| Who are we when we are doing what we are doing? The case for mindful embodiment in ethics case consultation. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21790691 Owner: NLM Status: In-Data-Review |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
This paper explores the theory and practice of embodied epistemology or mindful embodiment in ethics case consultation. I argue that not only is this epistemology an ethical imperative to safeguard the integrity of this emerging profession, but that it has the potential to improve the quality of ethics consultation (EC). It also has implications for how ethics consultants are trained and how consultation services are organized. My viewpoint is informed by ethnographic research and by my experimental application of mindful embodiment to the development of an ethics consultation service. My argument proceeds in four phases. First I explore the notion of 'situatedness' in the bioethics literature, identifying gaps in the field's theories as they apply to EC. I then describe my theoretical approach to embodiment grounded in critical-interpretive medical anthropology and autoethnography. I use embodiment to refer to a moral epistemology grounded in the body, comprised of the interplay of physical, symbolic, intersubjective and political elements. Third, I describe how mindful embodiment can inform the role of the ethics consultant and the development of effective training techniques, vocabularies and processes for EC. I also discuss the benefits of this orientation, and the potential harms of ignoring the embodied dimensions of EC. My goals are to expose the fallacy of the 'theory-practice gap', to demonstrate how my own EC practice is deeply informed by this theoretical orientation, and to argue for a wider definition of what 'counts' as relevant theory for ethics consultation. |
| | |
Authors:
|
Andrea Frolic |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: Journal Article |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: Bioethics Volume: 25 ISSN: 1467-8519 ISO Abbreviation: Bioethics Publication Date: 2011 Sep |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-07-27 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 8704792 Medline TA: Bioethics Country: England |
Other Details:
|
Languages: eng Pagination: 370-82 Citation Subset: E; IM |
Copyright Information:
|
© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd. |
Affiliation:
|
McMaster University. |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Monological versus dialogical consciousness - two epistemological views on the use of theory in clin...
Next Document: The role of emotions in moral case deliberation: theory, practice, and methodology.