Document Detail


The art of regulation and the regulation of ART: the impact of regulation on research and clinical practice.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12194472     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
How a society regulates Assisted Reproduction Technologies (ART) depends on cultural context. The challenge for the regulatory regime is to balance protection for patients and society with freedom for medico-scientific creativity. Neither an exclusively market-regulated nor a peer-regulated approach is realistic politically, or desirable socially, ethically and legally. Legitimate social issues that go beyond the exclusive expertise of doctors and scientists or market choice by patients need to be accommodated within the regulatory regime. Within this context, four key issues are discussed: the lack of a shared social ethic that helps the needs of the community to be balanced against those of its individual members; the negative impact of intrusive external regulation on scientists and doctors; the requirement for doctors and scientists to review their professional structures reflectively and critically if they are to be entrusted with peer-regulation; and the desirability of constructive dialogue between regulators and regulated rather than the use of coercion and criminal sanctions.
Authors:
Martin H Johnson
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of law and medicine     Volume:  9     ISSN:  1320-159X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Law Med     Publication Date:  2002 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2002-08-26     Completed Date:  2002-09-13     Revised Date:  2005-11-16    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9431853     Medline TA:  J Law Med     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  399-413     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Anatomy, University of Cambridge, Downing Street, Cambridge, United Kingdom CB2 3DY. mhj@mole.bio.cam.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Australia
Bioethics
Cloning, Organism / legislation & jurisprudence
Community Health Planning
Europe
Government
Humans
Legislation, Medical* / standards
Peer Review, Health Care* / standards
Public Policy*
Reproductive Techniques, Assisted / legislation & jurisprudence*
Research
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Social science research and experimentation in Australian criminal proceedings: prejudicial pre-tria...
Next Document:  Professional self-regulation and guidelines in assisted reproduction.