Document Detail


What principlism misses.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  19332578     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Principlism aims to provide a framework to help those working in medicine both to identify moral problems and to make decisions about what to do. For it to meet this aim, the principles included within it must express values that all morally serious people share (or ought to share), and there must be no other values that all morally serious people share (or ought to share). This paper challenges the latter of these claims. I will argue that as a descriptive claim about what values morally serious people do in fact share, principlism is inadequate; more principles would be needed to make this claim true. Furthermore, I will argue that while, taken as a claim about what principles we ought to share, principlism could turn out to be correct, it is either unsupported or unable to meet its aims. The only way in which principlists can avoid these problems is to add to the current four principles.
Authors:
Tom Walker
Related Documents :
10765438 - A decision theory perspective on the disposal of high-level radioactive waste.
12940798 - On what basis should the effectiveness of decision aids be judged?
17978428 - A new approach to aid urban water management decision making using trade-off sacrifice ...
15002698 - Making room for citizens at the public policy table.
17153268 - On teaching biopolicy and values in selected reproductive technologies: abortion, in vi...
15971768 - Dimensions of adolescent rebellion: risks for academic failure among high- and low-inco...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical ethics     Volume:  35     ISSN:  1473-4257     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Ethics     Publication Date:  2009 Apr 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2009-03-31     Completed Date:  2009-10-14     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7513619     Medline TA:  J Med Ethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  229-31; discussion 232-3     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Affiliation:
Centre for Professional Ethics, Keele University, Staffordshire, UK. t.walker@peak.keele.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Decision Making / ethics*
Ethical Analysis / methods
Ethics, Medical*
Humans
Physician-Patient Relations / ethics
Principle-Based Ethics*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Financial incentives for patients in the treatment of psychosis.
Next Document:  The justificatory power of moral experience.