Document Detail


When patients refuse assessment of decision-making capacity: how should clinicians respond?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  15364668     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
When patients refuse beneficial treatment, the assessment of decision-making capacity plays a key role in determining the best course of action. However, situations in which patients refuse to explain their reasons occur. This can make an assessment of capacity impossible. In such cases, clinicians find themselves in difficult situations without clear ethical guidance. Refusal to give reasons for refusing beneficial treatment has been seen as pointing to the absence of decision-making capacity. However, the reasons given for this are either unsatisfactory or insufficient to eliminate cases of genuine uncertainty. This article argues that although it cannot be concluded that such patients are incompetent, there are reasons to treat them as if they were. The basis of this possibility, however, points to several obligations for clinicians before such a situation can be said to exist.
Authors:
Samia A Hurst
Related Documents :
24318408 - Histological damage of colonic epithelium is associated with clinical severity and outc...
15750538 - Examining the role of the orthodontist in preventing adolescent tobacco use: a nationwi...
15364668 - When patients refuse assessment of decision-making capacity: how should clinicians resp...
18990268 - Patients' attitude towards the use of a chaperone in breast examination.
7752998 - Significance of lymphoblasts in cerebrospinal fluid in newly diagnosed pediatric acute ...
1328348 - Hladr5 and c4bqo high frequency and antinuclear antibodies positivity in patients with ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Case Reports; Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Archives of internal medicine     Volume:  164     ISSN:  0003-9926     ISO Abbreviation:  Arch. Intern. Med.     Publication Date:  2004 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2004-09-14     Completed Date:  2005-02-15     Revised Date:  2006-11-15    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0372440     Medline TA:  Arch Intern Med     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1757-60     Citation Subset:  AIM; E; IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Bioethics, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD, USA. samia.hurst@medecine.unige.ch
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Aged
Decision Making*
Female
Geriatric Assessment
Humans
Mental Competency / psychology*
Physician's Role / psychology*
Physician-Patient Relations
Risk Assessment
Treatment Refusal / ethics,  psychology*
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
Arch Intern Med. 2005 Mar 14;165(5):590   [PMID:  15767542 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cost-related medication underuse: do patients with chronic illnesses tell their doctors?
Next Document:  Predictors of in-hospital mortality and attributable risks of death after ischemic stroke: the Germa...