Document Detail

Which newborn infants are too expensive to treat? Camosy and rationing in intensive care.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23355229     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Are there some newborn infants whose short- and long-term care costs are so great that treatment should not be provided and they should be allowed to die? Public discourse and academic debate about the ethics of newborn intensive care has often shied away from this question. There has been enough ink spilt over whether or when for the infant's sake it might be better not to provide life-saving treatment. The further question of not saving infants because of inadequate resources has seemed too difficult, too controversial, or perhaps too outrageous to even consider. However, Roman Catholic ethicist Charles Camosy has recently challenged this, arguing that costs should be a primary consideration in decision-making in neonatal intensive care.In the first part of this paper I will outline and critique Camosy's central argument, which he calls the 'social quality of life (sQOL)' model. Although there are some conceptual problems with the way the argument is presented, even those who do not share Camosy's Catholic background have good reason to accept his key point that resources should be considered in intensive care treatment decisions for all patients. In the second part of the paper, I explore the ways in which we might identify which infants are too expensive to treat. I argue that both traditional personal 'quality of life' and Camosy's 'sQOL' should factor into these decisions, and I outline two practical proposals.
Dominic Wilkinson
Related Documents :
17118199 - Molecular evidence of ureaplasma urealyticum and ureaplasma parvum colonization in pret...
22419779 - Marketing breast milk substitutes: problems and perils throughout the world.
15590429 - Kinetics of surfactant in respiratory diseases of the newborn infant.
20196389 - Early administration of the second surfactant dose in preterm infants with severe respi...
21311509 - Longitudinal body composition data in exclusively breast-fed infants: a multicenter study.
10697789 - Significance of respiratory syncytial virus (rsv) infection in the 1st year of life.
10963099 - Mr patterns of hypoxic-ischemic brain damage after prenatal, perinatal or postnatal asp...
6722219 - Serum and urine amino acid patterns during the first month of life in small-for-date in...
7511499 - Physiological significance of sharp wave transients on eeg recordings of healthy pre-te...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-26
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-28     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Robinson Institute, Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Adelaide, North Adelaide, South Australia, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Authenticity or autonomy? When deep brain stimulation causes a dilemma.
Next Document:  Use of biomarkers in the management of children with lupus.