Document Detail


What Are the Levels of Evidence on Which We Base Decisions for Surgical Management of Lower Extremity Bone Tumors?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  24081669     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Benign and malignant lower extremity primary bone tumors are among the least common conditions treated by orthopaedic surgeons. The literature supporting their surgical management has historically been in the form of observational studies rather than prospective controlled studies. Observational studies are prone to confounding bias, sampling bias, and recall bias.
QUESTIONS/PURPOSES: (1) What are the overall levels of evidence of articles published on the surgical management of lower extremity bone tumors? (2) What is the overall quality of reporting of studies in this field based on the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) checklist? (3) What are the most common pitfalls in reporting that authors might improve on?
METHODS: All studies describing the surgical management of lower extremity primary bone tumors from 2002 to 2012 were systematically reviewed. Two authors independently appraised levels of evidence. Quality of reporting was assessed with the STROBE checklist. Pitfalls in reporting were quantified by determining the 10 most underreported elements of research study design in the group of studies analyzed, again using the STROBE checklist as the reference standard. Of 1387 studies identified, 607 met eligibility criteria.
RESULTS: There were no Level I studies, two Level II studies, 47 Level III studies, 308 Level IV studies, and 250 Level V studies. The mean percentage of STROBE points reported satisfactorily in each article as graded by the two reviewers was 53% (95% confidence interval, 42%-63%). The most common pitfalls in reporting were failures to justify sample size (2.2% reported), examine sensitivity (2.2%), account for missing data (9.8%), and discuss sources of bias (14%). Followup (66%), precision of outcomes (64%), eligibility criteria (55%), and methodological limitations (53%) were variably reported.
CONCLUSIONS: Observational studies are the dominant evidence for the surgical management of primary lower extremity bone tumors. Numerous deficiencies in reporting limit their clinical use. Authors may use these results to inform future work and improve reporting in observational studies, and treating surgeons should be aware of these limitations when choosing among the various options with their patients.
Authors:
Nathan Evaniew; James Nuttall; Forough Farrokhyar; Mohit Bhandari; Michelle Ghert
Related Documents :
22340589 - Conflicting roles of molecules in hepatocarcinogenesis: paradigm or paradox.
8626749 - 13c and 31p nmr investigation of effect of 6-aminonicotinamide on metabolism of rif-1 t...
16274979 - Gadolinium incorporated reconstituted chylomicron emulsion for potential application in...
17851879 - Accuracy of mri for estimating residual tumor size after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in lo...
10933059 - Treatment of experimental brain tumors with trombospondin-1 derived peptides: an in viv...
10929299 - White-matter abnormalities in unirradiated patients cured of primary central nervous sy...
2723859 - Flow cytometric analysis of benign and malignant tumors of the oral and maxillofacial r...
22207549 - Notch: a key regulator of tumor angiogenesis and metastasis.
17763849 - Extensive fdg uptake and its modification with corticosteroid in a granuloma rat model:...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-10-1
Journal Detail:
Title:  Clinical orthopaedics and related research     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1528-1132     ISO Abbreviation:  Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res.     Publication Date:  2013 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-10-1     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0075674     Medline TA:  Clin Orthop Relat Res     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Affiliation:
Division of Orthopaedics, Department of Surgery, McMaster University, 293 Wellington Street North, Suite 110, Hamilton, ON, L8L 8E7, Canada.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Cemented versus Uncemented Hemiarthroplasty for Displaced Femoral Neck Fractures: 5-year Followup of...
Next Document:  Retinal Vessel Detection and Measurement for Computer-aided Medical Diagnosis.