Document Detail


WITHDRAWN: Vacuum extraction versus forceps for assisted vaginal delivery.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21069665     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Proponents of vacuum delivery argue that it should be chosen first for assisted vaginal delivery, because it is less likely to injure the mother.
OBJECTIVES: The objective of this review was to assess the effects of vacuum extraction compared to forceps, on failure to achieve delivery and maternal and neonatal morbidity.
SEARCH STRATEGY: We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group trials register. Date of last search: February 1999.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Acceptably controlled comparisons of vacuum extraction and forceps delivery.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two reviewers independently assessed trial quality and extracted data. Study authors were contacted for additional information.
MAIN RESULTS: Ten trials were included. The trials were of reasonable quality. Use of the vacuum extractor for assisted vaginal delivery when compared to forceps delivery was associated with significantly less maternal trauma (odds ratio 0.41, 95% confidence interval 0.33 to 0.50) and with less general and regional anaesthesia. There were more deliveries with vacuum extraction (odds ratio 1.69, 95% confidence interval 1.31 to 2.19). Fewer caesarean sections were carried out in the vacuum extractor group. However the vacuum extractor was associated with an increase in neonatal cephalhaematomata and retinal haemorrhages. Serious neonatal injury was uncommon with either instrument.
AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Use of the vacuum extractor rather than forceps for assisted delivery appears to reduce maternal morbidity. The reduction in cephalhaematoma and retinal haemorrhages seen with forceps may be a compensatory benefit.
Authors:
Richard Johanson; Vijay Menon
Related Documents :
4027105 - Extradural analgesia in the management of singleton breech delivery.
10389715 - Selection of delivery method in pregnancies complicated by autoimmune thrombocytopenia:...
19780735 - Kjelland's forceps in the new millennium. maternal and neonatal outcomes of attempted r...
12180785 - Vaginal microbiota in healthy pregnant women and prenatal screening of group b streptoc...
16238535 - The assessment of fetal behavior in early pregnancy: comparison between 2d and 4d sonog...
8462605 - Pregnancy after high therapeutic doses of iodine-131 in differentiated thyroid cancer: ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article; Review     Date:  2010-11-10
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Cochrane database of systematic reviews     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1469-493X     ISO Abbreviation:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Publication Date:  2010  
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-11-11     Completed Date:  2010-12-06     Revised Date:  2013-06-28    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100909747     Medline TA:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  CD000224     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
(Deceased) North Staffordshire Hospital NHS Trust, Stoke-on-Trent, UK.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Extraction, Obstetrical
Female
Humans
Obstetrical Forceps*
Pregnancy
Vacuum Extraction, Obstetrical*
Comments/Corrections
Update Of:
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD000224   [PMID:  10796182 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  WITHDRAWN: Antihistamines versus aspirin for itching in late pregnancy.
Next Document:  WITHDRAWN: Soft versus rigid vacuum extractor cups for assisted vaginal delivery.