Document Detail


On becoming a peer reviewer for a neuropsychology journal.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19640873     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The peer-review process is an invaluable service provided by the professional community, and it provides the critical foundation for the advancement of science. However, there is remarkably little systematic guidance for individuals who wish to become part of this process. This paper, written from the perspective of reviewers and editors with varying levels of experience, provides general guidelines and advice for new reviewers in neuropsychology, as well as outlining benefits of participation in this process. It is hoped that the current information will encourage individuals at all levels to become involved in peer-reviewing for neuropsychology journals.
Authors:
Kevin Duff; Sid E O'Bryant; Holly James Westervelt; Jerry J Sweet; Cecil R Reynolds; Wilfred G van Gorp; Daniel Tranel; Robert J McCaffrey
Related Documents :
21776393 - Vascular complications following isolated limb perfusion for local recurrence of extrem...
10247133 - Antibiotic utilization monitoring--study and review in a canadian teaching hospital.
22624073 - Efferent limb of gastrojejunostomy obstruction by a whole okra phytobezoar: case report...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2009-07-29
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of clinical neuropsychology : the official journal of the National Academy of Neuropsychologists     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1873-5843     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol     Publication Date:  2009 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-08-12     Completed Date:  2009-10-21     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9004255     Medline TA:  Arch Clin Neuropsychol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  201-7     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Deparment of Psychiatry, Roy J. and Lucille A. Carver College of Medicine, University of Iowa, 1-308 MEB, Iowa City, IA 52242-1000, USA. kevin-duff@uiowa.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Guidelines as Topic
Humans
Neuropsychology
Peer Review, Research / methods*,  standards
Periodicals as Topic / standards*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Mutual assessment via visual status signals in Polistes dominulus wasps.
Next Document:  Short cognitive performance test: diagnostic accuracy and education bias in older Brazilian adults.