Document Detail


What really works.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12858710     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
When it comes to improving business performance, managers have no shortage of tools and techniques to choose from. But what really works? What's critical, and what's optional? Two business professors and a former McKinsey consultant set out to answer those questions. In a ground-breaking, five-year study that involved more than 50 academics and consultants, the authors analyzed 200 management techniques as they were employed by 160 companies over ten years. Their findings at a high level? Business basics really matter. In this article, the authors outline the management practices that are imperative for sustained superior financial performance--their "4+2 formula" for business success. They provide examples of companies that achieved varying degrees of success depending on whether they applied the formula, and they suggest ways that other companies can achieve excellence. The 160 companies in their study--called the Evergreen Project--were divided into 40 quads, each comprising four companies in a narrowly defined industry. Based on its performance between 1986 and 1996, each company in each quad was classified as either a winner (for instance, Dollar General), a loser (Kmart), a climber (Target), or a tumbler (the Limited). Without exception, the companies that outperformed their industry peers excelled in what the authors call the four primary management practices: strategy, execution, culture, and structure. And they supplemented their great skill in those areas with a mastery of any two of four secondary management practices: talent, leadership, innovation, and mergers and partnerships. A company that consistently follows this 4+2 formula has a better than 90% chance of sustaining superior performance, according to the authors.
Authors:
Nitin Nohria; William Joyce; Bruce Roberson
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Harvard business review     Volume:  81     ISSN:  0017-8012     ISO Abbreviation:  Harv Bus Rev     Publication Date:  2003 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-07-15     Completed Date:  2003-08-07     Revised Date:  2004-11-17    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9875796     Medline TA:  Harv Bus Rev     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  42-52, 116     Citation Subset:  H    
Affiliation:
Harvard Business School, Boston, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Benchmarking*
Commerce / classification,  organization & administration*,  standards
Diffusion of Innovation
Efficiency, Organizational
Humans
Leadership
Management Quality Circles
Organizational Affiliation
Organizational Culture
Organizational Innovation
Professional Competence
Research
Total Quality Management*
United States

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Capital versus talent. The battle that's reshaping business.
Next Document:  Delusions of success. How optimism undermines executives' decisions.