Document Detail


When do we Believe Experts? The Power of the Unorthodox View.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23042647     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
This paper examines the extent to which orthodoxy (degree of typicality) and congruence (degree of similarity with own opinion) mediate the influence of expert advice on decision makers' judgments. Overall, 227 members of the public and 60 police officers completed an online questionnaire involving an investigation into a child sex offence. Participants were asked to first (i) formulate their own "profile" of a likely offender then (ii) estimate the guilt of two presented suspect descriptions (orthodox vs. unorthodox), and, following the presentation of an "expert's" profile that matched either the orthodox or the unorthodox suspect, (iii) re-evaluate their guilt judgments of the two suspects based on this new advice. Finally, (iv) the perceived similarity (congruence) between the participants' own and the expert profile was assessed. Results revealed two key findings. First, expert profiles that matched a suspect's description elevated perceptions of guilt in that suspect, whilst also, simultaneously, very significantly decreasing the perception of guilt of the alternative suspect. This suggests a powerful rejection and downward revision of the other suspect. Second, perceived similarity of the profile (to one's own profile) was only a significant factor in increasing guilt judgments when assigning guilt to the unorthodox (as opposed to orthodox) suspect. Comparisons of lay judgments with those of police officers revealed few significant differences in effects. The finding that advice is most influential when unorthodox and incongruent suggests that decision makers are more likely to reevaluate judgments when expert advice contributes novel information that contradicts their beliefs. The practical implications of these findings are discussed for profilers, police, and decision research in general. Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors:
Laurence Alison; Louise Almond; Paul Christiansen; Sara Waring; Nicola Power; Gaëlle Villejoubert
Related Documents :
9872877 - Social class in childhood and general health in adulthood: questionnaire study of contr...
23948387 - Illusion of control: the role of personal involvement.
582797 - Social distribution of sexually transmitted diseases. a survey of female clinic registr...
17531437 - Exploring the relationship between fear of positive evaluation and social anxiety.
21169857 - The experience and impact of living with gout: a study of men with chronic gout using a...
15917037 - Teacher tobacco use and tobacco use prevention in two regions in india: qualitative res...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2012-10-8
Journal Detail:
Title:  Behavioral sciences & the law     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1099-0798     ISO Abbreviation:  Behav Sci Law     Publication Date:  2012 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2012-10-8     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8404861     Medline TA:  Behav Sci Law     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2012 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Affiliation:
University of Liverpool, UK. l.j.alison@liverpool.ac.uk.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Survey Methods and Aging Research in an Arab Sociocultural Context--A Case Study from Beirut, Lebano...
Next Document:  Role of inflammatory dendritic cells in innate and adaptive immunity.