow Benefit Inventory (GBI).
RESULTS: The mean follow-up time was 28.4 months. Five (13%) of the bone-anchored hearing aid patients were non-users because of lack of benefit. The audiometric testing confirmed that when noise was on the bone-anchored hearing aid side speech perception was reduced but benefited when noise was on the side of the hearing ear. There was no difference between the Speech and Spatial Qualities of Hearing Scores in bone-anchored hearing aid users and controls. In particular there was no difference in the spatial subscores. In the bone-anchored hearing aid users the median Glasgow Benefit Inventory score was 11. If the non-users are included then 13 (22%) patients had no or detrimental (negative) Benefit scores. No or negative benefit scores were more frequent in those deaf for <10 years. In open-field questions, patients felt the bone-anchored hearing aid was most useful in small groups or in 'one-to-one' conversation.
CONCLUSIONS: Bone-anchored hearing aid rehabilitation for single-sided deafness is less successful than for other indications, reflected here by relatively low median Glasgow Benefit Inventory scores. There was also no significant difference between controls and bone-anchored hearing aid users in the Speech and Spatial Qualities of Hearing Questionnaire. Patients with a longer duration of deafness report greater subjective benefit than those more recently deafened, perhaps due to differing expectations.
Authors:
T P C Martin; R Lowther; H Cooper; R L Holder; R M Irving; A P Reid; D W Proops
Related Documents :
8861407 - Perceived sound quality of three bone-anchored hearing aid models.
15085627 - Nonmetro residence, hearing loss, and its accommodation among elderly people.
18529367 - Whispering in your ear: a recent history of subminiature transducers.
3428487 - Perceived benefits of amplification as a function of central auditory status in the eld...
16864217 - 'take your mat and go!': rural malawian women's strategies in the hiv/aids era.
8064027 - Hard-to-manage preschool boys: externalizing behavior, social competence, and family co...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Comparative Study; Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Clinical otolaryngology : official journal of ENT-UK ; official journal of Netherlands Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology & Cervico-Facial Surgery     Volume:  35     ISSN:  1749-4486     ISO Abbreviation:  Clin Otolaryngol     Publication Date:  2010 Aug 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-08-26     Completed Date:  2011-01-18     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101247023     Medline TA:  Clin Otolaryngol     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  284-90     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Otolaryngology, Queen Elizabeth Medical Centre, Birmingham, West Midlands, UK. tpcmartin@blueyonder.co.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Audiometry
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Hearing Aids*
Hearing Loss, Unilateral / physiopathology,  radiotherapy*
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Satisfaction
Questionnaires
Retrospective Studies
Speech Perception / physiology
Suture Anchors*
Treatment Outcome

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  The role of anthropometric measurements in nasal surgery and research: a systematic review.
Next Document:  The relationship between patients' perception of the effects of neurofibromatosis type 2 and the dom...