Document Detail


Who's arguing? A call for reflexivity in bioethics.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20500762     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
In this paper we set forth what we believe to be a relatively controversial argument, claiming that 'bioethics' needs to undergo a fundamental change in the way it is practised. This change, we argue, requires philosophical bioethicists to adopt reflexive practices when applying their analyses in public forums, acknowledging openly that bioethics is an embedded socio-cultural practice, shaped by the ever-changing intuitions of individual philosophers, which cannot be viewed as a detached intellectual endeavour. This said, we argue that in order to manage the personal, social and cultural embeddedness of bioethics, philosophical bioethicists should openly acknowledge how their practices are constructed and should, in their writing, explicitly deal with issues of bias and conflict of interest, just as empirical scientists are required to do.
Authors:
Jonathan Ives; Michael Dunn
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Bioethics     Volume:  24     ISSN:  1467-8519     ISO Abbreviation:  Bioethics     Publication Date:  2010 Jun 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-05-26     Completed Date:  2010-09-23     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704792     Medline TA:  Bioethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  256-65     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
School of Health and Population Sciences, The University of Birmingham, Edgbaston, Birmingham, UK. j.c.ives@bham.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Anthropology, Cultural
Bias (Epidemiology)
Bioethics / trends*
Conflict of Interest
Dissent and Disputes
Ethical Analysis / methods*
Ethical Theory
Ethicists
Humans
Moral Obligations
Narration
Philosophy*
Power (Psychology)
Professional Role
Public Opinion
Thinking*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Inter-ethics: towards an interactive and interdependent bioethics.
Next Document:  Neurogenesis during optic tectum regeneration in Xenopus laevis.