Document Detail


Wavefront-guided LASIK for the correction of primary myopia and astigmatism a report by the American Academy of Ophthalmology.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  18598819     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To describe wavefront-guided (WFG) LASIK for the primary treatment of low to moderate levels of myopia and astigmatism and to examine the evidence on the safety and effectiveness of the procedure in comparison with conventional LASIK. METHODS: Literature searches conducted in 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007 retrieved 209 unique references from the PubMed and Cochrane Library databases. The panel selected 65 articles to review, and of these, chose 45 articles that they considered to be of sufficient clinical relevance to submit to the panel methodologist for review. During the review and preparation of this assessment, an additional 2 articles were included. A level I rating was assigned to properly conducted, well-designed, randomized clinical trials; a level II rating was assigned to well-designed cohort and case-controlled studies; and a level III rating was assigned to case series, case reports, and poorly designed prospective and retrospective studies. In addition, studies that were conducted by laser manufacturers before device approval (premarket approval) were reviewed as a separate category of evidence. RESULTS: The assessment describes studies reporting results of WFG LASIK clinical trials, comparative trials, or both of WFG and conventional LASIK that were rated level II and level III. There were no studies rated as level I evidence. Four premarket approval studies conducted by 4 laser manufacturers were included in the assessment. The assessment did not compare study results or laser platforms because there were many variables, including the amount of follow-up, the use of different microkeratomes, and the level of preoperative myopia and astigmatism. CONCLUSIONS: There is substantial level II and level III evidence that WFG LASIK is safe and effective for the correction of primary myopia or primary myopia and astigmatism and that there is a high level of patient satisfaction. Microkeratome and flap-related complications are not common but can occur with WFG LASIK, just as with conventional LASIK. The WFG procedure seems to have similar or better refractive accuracy and uncorrected visual acuity outcomes compared with conventional LASIK. Likewise, there is evidence of improved contrast sensitivity and fewer visual symptoms, such as glare and halos at night, compared with conventional LASIK. Even though the procedure is designed to measure and treat both lower- and higher-order aberrations (HOAs), the latter are generally increased after WFG LASIK. The reasons for the increase in HOA are likely multifactorial, but the increase typically is less than that induced by conventional LASIK. No long-term assessment of WFG LASIK was possible because of the relatively short follow-up (12 months or fewer) of most of the studies reviewed.
Authors:
Steven C Schallhorn; Ayad A Farjo; David Huang; Brian S Boxer Wachler; William B Trattler; David J Tanzer; Parag A Majmudar; Alan Sugar;
Related Documents :
16363279 - The response of skin perfusion and of rheological and immunological variables to intrav...
6207209 - New approaches to drug selection and serial drug testing.
23198909 - ( 1 )h nmr study on the short- and long-term impact of two training programs of sprint ...
16483909 - Changing life-styles and osteoarthritis: what is the evidence?
19647149 - Exercise interventions in fibromyalgia: clinical applications from the evidence.
24369889 - A review of nationwide radioactivity comparisons on gamma-ray spectrometry organized by...
7243889 - Electromyographic activity recorded from an unexercised muscle during maximal isometric...
19705329 - Activity profile and physical demands of football referees and assistant referees in in...
18645359 - Improvement in early oxygen uptake kinetics with left ventricular assist device support.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Ophthalmology     Volume:  115     ISSN:  1549-4713     ISO Abbreviation:  Ophthalmology     Publication Date:  2008 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2008-07-07     Completed Date:  2008-07-15     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  7802443     Medline TA:  Ophthalmology     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  1249-61     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
American Academy of Ophthalmology, Quality Care and Knowledge Base Development, P.O. Box 7424, San Francisco, CA 94120-7424, USA.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Academies and Institutes / organization & administration
Astigmatism / surgery*
Contrast Sensitivity
Corneal Stroma / surgery*
Corneal Topography
Humans
Keratomileusis, Laser In Situ / methods*
Lasers, Excimer / adverse effects,  therapeutic use*
Myopia / surgery*
Ophthalmology / organization & administration
Patient Satisfaction
Surgical Flaps
Technology Assessment, Biomedical*
Treatment Outcome
Visual Acuity

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Longitudinal rates of postoperative adverse outcomes after glaucoma surgery among medicare beneficia...
Next Document:  The effects of sulfurous-arsenical-ferruginous thermal water nasal irrigation in wound healing after...