|Visualizing transient low-populated structures of RNA.|
|Jump to Full Text|
|PMID: 23041928 Owner: NLM Status: MEDLINE|
|The visualization of RNA conformational changes has provided fundamental insights into how regulatory RNAs carry out their biological functions. The RNA structural transitions that have been characterized so far involve long-lived species that can be captured by structure characterization techniques. Here we report the nuclear magnetic resonance visualization of RNA transitions towards 'invisible' excited states (ESs), which exist in too little abundance (2-13%) and for too short a duration (45-250 μs) to allow structural characterization by conventional techniques. Transitions towards ESs result in localized rearrangements in base-pairing that alter building block elements of RNA architecture, including helix-junction-helix motifs and apical loops. The ES can inhibit function by sequestering residues involved in recognition and signalling or promote ATP-independent strand exchange. Thus, RNAs do not adopt a single conformation, but rather exist in rapid equilibrium with alternative ESs, which can be stabilized by cellular cues to affect functional outcomes.|
|Elizabeth A Dethoff; Katja Petzold; Jeetender Chugh; Anette Casiano-Negroni; Hashim M Al-Hashimi|
Related Documents :
|24304298 - A new cyclic tetrapeptide from an endophytic streptomyces sp. yim67005.
19370918 - Brown seaweed defensive chemicals: a structure-activity relationship approach for the m...
23895588 - Male genitalia of neotropical charaxinae: a comparative analysis of character variation.
11281848 - Development of response-selective agonists of human c5a anaphylatoxin: conformational, ...
23688288 - Analyzing the visible conformational substates of the fk506-binding protein fkbp12.
7492318 - Evaluation of the extent of the binding site in human tissue kallikrein by synthetic su...
|Type: Journal Article; Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural; Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't Date: 2012-10-07|
|Title: Nature Volume: 491 ISSN: 1476-4687 ISO Abbreviation: Nature Publication Date: 2012 Nov|
|Created Date: 2012-11-29 Completed Date: 2013-01-16 Revised Date: 2013-07-11|
Medline Journal Info:
|Nlm Unique ID: 0410462 Medline TA: Nature Country: England|
|Languages: eng Pagination: 724-8 Citation Subset: IM|
|Department of Chemistry & Biophysics, University of Michigan, 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, Michigan 48109-1055, USA.|
|APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex|
HIV Long Terminal Repeat / genetics*
HIV-1 / genetics*
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance, Biomolecular
Nucleic Acid Conformation*
RNA, Viral / chemistry*, genetics
Ribosomes / chemistry, metabolism
|R01 AI066975/AI/NIAID NIH HHS; R01 AI066975/AI/NIAID NIH HHS|
Journal ID (nlm-journal-id): 0410462
Journal ID (pubmed-jr-id): 6011
Journal ID (nlm-ta): Nature
Journal ID (iso-abbrev): Nature
nihms-submitted publication date: Day: 13 Month: 8 Year: 2012
Electronic publication date: Day: 07 Month: 10 Year: 2012
Print publication date: Day: 29 Month: 11 Year: 2012
pmc-release publication date: Day: 29 Month: 5 Year: 2013
Volume: 491 Issue: 7426
First Page: 724 Last Page: 728
PubMed Id: 23041928
|Visualizing Transient Low-Populated Structures of RNA|
|Elizabeth A. Dethoff1*|
|Hashim M. Al-Hashimi1†|
1Department of Chemistry & Biophysics, University of Michigan, 930 North University Avenue, Ann Arbor, MI 48109-1055, USA, Tel: 734-615-3361, Fax: 734-647-4865
|†Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to H.M.A. (email@example.com)
*These authors contributed equally to this work.
2Current address: NYMIRUM, 3510 West Liberty Road, Ann Arbor, MI 48103
[equal] E.A.D., K.P. and J.C contributed equally to this work.
Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) relaxation dispersion methods1,2, which measure micro-to-millisecond conformational exchange, have made it possible to characterize the transient, low-populated exited state (ES) structures of proteins2,3 and to establish their importance in catalysis4, folding5,6, signaling7, and recognition8. These ESs exist in too little abundance (typically with populations <5 %) and for too short periods of time (lifetime <milliseconds) to allow structural characterization by conventional techniques. Recent advances that extend the time-scale sensitivity of rotating frame (R1ρ) carbon relaxation dispersion experiments have made it possible to fully characterize exchange processes in nucleic acids9–11, culminating in the discovery of ES Hoogsteen base-pairs in DNA12. Although evidence for RNA ESs has been reported for decades, their structure and role in function have remained elusive13–15.
Here, we report a strategy for characterizing the ES structures of RNA that combines R1ρ NMR experiments, mutagenesis, and secondary structure prediction. With this approach, we visualized ES structures for three distinct RNAs and obtained insights into their biological functions.
We used a low spinlock field R1ρ NMR experiment9–11 to measure micro-to-millisecond conformational exchange at sugar (C1′) and nucleobase (C8 and C6) carbon sites in the well studied hexanucleotide apical loop of the transactivation response element (TAR)16 from the human immunodeficiency virus type-1 (HIV-1). The TAR apical loop is a flexible recognition site that allows adaptive binding to a variety of proteins17. We observed conformational exchange (Fig. 1b and Supplementary Fig. 1) at carbon sites spread throughout the entire TAR apical loop (Fig. 1a). The R1ρ data could be collectively fitted to a two-state ( GS⇄k-1k1ES) exchange process that is directed towards an ES with population pES ~13 % and lifetime (τES = 1/k−1) of ~45 μs (Supplementary Table 1). A slower exchange process is observed at G33-C1′, G33-C8, and A35-C8 (pES <1 % and τES = 1.9–2.3 ms) which can be assigned to a distinct higher energy ES that will not be discussed further (Supplementary Discussion and Supplementary Fig. 5).
In the ground state (GS), apical loop residues exist in equilibrium between C2′-endo and C3′-endo sugar puckers, G34 forms a flexible cross-loop C30-G34 Watson-Crick (WC) base-pair, while the bases of U31, G32, and A35 are flexible18,19. To gain insights into the ES structure, we examined the sugar and base ES carbon chemical shifts (ωES) obtained from the two-state analysis of the R1ρ data, which are sensitive reporters of base stacking, sugar pucker, and syn versus anti glycosidic angles20. The downfield shifted sugar ES C30-C1′, U31-C1′, and A35-C1′ chemical shifts strongly suggest that in the ES, these residues adopt a pure C3′-endo sugar pucker characteristic of a helical conformation (Fig. 1a and Supplementary Table 1). The downfield shifted base ES G34-C8 can unambiguously be assigned to a syn base21 (Supplementary Discussion) and has a chemical shift that is highly characteristic of a UUCG tetraloop, which features a trans-wobble G-U base-pair22. Strikingly, TAR can accommodate a similar U31G32G33G34 tetraloop. This places G34 in a syn position, where it can base-pair with U31, thus explaining exchange at U31-C6. It also leads to formation of C30-A35 and U31-G34 non-canonical closing base-pairs, explaining the helical conformation observed for these residues in the ES. Transitions towards this ES require disruption of the cross-strand C30-G34 base-pair, explaining the measured activation free energy (12.6 kcal/mol) (Supplementary Fig. 2), which is at the low-end of the free energy range required to open RNA WC base-pairs (13–16 kcal/mol)23. This ES is also predicted to be the second most energetically favorable conformation using the secondary structure prediction program MC-Fold24 (Supplementary Fig. 3).
We used a ‘Mutate-and-Chemical-Shift-Fingerprint’ (MCSF) strategy to test the proposed TAR ES. Here, a mutation or chemical modification is introduced to stabilize (or destabilize) a candidate ES, and the mutant’s NMR carbon chemical shift fingerprints are compared with those of the ES (or GS). We stabilized the proposed TAR ES using two point mutations, C30U (TAR-C30U) and A35G (TAR-A35G), that replace the ES C30-A35 non-canonical base-pair with more stable WC U30-A35 and C30-G35 base-pairs, respectively (Fig. 1c). Both mutants adopted the proposed ES structure, as confirmed by NMR (Supplementary Fig. 4) and relative to wild-type (wt) TAR, featured large changes in the carbon chemical shifts specifically at sites showing exchange that are directed toward the ES chemical shifts (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 5). Inversely, we destabilized the ES by introducing a bulky N6-N6-dimethyl-substituent at the A35-N6 position (TAR-A35-DMA) (Fig. 1c), which impairs formation of the ES C30-A35 base-pair without affecting the bulged out A35 GS conformation. This modification quenched the chemical exchange (Supplementary Fig. 1) and resulted in oppositely shifted chemical shift perturbations that are directed towards the GS (Fig. 1d). It also allowed observation of the A35-C2H2 resonance, which was otherwise severely exchange-broadened (Supplementary Fig. 4), possibly due to protonation of A35-N1 and formation of an ES A35+-C30 wobble bases-pair15,25. Indeed, we were able to stabilize the ES by reducing the pH from 6.4 to 4.6 as verified by analysis of carbon chemical shifts and NOEs (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1, 4 and 5). Conversely, increasing the pH to 7.4 stabilized the GS and quenched the chemical exchange (Fig. 1d and Supplementary Fig. 1).
What is the functional significance of the TAR ES? The ES sequesters U31, G34, C30, and A35 into base-pairs, such that they are no longer available to bind the viral transactivator protein Tat and human Cyclin T1 (Fig. 1e), which together activate transcription of the HIV-1 genome. Strikingly, analysis of prior mutations reveals that mutants that stabilize the TAR ES inhibit Tat/Cyclin T1 binding and transcriptional activation, whereas mutants that do not stabilize the ES have little to no effect26–28 (Supplementary Fig. 6). The TAR ES is destabilized relative to the GS by only ~1.1 kcal/mol (Supplementary Fig. 2), and can readily become >50 % populated upon binding to one of several proteins known to bind TAR and interact with the apical loop17, or by other physiochemical parameters such as the lowering of pH. The TAR ES may be involved in down-regulating transactivation of the HIV genome or provide a mechanism for releasing Tat and Cycin T1. Although these functional roles remain to be verified, stabilizing the auto-inhibited TAR ES state immediately provides a new route for targeting TAR in the development of anti-HIV therapeutics.
We used our strategy to characterize the ES structure of the ribosomal A-site internal loop29 (Fig. 2a). The A-site plays essential roles in decoding messenger RNA (mRNA) by flipping out two internal-loop adenines (A1492 and A1493, referred to hereafter as A92 and A93), which interact with and stabilize the codon-anticodon mini-helix formed between the cognate aminoacyl tRNA and mRNA29,30 (see Fig. 2e). We observed extensive carbon chemical exchange at seven residues within and below the A-site internal loop (Fig. 2a, b and Supplementary Fig. 1). A two-state analysis of the R1ρ data revealed a global exchange process directed toward an ES with population pES ~2.5 % and lifetime τES = 1/k−1 ~ 248 μs (Supplementary Table 1).
Biophysical studies show that in the GS, A92 is looped inside, likely base-pairing with A08, while A93 is partially flipped out and flexible31 (Fig. 2a). An ES involving the flipping out of A92 and A93, as observed in several X-ray and NMR structures of drug-bound A-site32, can be ruled out based on the observation of exchange below the internal loop, ES chemical shift fingerprints that suggest increased stacking for A93 (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5), and by comparison of ES chemical shifts with those of drug-bound A-site (Supplementary Fig. 7).
Rather, the breadth of exchange across many different residues points to a larger structural rearrangement. The downfield shifted base ES chemical shift for U95-C6 indicates looping out of U95, whereas the upfield shifted base carbon ES chemical shifts indicate increased stacking for A92, A93, G94, and C96 (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). These data can be explained by an alternative structure in which U95 bulges out while A93-C07, G94-U06, and A08-A92 form three consecutive non-canonical base-pairs (Fig. 2a and Supplementary Table 1). A transition towards such an ES requires the opening of C07-G94, explaining the sizable free energy barrier of ~14.8 kcal/mol (Supplementary Fig. 2)23. This ES is predicted by MC-Fold to be the second most energetically favorable secondary structure (Supplementary Fig. 3) and has previously been observed in molecular dynamics simulations33.
We confirmed the proposed A-site ES using MCSF analysis. We were able to block transitions towards the ES by replacing U06-U95 with a more stable WC G06-C95 base-pair (A-site-U06G/U95C) (Fig. 2c). This locked A-site into the GS as judged by the GS-like chemical shifts (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5) and absence of chemical exchange, including at sites (e.g. A92 and A93), which are distant from the site of mutation (Supplementary Fig. 1). This also confirmed that all sites experience a common global exchange process. We then stabilized the proposed ES by deleting U95, which bulges out in the ES (A-site-ΔU95), and by introducing a methyl group at U95-N3 (A-site-U95-N3M) which is expected to disrupt the GS U06-U95 non-canonical base-pair in favor of the bulged out ES conformation (Fig. 2c). The A-site-ΔU95 mutant adopted the proposed ES structure as confirmed by NMR (Supplementary Fig. 4) and resulted in large changes in the carbon chemical shifts specifically at sites showing exchange that are directed toward the ES chemical shifts (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5). More dramatically, the A-site-U95-N3M mutant exhibited two equally populated sets of resonances in slow exchange on the NMR timescale (Supplementary Fig. 4), with one set corresponding to the GS, and the other in near perfect agreement with the ES (Fig. 2d and Supplementary Fig. 5).
The A-site ES sequesters A92 and A93 into base-pairs, making them unavailable to decode mRNA. It also affects the structural presentation of A-site residues involved in protein recognition and formation of the B2a inter-subunit cross bridge (Fig. 2a and 2e). Thus, we analyzed prior mutational data in light of the ES A-site structure determined here. Interestingly, mutants that are predicted to stabilize the A-site ES increase the rates of stop-codon read-through and frame-shifting, both of which are processes that can bypass mRNA decoding34, or inhibit binding of Initiation Factor 1(35) (Supplementary Fig. 6). In addition, the introduction of chemical groups at the U95-N3 position, a modification that is analogous to that which we used to trap the A-site ES, leads to severely impaired association of ribosomal subunits in vitro due to disruption of the B2a inter-subunit cross bridge36. This provides strong evidence that the A-site ES can form within the ribosome context where it can affect function. While X-ray structures of the ribosome show A-site in a GS-like conformation, in several cases, the electron density at the A-site is poor as judged by elevated B-factors, and can accommodate the ES conformation determined here (data not shown). The A-site ES invites reassessment of the A-site region in current ribosome structures and suggests a new route for targeting A-site in the development of antibiotics.
Finally, we used our strategy to study the ES structure of the HIV-1 stem loop 1 (SL1) (Fig. 3a). SL1 spontaneously forms kissing dimers, which isomerize during viral maturation into more stable duplex dimers through mechanisms that remain poorly understood37–39 (see Fig. 3e). This isomerization requires the melting and re-annealing of the SL1 hairpin and is catalyzed in vivo by the nucleic acid chaperone nucleocapsid protein (NC), but can also occur spontaneously in vitro39–41. A highly conserved asymmetric SL1 internal loop is essential for both NC-dependent and spontaneous isomerization42 and has been shown to induce complex NMR chemical exchange43,44.
We observed extensive conformational exchange in a monomeric SL1m construct (SL1m)43,45 spanning seven base-pairs in and around the internal loop (Fig. 3a, b and Supplementary Fig. 1). Unlike A-site, the exchange extends to residues both below and above the internal loop (Fig. 3a) and cannot be globally fitted to a single process (Supplementary Table 1). Rather, at least two distinct ESs (ES1 and ES2) need to be invoked that are sensed by residues above (ES1, pES1 ~9%, τES1 = 1/k−1 ~120 μs) and below (ES2, pES2 ~2 %, τES2 = 1/k−2 ~200 μs) the internal loop (Fig. 3a). Interestingly, MC-Fold also predicts a complex energy landscape for SL1m with several isoenergetic secondary structures that feature variable degrees of upward or downward migration of the bulge (Supplementary Fig. 3). This, together with the ES carbon chemical shift fingerprints and MCSF analysis led us to deduce structures for ES1 and ES2 that feature upward and downward migration of the bulge, respectively (Supplementary Discussion).
In ES1, the bulge migrates upward by three base-pairs43–46. Here, G29-G28 swap base-pairing partners with A27-G26, A27 swaps with A25, and G26-A25 are bulged out (Fig. 3a). We stabilized ES1 using two point mutants (SL1m-G8C and SL1m-G8U) that replace the ES G8-G29 mismatch with the more stable C8-G29 and U8-G29 base-pairs (Fig. 3c). Both mutants adopted the ES1 structure as verified by NMR (Supplementary Fig. 4) and relative to wt-SL1m, resulted in large changes in carbon chemical shifts for residues within (G28 and G29) and above (A25, G26 and A27) the internal loop that are directed towards the ES chemical shifts (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 5). In ES2, the bulge migrates downward by two base-pairs. Here, G28-G29 swap base-pairing partners with C30-G31, which are now bulged out (Fig. 3a). We stabilized ES2 by replacing the ES2 G7-G28/G8-A27 mismatches with C7-G28/U8-A27 WC base-pairs (Fig. 3c). This double mutant (SL1m-G7C/G8U) adopted the proposed ES2 structure as verified by NMR (Supplementary Fig. 4) and resulted in large changes in the carbon chemical shifts for residues within (G28 and G29) and below (C30 and G31) the internal loop that are directed towards the ES chemical shifts (Fig. 3d). Mutant mimics of ES1 and ES2 induce similar chemical shift perturbations for G28 (C8 and C1′) and G29 (C8) as expected given that they form base-pairs in the two cases (Fig. 3a, Supplementary Fig. 5, and Supplementary Discussion). Strikingly, mutants that stabilize residues above the bulge in their ES conformation also stabilize residues below the bulge in their GS conformation and vice versa. (Fig. 3d and Supplementary Fig. 5). This supports the mutual exclusivity of ES1 and ES2 (Fig. 3a); ‘trapping’ the bulge in the upper (or lower helix) prevents downward (or upward) migration and therefore traps residues in the lower (or upper) helix in their GS.
Together, the GS, ES1, and ES2 define a moving zipper in which bulge residues invade base-pairs in the upper or lower helix. Remarkably, an analogous process, if carried out in an intermolecular manner between two SL1 monomers, naturally leads to isomerization and duplex formation most likely through a previously proposed quadruplex-like intermediate39 (Fig. 3e). Here, bulged out G28 and G29 can invade base-pairs in the upper or lower helix in another monomer to generate ES1- or ES2-like inter-molecular base-pairs (Fig. 3e). The bulged out G26 and A25 or C30 and G31 can in turn carry out further inter-molecular strand invasions, and this process can be repeated to generate a duplex dimer (Fig. 3e). In support of this important role for ES1 and ES2 in SL1 isomerization, mutations that trap ES1 or inhibit formation of ES2 significantly diminish the rate of isomerization, whereas control sequences that preserve the stability of the stem-loop without disrupting conformational exchange show little to no effect (Fig. 3f and Supplementary Fig. 8). Thus, transitions between the GS and ES can promote ATP-independent changes in RNA secondary structure without disrupting the structural integrity of entire hairpins, which may be required for other functions, such as the formation of kissing dimers in SL1.
Compared to secondary structural transitions observed in many regulatory RNA switches47,48, transitions between the ground and excited states uncovered here involve much more localized changes in RNA structure, occur at rates that are two to four orders of magnitude faster, and do not require assistance from external factors. Thus, they can meet unique demands in biological circuits and macromolecular machines. The ESs also present new drug targets and offer new opportunities in the engineering of RNA-based devices. Line-broadening indicative of ESs is routinely observed in NMR spectra of RNA and we therefore predict that RNA ESs exist in great abundance throughout the transcriptome. By combining NMR data with structure prediction tools, it should be possible to determine the 3D structures of RNA ESs at atomic resolution.
RNA samples were prepared by in vitro transcription using T7 RNA polymerase (Takara Mirus Bio, Inc.), uniformly 13C/15N-labeled nucleotide triphosphates (ISOTEC, Inc., Cambridge Isotope Labs) or unlabeled (Sigma-Aldrich) nucleotide triphosphates, and synthetic DNA templates (Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc.) containing the T7 promoter and sequence of interest. All RNAs were purified by 20 % (w/v) denaturing polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis, using 8M urea and TBE. The RNA was electro-eluted from the gel in 20 mM Tris pH 8 buffer followed by ethanol precipitation. The RNA pellet was dissolved in water, annealed by heating to 95 °C for 10 min. and rapid cooling on ice and exchanged into NMR buffer (15 mM sodium phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 25 mM NaCl at pH 6.4) multiple times using an Amicon Ultra-4 Centrifugal Filter Unit (Millipore Corp.). Unlabeled RNA samples (TAR-C30U, TAR-A35-DMA, TAR-A35G, A-site-ΔU95, A-site-U95-N3M) were purchased from Dharmacon (Thermo Fisher Scientific) and Integrated DNA Technologies and dissolved in NMR buffer (15 mM sodium phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, 25 mM NaCl, pH 6.4). The TAR pH studies employed the following NMR buffers: pH 7.4 (15 mM sodium phosphate, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 25 mM NaCl) and pH 4.6 (15 mM acetate-d4, 0.1 mM EDTA, and 25 mM NaCl). Resonance assignments of wt RNA samples were obtained from prior studies16,45,49 and confirmed using standard resonance assignment experiments.
All relaxation dispersion NMR experiments were performed on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz NMR spectrometer equipped with a 5 mm triple-resonance cryogenic probe. Experiments were performed at 25 °C, 25/15 °C, and 15 °C for TAR, A-site and SL1m, respectively, using uniformly 13C/15N labeled RNA constructs shown in Supplementary Fig. 1. For TAR, we used a second construct lacking the bulge (EII-TAR, Supplementary Fig. 1) to measure dispersion data for U31-C6 resonance, which is otherwise overlapped. For A-site, all data was measured at 25 °C with the exception of A92-C2 and A93-C8, which was measured at 15°C to push the system into slower exchange and obtain more reliable data. Rotating frame carbon R1ρ relaxation dispersion9 data was measured using a 1D acquisition scheme that extends the sensitivity to chemical exchange into millisecond timescales relative to conventional 2D relaxation dispersion methods9–11. On- and off-resonance relaxation dispersion data was recorded at various offset frequencies (Ω) and spinlock powers (ω1) (see Supplementary Table 2). The following relaxation delays were used. TAR: C30, U31, G34, and A35 C1′ [0, 6 (2X), 14, 24 (2X) ms]; G32 C1′ [0, 12 (2X), 30, 50 (2X) ms]; G33 C1′ [0, 14 (2X), 34, 55 (2X) ms]; U31 C6 (measured on EII-TAR) [0, 7 (2X), 14, 28 (2X) ms]; G32 and A35 C8 [0, 10 (2X), 21, 34, 45, 55 (2X) ms]; G33 C8 [0, 8 (2X), 20, 35 (2X) ms]; G34 C8 [0, 5 (2X), 11, 20 (2X) ms]. A-site: G05C8, G91C1′[0, 8, 16, 30, 36 (2X) ms], A92C1′/C2/C8, G94C: [0, 8, 16, 24, 32 (2X) ms], A93C1′, U95C6 [0, 4, 8, 14, 20 (2X) ms], A93C8 [0, 8, 22, 34, 44 (2X) ms] and C96C6 [0, 8, 18, 24 ms]. SL1m: A3C2 [0, 8 (2X), 10 ms], G7C8 [0, 8 (2X), 16 ms], G8C8 [0, 3.3 (2X), 5 ms], U9C6 [0, 7 (2X), 12 ms], A24C8 [0, 9 (2X), 12 ms], A24C2 [0, 12, 16 (2X) ms], A25C8 [0, 10, 14 (2X) ms], A25C2 [0, 8 (2X), 12 ms], G26C8 [0, 1.5, 5 (2X), 17 ms], G26C1′ [0, 12 (2X) ms], A27C8 [0, 4, 10, 17, 25 (2X) ms], A27C2 [0, 4, 10, 17, 25 (2X) ms], G28C8 [0, 11, 14 (2X) ms], G28C1′ [0, 7 (2X), 9 ms], G29C8 [0, 6, 8 (2X) ms], G29C1′ [0, 7 (2X) ms], C30C6 [0, 5 (2X), 14 ms], G31C8 [0.3, 11 (2X), 15 ms], A32C8, U34C6 A32C2, [0, 10 (2X), 15 ms], and G33C8 [0, 12 (2X), 15 ms].
Data points that meet C-C Hartmann-Hahn matching conditions were omitted from analysis as previously described9. Data were processed using nmrPipe50 and the R1ρ values were computed by fitting the resonance intensities with mono-exponential decays using Mathematica 6.0 script51 (Wolfram Research, Inc., Champaign, IL). The relaxation dispersion data was fitted1 to fast exchange (Eq. 1, 3 independent variables), asymmetric exchange (Eq. 2, 5 independent variables), and the Laguerre equation (Eq. 3, 5 independent variables) using Origin 8.5.1 (OriginLab):
Fast exchange (kex ≫ Δω):
Asymetric exchange (pGS ≫ pES):
Laguerre equation (general):
R1 and R2 are the intrinsic longitudinal and transverse relaxation rates, respectively, (assumed to be identical for GS and ES); Ω = Ωobs − ωrf is the offset of the spinlock carrier frequency (ωrf) from the averaged resonance frequency (Ωobs);ωeff is the effective spinlock strength; θ = arctan(ω1/Ω);Ωobs = pGSΩGS + pESΩES, where pGS (pES) is the ground (excited) state fractional population (pGS + pES = 1); kex = k1 + k−1 is the exchange rate constant for a two-state equilibrium, where k1 = pES*kex and k−1 = pGS*kex are the forward and reverse rate constants, respectively. Note that while for pES <2%, Ωobs ~ ΩGS, this is not the case for significantly populated ESs, such as TAR and SL1m-ES1 (~13 %, and 9 %, respectively).
Model selection was carried out using an F-test (Supplementary Table 1), which uses chi-square (χ2), applying the Levenberg–Marquardt minimization algorithm, to determine the feasibility of a model (e.g. individual fits) versus a more complex model (i.e. shared-parameter/3-state fits, number of independent variables equal number of reported parameters) expanded from the first model. In general, similar Δω values were obtained when fitting dispersion data using asymmetric (Eq. 2) and Laguerre (Eq. 3) equations. Errors were determined using standard Monte Carlo simulations52 and verified using Boot strapping approaches for error analysis52,53 (data not shown). For TAR, all fast exchanging resonances were combined in a global fit except U31-C6. For A-site, four resonances (G91-C1′, A92-C1′, U95-C6, C96-C6) can be globally fitted according to the F-test and the remaining resonances (G05-C8, A92-C8, G94-C8) can be included into the global fit without affecting the resulting fitted parameters (values are within error when globally fitting four or seven resonances). A-site data measured at 15 °C were fitted individually though similar Δω values were obtained when fitting including these data in global fits with other data measured at 15 °C. The Δω values obtained from both individual and global fits are shown for A92-C2 in Supplementary Fig. 5. For SL1, the G26-C8, A25-C8 and A25-C2 were combined in a global fit to characterize ES1, and G31-C8, C30-C6 and G7-C8 were combined in a global fit to characterize ES2. G28-C8, G28-C1′ and G29-C8 were included in a global fit to ES1 and ES2 using a three-state model. A27-C8 and G8-C8 were fitted individually using single and three-state exchange models. Δω values obtained for dispersion profiles with Rex <5 Hz or that yielded ambiguous signs for Δω during the Monte-Carlo error analysis were deemed unreliable (these include A-site: G05-C1′, U06-C1′, U06-C6, C07-C1′ and A08-C2; SL1m: G29-C1′ and G26-C1′). The sign of Δω for TAR U31-C6 was deduced from the pH-dependent perturbations. Data that failed the above criteria but that could be included in global fitting as judged using an F-test were included in the global fitting (TAR: C30-C1′) or individually fitted assuming kex and pES values determined by globally fitting the dispersion data (SL1m: C30-C6 and G7-C8 and TAR: U31-C6).
The free energy difference between the GS and ES (ΔGES) and between the GS and transition state (ΔGTS) was computed using (with ΔGGS = 0):
SL1 isomerization assays were performed closely following the procedure described previously40. Briefly, SL1 RNA samples (SL1, SL1-G8C, SL1-tGC, SL1-eGC) (Fig. 1e and Supplementary Fig. 8) containing the wild-type apical loop were purchased from Integrated DNA Technologies, Inc. RNA samples were dissolved in water to a concentration of 5 μM, heated to 95 °C for 3 min. and placed on ice for 30 min. Subsequently, 50 % (v/v) 2X dimerization buffer (20 mM sodium phosphate, pH 6.4, 100 mM NaCl, and 0.2 mM MgCl2) was added to produce a final RNA concentration of 2.5 μM, and the sample incubated at 55 °C or on ice for a variable amount of time. Native gels were run using TBE buffer and control with TBM as previously described40 and detected with ethidium bromide staining.
All RNA secondary structures were predicted based on sequence using the program MC-Fold24, (http://www.major.iric.ca/MC-Fold/) with standard input options.
FN5Full Methods and associated references are available in the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
FN6Supplementary Information is linked to the online version of the paper at www.nature.com/nature.
FN7Author Contributions H.M.A., E.A.D., K.P., and J.C conceived the approaches to structurally characterize RNA ES and wrote the paper. E.A.D. and K.P. performed all experiments and data analyses for HIV TAR and SL1m, respectively. J.C. with assistance from A.C.-N. performed all experiments and data analyses for A-site.
FN8Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints. H.M.A. declares competing conflict of financial interest. H.M.A. is an advisor to and holds an ownership interest in Nymirum Inc., which is an RNA-based drug discovery company. The research reported in this article was performed by the University of Michigan faculty and students and was funded by an NIH contract to H.M.A.
We thank members of the Al-Hashimi lab for input. We acknowledge the Michigan Economic Development Cooperation and the Michigan Technology Tri-Corridor for the support of the purchase of 600 MHz spectrometer. K.P. is supported by postdoctoral Fellowship from the Swedish Research Council (VR-K2011-78PK-21662-0-12). This work was supported by the US National Institutes of Health (R01 AI066975) and by a Rackham Graduate Student Research Grant awarded by the University of Michigan.
|1.||Palmer AG,Massi F. Characterization of the dynamics of biomacromolecules using rotating-frame spin relaxation NMR spectroscopyChem Rev10617001719Year: 200616683750|
|2.||Baldwin AJ,Hansen DF,Vallurupalli P,Kay LE. Measurement of methyl axis orientations in invisible, excited states of proteins by relaxation dispersion NMR spectroscopyJ Am Chem Soc131Year: 2009|
|3.||Neudecker P,et al. Structure of an intermediate state in protein folding and aggregationScience336362366Year: 201222517863|
|4.||Henzler-Wildman K,Kern D. Dynamic personalities of proteinsNature450Year: 2007|
|5.||Sugase K,Dyson HJ,Wright PE. Mechanism of coupled folding and binding of an intrinsically disordered proteinNature44710211025Year: 200717522630|
|6.||Korzhnev DM,Religa TL,Banachewicz W,Fersht AR,Kay LE. A transient and low-populated protein-folding intermediate at atomic resolutionScience329Year: 2010|
|7.||Li P,Martins IRS,Amarasinghe GK,Rosen MK. Internal dynamics control activation and activity of the autoinhibited Vav DH domainNature Struct Biol15613618Year: 2008|
|8.||Boehr DD,McElheny D,Dyson HJ,Wright PE. The Dynamic Energy Landscape of Dihydrofolate Reductase CatalysisScience313Year: 2006|
|9.||Hansen AL,Nikolova EN,Casiano-Negroni A,Al-Hashimi HM. Extending the range of microsecond-to-millisecond chemical exchange detected in labeled and unlabeled nucleic acids by selective carbon R(1rho) NMR spectroscopyJ Am Chem Soc13138183819Year: 200919243182|
|10.||Massi F,Johnson E,Wang C,Rance M,Palmer AG. NMR R1rho rotating-frame relaxation with weak radio frequency fieldsJ Am Chem Soc126Year: 2004|
|11.||Korzhnev DM,Orekhov VY,Kay LE. Off-Resonance R1ρ NMR Studies of Exchange Dynamics in Proteins with Low Spin-Lock Fields: An Application to a Fyn SH3 DomainJ Am Chem Soc127713721Year: 200515643897|
|12.||Nikolova EN,et al. Transient Hoogsteen base pairs in canonical duplex DNANature470498Year: 201121270796|
|13.||Hoogstraten CG,Wank JR,Pardi A. Active site dynamics in the lead-dependent ribozymeBiochemistry3999519958Year: 200010933815|
|14.||Johnson JE,Hoogstraten CG. Extensive Backbone Dynamics in the GCAA RNA Tetraloop Analyzed Using C-13 NMR Spin Relaxation and Specific Isotope LabelingJ Am Chem Soc1301675716769Year: 200819049467|
|15.||Blad H,Reiter NJ,Abildgaard F,Markley JL,Butcher SE. Dynamics and metal ion binding in the U6 RNA intramolecular stem-loop as analyzed by NMRJ Mol Biol353540555Year: 200516181635|
|16.||Dethoff EA,et al. Characterizing complex dynamics in the transactivation response element apical loop and motional correlations with the bulge by NMR, molecular dynamics, and mutagenesisBiophysical J9539063915Year: 2008|
|17.||Bannwarth S,Gatignol A. HIV-1 TAR RNA: the target of molecular interactions between the virus and its hostCurr HIV Res36171Year: 200515638724|
|18.||Jaeger JA,Tinoco I Jr. An NMR study of the HIV-1 TAR element hairpinBiochemistry3212522Year: 19938241143|
|19.||Kulinski T,et al. The apical loop of the HIV-1 TAR RNA hairpin is stabilized by a cross-loop base pairJ Biol Chem2783889238901Year: 200312882959|
|20.||Fares C,Amata I,Carlomagno T. 13C-detection in RNA bases: revealing structure-chemical shift relationshipsJ Am Chem Soc1291581415823Year: 200718052161|
|21.||Ghose R,Marino JP,Wiberg KB,Prestegard JH. Dependence of C-13 Chemical-Shifts On Glycosidic Torsional Angles in Ribonucleic-AcidsJ Am Chem Soc11688278828Year: 1994|
|22.||Nozinovic S,Furtig B,Jonker HR,Richter C,Schwalbe H. High-resolution NMR structure of an RNA model system: the 14-mer cUUCGg tetraloop hairpin RNANucleic Acids Res38683694Year: 201019906714|
|23.||Snoussi K,Leroy J-L. Imino proton exchange and base-pair kinetics in RNA duplexesBiochemistry4088988904Year: 200111467951|
|24.||Parisien M,Major F. The MC-Fold and MC-Sym pipeline infers RNA structure from sequence dataNature4525155Year: 200818322526|
|25.||Legault P,Pardi A. Unusual Dynamics and pKa Shift at the Active Site of a Lead-Dependent RibozymeJ Am Chem Soc11966216628Year: 1997|
|26.||Feng S,Holland EC. HIV-1 tat trans-activation requires the loop sequence within tarNature334165167Year: 19883386755|
|27.||Berkhout B,Jeang KT. trans activation of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 is sequence specific for both the single-stranded bulge and loop of the trans-acting-responsive hairpin: a quantitative analysisJ Virol6355015504Year: 19892479775|
|28.||Richter S,Cao H,Rana TM. Specific HIV-1 TAR RNA loop sequence and functional groups are required for human cyclin T1-Tat-TAR ternary complex formationBiochemistry4163916397Year: 200212009901|
|29.||Yoshizawa S,Fourmy D,Puglisi J. Recognition of the codon-anticodon helix by ribosomal RNAScience28517221725Year: 199910481006|
|30.||Schmeing TM,Ramakrishnan V. What recent ribosome structures have revealed about the mechanism of translationNature46112341242Year: 200919838167|
|31.||Shandrick S,et al. Monitoring Molecular Recognition of the Ribosomal Decoding SiteAngew Chem Int Ed4331773182Year: 2004|
|32.||Fourmy D,Recht M,Blanchard S,Puglisi J. Structure of the A site of Escherichia coli 16S ribosomal RNA complexed with an aminoglycoside antibioticScience27413671371Year: 19968910275|
|33.||Romanowska J,Setny P,Trylska J. Molecular dynamics study of the ribosomal A-siteJ Phys Chem B1121522715243Year: 200818973356|
|34.||O’Connor M,Thomas CL,Zimmermann RA,Dahlberg AE. Decoding fidelity at the ribosomal A and P sites: influence of mutations in three different regions of the decoding domain in 16S rRNANucleic Acids Res2511851193Year: 19979092628|
|35.||Dahlquist KD,Puglisi JD. Interaction of translation initiation factor IF1 with the E. coli ribosomal A siteJ Mol Biol299115Year: 200010860719|
|36.||Kipper K,Hetényi C,Sild S,Remme J,Liiv A. Ribosomal intersubunit bridge B2a is involved in factor-dependent translation initiation and translational processivityJ Mol Biol385405422Year: 200919007789|
|37.||Moore MD,Hu W-S. HIV-1 RNA dimerization: It takes two to tangoAIDS reviews1191102Year: 200919529749|
|38.||Clever JL,Parslow TG. Mutant human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomes with defects in RNA dimerization or encapsidationJ Virol7134073414Year: 19979094610|
|39.||Rist MJ,Marino JP. Mechanism of nucleocapsid protein catalyzed structural isomerization of the dimerization initiation site of HIV-1Biochemistry411476214770Year: 200212475224|
|40.||Mujeeb A,et al. Nucleocapsid protein-mediated maturation of dimer initiation complex of full-length SL1 stemloop of HIV-1: sequence effects and mechanism of RNA refoldingNucleic Acids Res3520262034Year: 200717341460|
|41.||Turner KB,Hagan NA,Fabris D. Understanding the isomerization of the HIV-1 dimerization initiation domain by the nucleocapsid proteinJ Mol Biol369812828Year: 200717466332|
|42.||Takahashi K,et al. Structural requirement for the two-step dimerization of human immunodeficiency virus type 1 genomeRNA696102Year: 200010668802|
|43.||Sun X,Zhang Q,Al-Hashimi HM. Resolving fast and slow motions in the internal loop containing stem-loop 1 of HIV-1 that are modulated by Mg2+ binding: role in the kissing-duplex structural transitionNucleic Acids Res3516981713Year: 200717311812|
|44.||Yuan Y,Kerwood DJ,Paoletti AC,Shubsda MF,Borer PN. Stem of SL1 RNA in HIV-1: structure and nucleocapsid protein binding for a 1 x 3 internal loopBiochemistry4252595269Year: 200312731867|
|45.||Lawrence DC,Stover CC,Noznitsky J,Wu Z,Summers MF. Structure of the intact stem and bulge of HIV-1 Psi-RNA stem-loop SL1J Mol Biol326529542Year: 200312559920|
|46.||Ulyanov NB. NMR Structure of the Full-length Linear Dimer of Stem-Loop-1 RNA in the HIV-1 Dimer Initiation SiteJ Biol Chem2811616816177Year: 200616603544|
|47.||Breaker RR. Prospects for riboswitch discovery and analysisMol Cell43867879Year: 201121925376|
|48.||Dethoff EA,Chugh J,Mustoe AM,Al-Hashimi HM. Functional complexity and regulation through RNA dynamicsNature482322330Year: 201222337051|
|49.||Fourmy D,Yoshizawa S,Puglisi JD. Paromomycin binding induces a local conformational change in the A-site of 16 S rRNAJ Mol Biol277333345Year: 19989514734|
|50.||DELAGLIO F,et al. Nmrpipe - a Multidimensional Spectral Processing System Based on Unix PipesJ Biomol NMR6277293Year: 19958520220|
|51.||Spyracopoulos L. A suite of Mathematica notebooks for the analysis of protein main chain 15N NMR relaxation dataJ Biomol NMR36215224Year: 200617061025|
|52.||Meinhold DW,Wright PE. Measurement of protein unfolding/refolding kinetics and structural characterization of hidden intermediates by NMR relaxation dispersionPNAS10890789083Year: 201121562212|
|53.||Vallurupalli P,Bouvignies G,Kay LE. Increasing the Exchange Time-Scale That Can Be Probed by CPMG Relaxation Dispersion NMRJ Phys Chem BYear: 2011|
Previous Document: Vibrational spectra and factor group analysis of M(0.50)TiOPO(4) oxyphosphates (M=Mg, Zn, Ni, Co, Fe...
Next Document: Intrinsically determined cell death of developing cortical interneurons.