Document Detail

An assessment of complex spinal loads during dynamic lifting tasks.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  9549793     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
STUDY DESIGN: An electromyogram-assisted free-dynamic lifting model was used to quantify the patterns of complex spinal loads in subjects performing various lifting tasks. OBJECTIVES: To assess in vivo the three-dimensional complex spinal loading patterns associated with high and low risk lifting conditions that matched those observed in industrial settings. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Combined loading on the spine has been implicated as a major risk factor in occupational low back disorders. However, there is a void in the literature regarding the role of these simultaneously occurring complex spinal loads during manual lifting. METHODS: Eleven male subjects performed symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks with varying speed and weight. Reactive forces and moments at L5-S1 were determined through the use of electrogoniometers and a force plate. An electromyogram-assisted model provided the continuous patterns of three-dimensional spinal loads under these complex lifting tasks. RESULTS: The results showed that complex dynamic motions similar to those observed in risky industrial tasks generated substantial levels of combined compressive and shear loads. In addition, higher loading rates were observed under these conditions. Unlike loading magnitudes, loading rate was a better indicator of dynamic loading because it incorporated both the duration and magnitude of net muscle forces contributing to total spinal loading during the lifting conditions. CONCLUSIONS: Quantification of spinal combined motions and loading in vivo has not been undertaken. This study provided a unified assessment of the effects of combined or coupled motions and moments in the internal loading of the spine. Dynamic lifting conditions similar to those observed in risky industrial situations generated unique complex patterns of spinal loading, which have been implicated to pose a higher risk to the spinal structure. The higher predicted loading and loading rate during asymmetric lifting conditions can be avoided by appropriate ergonomic workplace modifications.
F A Fathallah; W S Marras; M Parnianpour
Related Documents :
22854813 - Brassinosteroids, gibberellins and light-mediated signalling are the three-way controls...
12002133 - Effect of annular incision type on the change in biomechanical properties in a herniate...
22492303 - Dose-dependent effects of androgens on the circadian timing system and its response to ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Spine     Volume:  23     ISSN:  0362-2436     ISO Abbreviation:  Spine     Publication Date:  1998 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1998-06-18     Completed Date:  1998-06-18     Revised Date:  2009-07-09    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7610646     Medline TA:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)     Country:  UNITED STATES    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  706-16     Citation Subset:  IM    
Biodynamics Laboratory, Ohio State University, Columbus, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Analysis of Variance
Low Back Pain / etiology
Spine / physiology*
Statistics, Nonparametric
Stress, Mechanical
Weight Lifting / physiology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Reciprocal angulation of vertebral bodies in the sagittal plane in an asymptomatic Greek population.
Next Document:  Functional restoration for chronic low back pain. Two-year follow-up of two randomized clinical tria...