Document Detail

Voice recognition versus transcriptionist: error rates and productivity in MRI reporting.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  20958938     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Process    
PURPOSE: Despite the frequent introduction of voice recognition (VR) into radiology departments, little evidence still exists about its impact on workflow, error rates and costs. We designed a study to compare typographical errors, turnaround times (TAT) from reported to verified and productivity for VR-generated reports versus transcriptionist-generated reports in MRI.
METHODS: Fifty MRI reports generated by VR and 50 finalized MRI reports generated by the transcriptionist, of two radiologists, were sampled retrospectively. Two hundred reports were scrutinised for typographical errors and the average TAT from dictated to final approval. To assess productivity, the average MRI reports per hour for one of the radiologists was calculated using data from extra weekend reporting sessions.
RESULTS: Forty-two % and 30% of the finalized VR reports for each of the radiologists investigated contained errors. Only 6% and 8% of the transcriptionist-generated reports contained errors. The average TAT for VR was 0 h, and for the transcriptionist reports TAT was 89 and 38.9 h. Productivity was calculated at 8.6 MRI reports per hour using VR and 13.3 MRI reports using the transcriptionist, representing a 55% increase in productivity.
CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate that VR is not an effective method of generating reports for MRI. Ideally, we would have the report error rate and productivity of a transcriptionist and the TAT of VR.
Rodney H Strahan; Michal E Schneider-Kolsky
Related Documents :
20958938 - Voice recognition versus transcriptionist: error rates and productivity in mri reporting.
15486168 - Relative user ratings of mmpi-2 computer-based test interpretations.
24019658 - Simultaneous occurrence of graves' disease in eutopic and ectopic thyroid tissues: a ca...
24156178 - Thyrotoxic hypokalemic periodic paralysis: two case reports and a brief review of liter...
999088 - Dermatofibrosarcoma protruberans: analysis of eight cases in an african population.
14677798 - Photosensitivity reaction in a woman using an herbal supplement containing ginseng, gol...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of medical imaging and radiation oncology     Volume:  54     ISSN:  1754-9485     ISO Abbreviation:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol     Publication Date:  2010 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2010-10-20     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101469340     Medline TA:  J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol     Country:  Australia    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  411-4     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
© 2010 The Authors. Journal of Medical Imaging and Radiation Oncology © 2010 The Royal Australian and New Zealand College of Radiologists.
Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Monash Medical Centre, Southern Health, Clayton, Victoria, Australia.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  A review of methods of analysis in contouring studies for radiation oncology.
Next Document:  Variation in mammographic appearance between projections of small breast cancers compared with radia...