Document Detail


The advantages and disadvantages of mixing methods: an analysis of combining traditional and autoethnographic approaches.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18000077     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Although mixed- and multiple-method research designs are currently gaining momentum and popularity, it is essential that researchers undertake a critical analysis of the process of mixing "mainstream" research designs with newer methods before commencing. In ethnography, not only are there multiple approaches to data collection, but each approach also spans the competing paradigms, thus making the term mainstream ambiguous because these mainstream techniques are reasonably different from one another. When critically appraising the combination of ethnography and autoethnography, researchers must evaluate paradigmatic philosophies and methods of inquiry for commensurability and delineate the advantages and disadvantages of combining methods as they relate to each paradigm. The author's goal in this article is to demarcate the methodologies of both ethnography and autoethnography and then to identify the (dis)advantages that might arise from undertaking multiple-method and/or mixed-method research that uses these approaches concurrently.
Authors:
Patrick O'Byrne
Related Documents :
8807387 - Using triangulation in nursing research.
8684437 - Team research methods for studying intranasal heroin use and its hiv risks.
19863807 - Toxicology of nanomaterials: permanent interactive learning.
23161747 - Large area resist-free soft lithographic patterning of graphene.
2125897 - Research on the acupuncture principles and meridian phenomena by means of infrared ther...
9001867 - What is new in clinical research in contact dermatitis.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Qualitative health research     Volume:  17     ISSN:  1049-7323     ISO Abbreviation:  Qual Health Res     Publication Date:  2007 Dec 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2007-11-16     Completed Date:  2008-01-08     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9202144     Medline TA:  Qual Health Res     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1381-91     Citation Subset:  T    
Affiliation:
School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Anthropology, Cultural / methods*,  trends
Humans
Postmodernism*
Qualitative Research
Research Design
Research Personnel / psychology*
Self Disclosure

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Choose your method: a comparison of phenomenology, discourse analysis, and grounded theory.
Next Document:  "Researcher saturation": the impact of data triangulation and intensive-research practices on the re...