Document Detail


Was bioethics founded on historical and conceptual mistakes about medical paternalism?
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21175709     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
Bioethics has a founding story in which medical paternalism, the interference with the autonomy of patients for their own clinical benefit, was an accepted ethical norm in the history of Western medical ethics and was widespread in clinical practice until bioethics changed the ethical norms and practice of medicine. In this paper I show that the founding story of bioethics misreads major texts in the history of Western medical ethics. I also show that a major source for empirical claims about the widespread practice of medical paternalism has been misread. I then show that that bioethics based on its founding story deprofessionalizes medical ethics. The result leaves the sick exposed to the predatory power of medical practitioners and healthcare organizations with only their autonomy-based rights to non-interference, expressed in contracts, to protect them. The sick are stripped of the protection afforded by a professional, fiduciary relationship of physicians to their patients. Bioethics based on its founding story reverts to the older model of a contractual relationship between the sick and medical practitioners not worthy of intellectual or moral trust (because such trust cannot be generated by what I call 'deprofessionalizing bioethics'). On closer examination, bioethics based on its founding story, ironically, eliminates paternalism as a moral category in bioethics, thus causing bioethics to collapse on itself because it denies one of the necessary conditions for medical paternalism. Bioethics based on its founding story should be abandoned.
Authors:
Laurence B McCullough
Related Documents :
2600359 - Financing medical illustration in the academic environment.
14567269 - Designs that make a difference: the cardiac universal bed model.
2208869 - The martyrdom of doctor andreas vesalius.
23427479 - Methodology and bias in assessing compliance with a surgical safety checklist.
24327309 - Teamwork assessment in internal medicine: a systematic review of validity evidence and ...
23602389 - Psychometric properties and validation of the satisfaction with life scale in psychiatr...
2022119 - The culture and history of psychiatric stigma in early modern and modern western societ...
15795729 - Reassessing the methods of medical record review studies in emergency medicine research.
12708859 - Evaluation of multivalent dendrimers based on melamine: kinetics of thiol-disulfide exc...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Bioethics     Volume:  25     ISSN:  1467-8519     ISO Abbreviation:  Bioethics     Publication Date:  2011 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-12-23     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8704792     Medline TA:  Bioethics     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  66-74     Citation Subset:  E; IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
Affiliation:
Center for Medical Ethics and Health Policy, Baylor College of Medicine, One Baylor Plaza MS 420, Houston, TX 77030-3411, USA. mccullou@bcm.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Personal genomes: no bad news?
Next Document:  Looking backwards, looking forward: hopes for bioethics' next twenty-five years.