|Weight variation over time and its association with tuberculosis treatment outcome: a longitudinal analysis.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 21494617 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|OBJECTIVE: Weight variation during therapy has been described as a useful marker to predict TB treatment outcome. No previous study has used longitudinal analysis to corroborate this finding. The goal of this study was to evaluate change and trends of patients' bodyweight over time depending on TB treatment outcome.
METHODS AND FINDINGS: A retrospective cohort study with all TB cases diagnosed from 2000 to 2006 was carried out. Information from 5 public tuberculosis treatment facilities at Pampas de San Juan de Miraflores, Lima, Peru was analyzed. Poor outcome was defined as failure or death during TB therapy, and compared to good outcome defined as cured. Longitudinal analysis with a pre-specified marginal model was fitted using Generalized Estimating Equations to compare weight trends for patients with good and poor outcome adjusting for potential confounders. A total of 460 patients (55.4% males, mean age: 31.6 years) were included in the analysis: 42 (9.1%) had a poor outcome (17 failed and 25 died). Weight at baseline was not different comparing outcome groups (p = 0.17). After adjusting for age, gender, type of TB, scheme of treatment, HIV status and sputum variation during follow-up, after the first month of treatment, patients with good outcome gained, on average, almost 1 kg compared to their baseline weight (p<0.001), whereas those with poor outcome lost 1 kg (p = 0.003). Similarly, after 4 months, a patient with good outcome increased 3 kg on average (p<0.001), while those with poor outcome only gained 0.2 kg (p = 0.02).
CONCLUSIONS: Weight variation during tuberculosis therapy follow-up can predict treatment outcome. Patients losing weight during TB treatment, especially in the first month, should be more closely followed as they are at risk of failure or death.
|Antonio Bernabe-Ortiz; Cesar P Carcamo; Juan F Sanchez; Julia Rios|
Related Documents :
|24076707 - Surgical management of patients with a history of early le fort iii advancement after t...
16391947 - Fast-track giant paraoesophageal hernia repair using a simplified laparoscopic technique.
24773877 - Characterization of edge effects with paclitaxel-eluting stents using serial intravascu...
12842737 - Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for symptoms of biliary colic in the absence of gallstones.
15032007 - The impact of radical prostatectomy on patient well-being: a prospective urodynamic stu...
24697847 - Geographical variation in incidence of knee arthroscopy for patients with osteoarthriti...
|Type: Journal Article Date: 2011-04-08|
|Title: PloS one Volume: 6 ISSN: 1932-6203 ISO Abbreviation: PLoS ONE Publication Date: 2011|
|Created Date: 2011-04-15 Completed Date: 2011-08-16 Revised Date: 2013-06-30|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 101285081 Medline TA: PLoS One Country: United States|
|Languages: eng Pagination: e18474 Citation Subset: IM|
|Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru. email@example.com|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
Body Weight / physiology*
Tuberculosis / drug therapy*, physiopathology*
Journal ID (nlm-ta): PLoS One
Journal ID (publisher-id): plos
Journal ID (pmc): plosone
Publisher: Public Library of Science, San Francisco, USA
Bernabe-Ortiz et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
Received Day: 6 Month: 1 Year: 2011
Accepted Day: 1 Month: 3 Year: 2011
collection publication date: Year: 2011
Electronic publication date: Day: 8 Month: 4 Year: 2011
Volume: 6 Issue: 4
E-location ID: e18474
PubMed Id: 21494617
Publisher Id: PONE-D-11-01653
|Weight Variation over Time and Its Association with Tuberculosis Treatment Outcome: A Longitudinal Analysis Alternate Title:Weight over Time and TB Treatment Outcome|
|Cesar P. Carcamo1|
|Juan F. Sanchez3|
1Epidemiology Unit, School of Public Health and Administration, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
2CRONICAS, Center of Excellence in Chronic Diseases, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia, Lima, Peru
3Parasitology Department, US Naval Medical Research Unit No. 6 (NAMRU-6), Lima, Peru
4National Health Strategy for Control and Prevention of Tuberculosis, DISA II Coordinator, Lima, Peru
|San Francisco General Hospital, University of California San Francisco, United States of America
|Correspondence: * E-mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
Contributed by footnote: Conceived and designed the experiments: AB-O CPC JFS JR. Performed the experiments: AB-O CPC JFS JR. Analyzed the data: AB-O CPC. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: AB-O CPC JFS JR. Wrote the paper: AB-O CPC JFS JR.
During 2009, 9.4 million new tuberculosis (TB) cases were estimated with about 3% occurring in the Americas . An estimated 440,000 cases were caused by multi-drug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) and Peru is one of the countries reporting cases of extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB) .
In most countries, TB patients usually receive MDR-TB testing if they fail to treatment after surviving at least 5 months of empiric therapy with a standardized first-line antibiotic regimen , . Peru has the highest rate of MDR-TB in the Americas, with 5.3% MDRTB in new TB cases, 24% in re-treatment cases and more than 200 cases of XDR-TB reported by 2008 , .
TB is a wasting disease , , ,  and bodyweight variation has been proposed as a practical anthropometric marker to predict TB treatment outcome , , , . Moreover, weight loss of 2 kg. or more during the first-month therapy has been considered as a potential risk factor for toxicity due to drugs . Many countries, including Peru, routinely weigh patients and repeat sputum microscopy tests on a monthly basis during therapy to assess treatment response. Several studies have reported that positive sputum microscopy at second month of treatment is associated with subsequent treatment failure, but is insensitive at population level , , , . Thus, patients' bodyweight might be a helpful and cheap test to predict TB treatment outcome. Although many papers have reported bodyweight as a marker to predict therapy failure, death or relapse, to our knowledge, no study has reported an appropriate longitudinal analysis of patients during TB treatment assessing bodyweight change over time. Longitudinal data analysis is a statistical technique that allows the direct study of within-individual change over time accounting for within-individual correlation in the analysis .
The objective of this paper was to assess change of patients' bodyweight over time depending on TB treatment outcome. This model was adjusted for several potential confounders. We hypothesized that the trends of patients' bodyweight with poor outcome, those who had died or failed during treatment, differed from those who had ended treatment as cured.
Data from a retrospective cohort of patients commencing tuberculosis therapy was used and analyzed for this study. This research used programmatic TB diagnosis, treatment monitoring and outcome data as recorded from the National Health Strategy for Prevention and Control of Tuberculosis (ESN-PCT) at 5 public tuberculosis treatment facilities in Pampas de San Juan de Miraflores, a periurban shantytown located at the south of Lima, Peru.
Patients included in the analysis were at least 18 years old and diagnosed with tuberculosis disease between 2000 and 2006. We deliberately choose these years because changes on TB treatment monitoring occurred starting 2007 in the ESN-PCT. We excluded patients if they were restarting partially completed or interrupted TB treatment or therapy had failed within the previous 12 months because this group has a high level of drug resistance and therefore, evolution of these patients is completely different , .
The main outcome of the study was bodyweight, recorded in kilograms (kg) from treatment start (baseline) and repeatedly measured in a monthly basis. For this study, only data from the first 5 months were used for analysis.
The ESN-PCT defines treatment failure based on positive sputum microscopy results after ≥5 months of treatment or reverting to positive after two consecutive negative monthly results . Deaths were defined as those patients who died during tuberculosis therapy follow-up. For our research, we dichotomized these programmatic outcomes in ‘cured’ (good outcome), or to have had an adverse or poor outcome (death or treatment failure, as previously defined).
Other variables of interest included in the analysis were: age measured in years, patient sex (male or female), type of tuberculosis (pulmonary vs. extra-pulmonary), treatment scheme (new vs. recurrent), change of sputum during treatment assessed monthly, and HIV status (positive vs. unknown). Since HIV test is not habitually performed among TB cases and no patients was found to be HIV negative, we categorized this variable as positive or unknown.
All patients were treated by the TB programme with empiric standardized first-line therapy and clinic-based direct-observation of every dose (DOTS approach) . The Peruvian TB programme uses monthly food packages as adherence incentives and these are standardized and given for all patients. Management of TB cases included programmatic monitoring with monthly sputum microscopy and weight (kg) measures . For microscopy, the TB programme used un-concentrated direct Ziehl-Neelsen smear microscopy with a well-established national quality assurance system. For weighing, data from records taking from the existing clinic scales and established programmatic training for their use was utilized. The accuracy of the scales used was not systematically confirmed but each patient was weighed repeatedly using the same scale and weights were generally recorded to the nearest 0.1 kg.
Data were analyzed using STATA version 11.0 for Windows (STATA Corporation, College Station, Texas, US). First, a brief description of demographic and clinical characteristics was tabulated. Second, weight was calculated for each group according to our outcome of interest and month of follow-up. Finally, a longitudinal analysis was carried out to evaluate weight change over time. A marginal model was fitted using Generalized Estimating Equations to model average weight trends for patients with good and poor outcome . The crude model was specified as follow:. In this model, the time variable was included as categorical because weight over time did not show linearity in the poor outcome group.
Quasi-likelihood under the independence model information criterion (QIC) , an extension of the Akaike's information criterion (AIC), was applied to find the best working correlation structure applicable for the proposed model. Additionally, the model was adjusted for potential confounders affecting both outcome and weight. Potential confounders included were age, sex, type of tuberculosis, treatment scheme, HIV status, and sputum microscopy result change during treatment. Wald test was used to report p-values, whereas robust standard errors were used to calculate 95% confidence intervals for each coefficient in the model.
Institutional review board (IRB) approval for this project was granted by Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Informed consent was waived by IRB because of use of routine and programmatic data of the National Health Strategy for Control and Prevention of Tuberculosis.
A total of 530 patients started tuberculosis treatment during the period of study and were eligible for this study; but, 20 moved away before starting treatment, 37 abandoned therapy, 11 had previous failures, and 2 had unknown outcomes. Therefore, 460 (87%) patients were included in the analysis, 55.4% of them were males and the mean age was 31.6 years (SD: 14.1; range: 18–80). Of the total, 42 (9.1%) had a poor outcome at the end of tuberculosis therapy (17 failed and 25 died). A brief description of patients' characteristics in relation to outcome status is shown in Table 1.
Table 2 shows a detailed description of weight variation during treatment follow-up without accounting for intra-subject correlation. There was no significant difference between weights of outcome groups at baseline (p = 0.12); however, on average, weight decreased in those who developed an adverse outcome whereas it increased among those who ended treatment as cured.
When assessing correlation structure for repeated measurements using QIC, the best working correlation was exchangeable. Other structures (auto-regressive, unstructured, and non-stationary) were evaluated with the model, but they did not achieve convergence. In any case, robust standard errors were used to handle misspecification of variance or correlation functions .
Results of crude and adjusted marginal models are shown in Table 3. Of interest, adjusted coefficient for adverse outcome was not significant (p = 0.17), indicating that the difference in weight (about 2 kg) among patients with poor and good outcome at baseline was not statistically different. However, the interaction terms together were significant (Wald test for interaction, p = 0.002) indicating that changes of weight over time among patients with poor outcome differed of those with good outcome (Figure 1). Based on the results of the adjusted model (Table 3), at the end of the first month, on average, patients with good outcome gained almost 1 kg (0.93 kg according to the adjusted model) compared to their baseline, whereas at the fourth month, weight increased about 3 kg. On the other hand, patients with poor outcome lost about 1 kg (0.97 kg according to the model) at the first month of therapy compared to the baseline, while gaining 0.2 kg after four months of treatment. Moreover, patients with poor outcome did not gain weight during the first two months of therapy.
This study shows that, after adjusting for potential confounders, the curve of weight over time among patients who developed adverse outcome is completely different from patients classified as cured at the end of follow-up. The association continues being statistically significant after having included the monthly sputum microscopy result as confounder , , , , pointing out that change in weight over time is an independent predictor of treatment outcome.
These findings might have an important impact on public health, especially in resource-constrained settings. Weight assessment might be an easy, cheap, and useful form to predict TB treatment outcome among patients receiving therapy. Weight after the end of the first month of therapy, characterized by bodyweight loss among those with poor outcome, might be very important to avoid deaths or failures. Remarkably, most of the divergence of weight over time occurred during the first month. After that, weight gain among poor outcome patients shows parallel trends compared to good outcome ones with, however, a lower rate. Prospective studies with standardized measurements are needed to corroborate these findings.
Tuberculosis is the archetypal wasting disease. The association of TB and nutrition status has long been evident, as older terms were used for tuberculosis such as the Greek term “phthisis” or “to waste away” . Some current guidelines mention that weight loss may indicate incipient treatment failure and have been recently included in our National Health Strategy for Control and Prevention of Tuberculosis . Recently, some studies have started to report that weight loss should be considered as clinically relevant , , , , . One previous study reported that moderate and severe malnutrition was a risk factor associated with early death during TB treatment in rural areas of Malawi . However, to our knowledge, no study has used longitudinal data analysis to show changes and trends of patients' bodyweight during treatment follow-up.
Previous studies have suggested an association between meager weight gain during tuberculosis therapy and risk of poor treatment outcome ,  or relapse . One of these studies reported that patients under DOTS gained 3.2 kg on average at the end of treatment. We found similar results in our good outcome group (3.3 kg at the end of five months of therapy) . The other two studies identified a cutoff of 5% weight gain to predict tuberculosis treatment outcome , . Khan et al used the 5% cutoff at the end of the intensive therapy phase (first two months) , whereas Krapp et al reported the usefulness of the same cutoff but at the end of the therapy . Our findings suggest that we can apply strategies as soon as the end of the first month to avoid deaths and failures, including MDR testing, supplemental nutrition and closer monitoring. A total of 16 of 17 patients who failed treatment in this study were diagnosed as MDR-TB cases after failing (data not shown). On the other hand, other two different studies have shown that appropriate therapy is associated with progressive nutritional recovery and restoration of nutrition-related markers , , but this cannot guarantee appropriate body restitution measured as total arm muscle circumference, fat mass, serum albumin, bone minerals and protein mass, despite marked weight gain in patients.
Strengths of this study include the use of programmatic data to assess bodyweight change among TB patients commencing treatment; the use of longitudinal analysis with the best working correlation structure taking into account several potential confounders including changes on sputum microscopy results during follow-up, one of the well-known predictors of TB treatment outcome; and the assessment of weight trends during 5 consecutive months after beginning therapy. Many studies have reported findings using bodyweight variation during the first two months , , or at the end of therapy , , , , but not analyzed trends of bodyweight over time.
However, this study has also several limitations. First, we joined potential treatment outcomes which might lead to misclassification. Although, we collected 6-years information, we only found a small number of failures and deaths occurred during the period of the study. However, our findings agreed with previous reports showing the association between weight and TB treatment outcome. Further studies with greater sample sizes are needed to corroborate our findings. Second, socioeconomic information, a very important variable to predict patients' weight, was not available from data. Nevertheless, our cohort was located in a poor, periurban shantytown community where members of TB-affected families have been determined to live on less that US$ 1 dollar per day. Third, during the period of the study, HIV infection status was not routinely determined among TB patients. As a result, misclassification can have occurred because cases detected were diagnosed due to suspect for the presence of symptoms or opportunistic infections. HIV prevalence found in this study (1.5%) was similar to previous reports in Peru though , . Finally, deaths due to TB occurred during the first months of therapy (64% of deaths took place before completing four month of therapy, which might have reduced the power to detect difference of weights at the fifth month of follow-up (Table 3). However, the use of generalized estimating equations can protect against missing data if this is believed to be at random. In addition, the idea of the paper was to evaluate how trends of bodyweight change would have occurred in real life using programmatic data for this purpose.
In summary, our findings reveal that trends and change of weight during tuberculosis therapy can predict treatment outcome. Thus, weight loss during the first month of therapy should be used as part of routinely clinical evaluation to take appropriate decisions. These patients should be more closely followed as they are at risk of adverse outcomes. Follow-up monitoring might include MDR diagnosis testing, supplemental nutrition, closer monitoring, HIV infection status, treatment of opportunistic infections, etc. Further studies are needed to find appropriate weight loss cutoff including sensitivity and specificity analysis, and assess the combination of sputum microscopy results with weight change over time to predict TB treatment outcomes.
Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Funding: The authors have no support or funding to report.
The authors would like to thank personnel from the health network at Pampas de San Juan de Miraflores, Lima, Peru, for helping us with data collection.
The views expressed in this article are those of the authors and do not necessarily reflect the official policy or position of the Department of the Navy, Department of Defense, nor the U.S. Government.
|1.||World Health OrganizationYear: 2010Global Tuberculosis Control. WHO: Geneva, Switzerland. World Health Organization.|
|2.||Becerra MC,Freeman J,Bayona J,Shin SS,Kim JY,et al. Year: 2000Using treatment failure under effective directly observed short-course chemotherapy programs to identify patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis410811410694087|
|3.||Gupta R,Espinal MA,Raviglione MC. Year: 2000Using treatment failure under effective directly observed short-course chemotherapy programs to identify patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis41089109111092726|
|4.||Asencios L,Quispe N,Mendoza-Ticona A,Leo E,Vasquez L,et al. Year: 2009[National surveillance of anti-drug resistance, Peru 2005–2006.Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica26278287|
|5.||Baldwin MR,Yori PP,Ford C,Moore DA,Gilman RH,et al. Year: 2004Tuberculosis and nutrition: disease perceptions and health seeking behavior of household contacts in the Peruvian Amazon.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis81484149115636496|
|6.||Cegielski JP,McMurray DN. Year: 2004The relationship between malnutrition and tuberculosis: evidence from studies in humans and experimental animals.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis828629815139466|
|7.||Schwenk A,Hodgson L,Wright A,Ward LC,Rayner CF,et al. Year: 2004Nutrient partitioning during treatment of tuberculosis: gain in body fat mass but not in protein mass.Am J Clin Nutr791006101215159230|
|8.||Schwenk A,Macallan DC. Year: 2000Tuberculosis, malnutrition and wasting.Curr Opin Clin Nutr Metab Care328529110929675|
|9.||Gillespie SH,Kennedy N. Year: 1998Weight as a surrogate marker of treatment response in tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis25225239626614|
|10.||Khan A,Sterling TR,Reves R,Vernon A,Horsburgh CR. Year: 2006Lack of weight gain and relapse risk in a large tuberculosis treatment trial.Am J Respir Crit Care Med17434434816709935|
|11.||Krapp F,Veliz JC,Cornejo E,Gotuzzo E,Seas C. Year: 2008Bodyweight gain to predict treatment outcome in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Peru.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis121153115918812045|
|12.||Vasantha M,Gopi PG,Subramani R. Year: 2009Weight gain in patients with tuberculosis treated under directly observed treatment short-course (DOTS).Indian J Tuberc565919402266|
|13.||Warmelink I,Ten Hacken NH,van der Werf TS,van Altena R. Year: 2011Weight loss during tuberculosis treatment is an important risk factor for drug-induced hepatotoxicity.Br J Nutr1053400820875187|
|14.||Chavez Pachas AM,Blank R,Smith Fawzi MC,Bayona J,Becerra MC,et al. Year: 2004Identifying early treatment failure on category I therapy for pulmonary tuberculosis in Lima Ciudad, Peru.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis8525814974746|
|15.||Horne DJ,Royce SE,Gooze L,Narita M,Hopewell PC,et al. Year: 2010Sputum monitoring during tuberculosis treatment for predicting outcome: systematic review and meta-analysis.Lancet Infect Dis1038739420510279|
|16.||Santha T,Garg R,Frieden TR,Chandrasekaran V,Subramani R,et al. Year: 2002Risk factors associated with default, failure and death among tuberculosis patients treated in a DOTS programme in Tiruvallur District, South India, 2000.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis678078812234133|
|17.||Fitzmaurice GM,Laird NM,Ware JH. Wiley-Interscience, editorYear: 2004Applied Longitudinal Analysis;New JerseyJohn Wiley & Sons, Inc|
|18.||de Salud Ministerio. Year: 2006Estrategia Sanitaria Nacional de Prevención y Control de la Tuberculosis: Norma Técnica de Salud para el Control de la Tuberculosis. Lima, Perú.|
|19.||Kawai V,Soto G,Gilman RH,Bautista CT,Caviedes L,et al. Year: 2006Tuberculosis mortality, drug resistance, and infectiousness in patients with and without HIV infection in Peru.Am J Trop Med Hyg751027103317172361|
|20.||Hardin J,Hilbe JM. Hall/CRC C, editorYear: 2003Generalized estimating equations;Washington DCCRC Press Company|
|21.||Salaniponi FM,Christensen JJ,Gausi F,Kwanjana JJ,Harries AD. Year: 1999Sputum smear status at two months and subsequent treatment outcome in new patients with smear-positive pulmonary tuberculosis.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis31047104810587328|
|22.||Zhao FZ,Levy MH,Wen S. Year: 1997Sputum microscopy results at two and three months predict outcome of tuberculosis treatment.Int J Tuberc Lung Dis15705729487456|
|23.||Van Lettow M,Fawzi WW,Semba RD. Year: 2003Triple trouble: the role of malnutrition in tuberculosis and human immunodeficiency virus co-infection.Nutr Rev61819012723640|
|24.||Yew WW,Leung CC. Year: 2006Prognostic significance of early weight gain in underweight patients with tuberculosis.Am J Respir Crit Care Med17423623716864715|
|25.||Zachariah R,Spielmann MP,Harries AD,Salaniponi FM. Year: 2002Moderate to severe malnutrition in patients with tuberculosis is a risk factor associated with early death.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg9629129412174782|
|26.||Onwubalili JK. Year: 1988Malnutrition among tuberculosis patients in Harrow, England.Eur J Clin Nutr423633663396528|
|27.||Kennedy N,Ramsay A,Uiso L,Gutmann J,Ngowi FI,et al. Year: 1996Nutritional status and weight gain in patients with pulmonary tuberculosis in Tanzania.Trans R Soc Trop Med Hyg901621668761578|
|28.||Swaminathan S,Padmapriyadarsini C,Sukumar B,Iliayas S,Kumar SR,et al. Year: 2008Nutritional status of persons with HIV infection, persons with HIV infection and tuberculosis, and HIV-negative individuals from southern India.Clin Infect Dis4694694918279043|
|29.||Bernabe-Ortiz A. Year: 2008[Factors associated with survival of patients with tuberculosis in Lima, Peru].Rev Chilena Infectol2510410718483640|
|30.||Shin SS,Yagui M,Ascencios L,Yale G,Suarez C,et al. Year: 2008Scale-up of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis laboratory services, Peru.Emerg Infect Dis1470170818439349|
Table 1 Characteristics of enrolled patients at baseline according to outcome status*.
|Variable||Good outcome(n = 418)||Poor outcome(n = 42)||p-value|
|Female||187 (44.7%)||18 (42.9%)||0.82|
|Male||231 (55.3%)||24 (57.1%)|
|Mean (SD)||30.8 (13.2)||39.4 (19.5)||<0.001|
|Type of tuberculosis|
|Extra-pulmonary||67 (16.1%)||7 (16.7%)||0.92|
|Pulmonary||350 (83.9%)||35 (83.3%)|
|Scheme of treatment|
|New||360 (86.1%)||28 (66.7%)||0.001|
|Recurrent||58 (13.9%)||14 (33.3%)|
|Negative||118 (29.0%)||9 (23.1%)||0.64|
|1+||155 (38.1%)||15 (38.5%)|
|2+||73 (17.9%)||10 (25.6%)|
|3+||61 (15.0%)||5 (12.8%)|
|Unknown||414 (9.0%)||39 (92.9%)||0.002|
|Yes||4 (1.0%)||3 (7.1%)|
|Days of follow-up|
|Mean (SD)||196 (38.6)||134 (74.9)||<0.001|
*Results may not add due to missing values.
**Only 7 patients were known to be HIV-positive because HIV testing is rarely performed.
Table 2 Weight change over time during follow-up according to outcome status.
|Weight (kg)||Treatment outcome|
|Good outcome||Poor outcome|
|N||Mean (SD)||N||Mean (SD)|
|Baseline||418||54.7 (8.3)||42||52.5 (9.2)|
|First month||412||56.0 (8.4)||39||50.6 (9.7)|
|Second month||405||56.8 (8.5)||33||49.5 (10.3)|
|Third month||401||57.7 (8.3)||29||51.7 (10.2)|
|Fourth month||389||58.3 (8.4)||26||53.7 (8.7)|
|Fifth month||389||58.7 (8.7)||18||51.0 (13.1)|
Table 3 Crude and adjusted marginal models assessing weight change over time according to outcome status.
|Crude model||Adjusted model*|
|Intercept||54.70||53.90; 55.50||<0.001||56.91||53.09; 60.73||<0.001|
|Poor outcome||−2.25||−5.13; 0.64||0.127||−2.07||−5.04; 0.90||0.172|
|Time (1st month)||1.46||1.24; 1.68||<0.001||0.93||0.54; 1.31||<0.001|
|Time (2nd month)||2.24||1.96; 2.52||<0.001||1.67||1.24; 2.10||<0.001|
|Time (3rd month)||3.01||2.68; 3.33||<0.001||2.42||1.95; 2.89||<0.001|
|Time (4th month)||3.58||3.23; 3.92||<0.001||2.97||2.49; 3.46||<0.001|
|Time (5th month)||3.93||3.56; 4.30||<0.001||3.33||2.82; 3.84||<0.001|
|Poor outcome* Time (1st month)||−2.35||−3.54; −1.15||<0.001||−1.90||−3.16; −0.64||0.003|
|Poor outcome* Time (2nd month)||−3.18||−4.98; −1.39||0.001||−2.56||−4.32; −0.80||0.004|
|Poor outcome* Time (3rd month)||−2.90||−5.16; −0.64||0.012||−2.05||−3.64; −0.46||0.011|
|Poor outcome* Time (4th month)||−3.41||−5.58; −1.25||0.002||−2.81||−5.15; −0.48||0.018|
|Poor outcome* Time (5th month)||−3.07||−5.75; −0.39||0.025||−1.25||−3.76; 1.27||0.331|
*Adjusted by age, gender, type of tuberculosis, scheme of treatment, HIV status, and sputum variation during follow-up.
Previous Document: Meta-analysis of TNF 308 G/A polymorphism and type 2 diabetes mellitus.
Next Document: CNS expression of B7-H1 regulates pro-inflammatory cytokine production and alters severity of Theile...