Document Detail


Why we need observational studies to evaluate the effectiveness of health care.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  8634569     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
The view is widely held that experimental methods (randomised controlled trials) are the "gold standard" for evaluation and that observational methods (cohort and case control studies) have little or no value. This ignores the limitations of randomised trials, which may prove unnecessary, inappropriate, impossible, or inadequate. Many of the problems of conducting randomised trials could often, in theory, be overcome, but the practical implications for researchers and funding bodies mean that this is often not possible. The false conflict between those who advocate randomised trials in all situations and those who believe observational data provide sufficient evidence needs to be replaced with mutual recognition of the complementary roles of the two approaches. Researchers should be united in their quest for scientific rigour in evaluation, regardless of the method used.
Authors:
N Black
Related Documents :
13678549 - Prioritisation of health technology assessment. the paths model: methods and case studies.
19799759 - The international xenotransplantation association consensus statement on conditions for...
23685979 - The san francisco declaration on research assessment.
21939849 - Features and futures: seizure detection in partial epilepsies.
11018579 - Adherence to pharmacological interventions. current trends and future directions. the p...
2791559 - Philosophers assess randomized clinical trials: the need for dialogue.
20453039 - Orbitofrontal cortex provides cross-modal valuation of self-generated stimuli.
21620889 - The contribution of the drosophila model to lipid droplet research.
20841899 - The reuse project: ehr as single datasource for biomedical research.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  BMJ (Clinical research ed.)     Volume:  312     ISSN:  0959-8138     ISO Abbreviation:  BMJ     Publication Date:  1996 May 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  1996-07-05     Completed Date:  1996-07-05     Revised Date:  2009-11-18    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8900488     Medline TA:  BMJ     Country:  ENGLAND    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1215-8     Citation Subset:  AIM; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Data Collection
Great Britain
Health Services Research*
Humans
Liability, Legal
Politics
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Research*
Treatment Outcome
Comments/Corrections

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Nurses taking on junior doctors' work: a confusion of accountability.
Next Document:  Intersalt revisited: further analyses of 24 hour sodium excretion and blood pressure within and acro...