| The benefit method: fitting hearing aids in noise. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 17478965 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
The most common complaint among individuals with hearing impairment is the inability to follow a conversation when several people are talking simultaneously, a noisy listening situation which is completely different from the quiet surrounding of the conventional pure tone audiometry used as basis for the hearing aid settings. The purpose of this report was to present important characteristics of the BeneFit Method (BFM), a procedure that fits the hearing aid under simulated conditions of competing speech and also a clinical pilot evaluation study comparing the BFM to the NAL-R recommendations and also to the Logic procedure, a GN resound proprietary fitting algorithm representing a modern digital hearing aid fitting procedure. Speech recognition scores in noise (SRSN) using monosyllabic words presented under different background noise levels were evaluated on 21 randomly selected subjects with hearing impairment. The subjects were fitted with the same type of hearing aid Danalogic 163D according to the BFM procedure as well as the logic procedure, the latter developed and recommended by the manufacturer. A comparison of the SRSN when using the subjects' current hearing aid fitted according to the NAL-R procedure was also made. Only the BFM procedure provided a significant SRSN improvement compared to the unaided condition (P< 0.01) in a signal/speech-noise level of 75/65 dB corresponding to a normal cocktail party condition. Moreover, patients performed significantly higher SRSN when fitted according to the BFM, than when fitted according the Logic or NAL-R procedures. The BFM procedure, which is based on individual and functional detection of hearing thresholds in noise levels corresponding to a cocktail party condition, can improve SRSN significantly. Hearing aids should be fitted under conditions similar to those when the hearing disability is perceived the most, i.e, in an environment with background noise. |
| | |
Authors:
|
I Svard; K E Spens; L Back; B H Ahlner; M L Barrenas |
Related Documents
:
|
18003865 - Dual sensory loss: overview of problems, visual assessment, and rehabilitation. 9638825 - A miniaturized artificial mastoid using a skull simulator. 17005485 - Fitting range of the baha cordelle. 7668615 - One-channel and multichannel digitally programmable hearing aids in children with heari... 11393445 - Prospective relationships between drug problems and work adjustment in a community samp... 23252765 - Monitoring functions in managed microbial systems by cytometric bar coding. |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Evaluation Studies; Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Noise & health Volume: 7 ISSN: 1463-1741 ISO Abbreviation: Noise Health Publication Date: 2005 Oct-Dec |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2007-05-04 Completed Date: 2007-09-28 Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 9815620 Medline TA: Noise Health Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 12-23 Citation Subset: IM |
Affiliation:
|
Department of Paediatrics, Queen Silvia Children's Hospital, Göteborg, Sweden. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
Aged Aged, 80 and over Audiometry, Pure-Tone Audiometry, Speech / instrumentation*, methods Auditory Threshold / physiology Denmark Equipment Design Female Hearing Aids* Hearing Loss / diagnosis, rehabilitation* Humans Male Noise Perceptual Masking / physiology Pilot Projects Prosthesis Fitting / instrumentation, methods* Reproducibility of Results Speech Perception* |
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Audiometric findings in petrochemical workers exposed to noise and chemical agents.
Next Document: A comparison of the protective effects of systemic administration of a pro-glutathione drug and a Sr...