Document Detail


Visual Evoked Potentials in Interictal Migraine: No Confirmation of Abnormal Habituation.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23298223     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE.-: We intended to study the effect of check size on visual evoked potential habituation in interictal migraine, using the faster 3 per second reversal rate and an improved analytic procedure with block-number blinding. BACKGROUND.-: Habituation in migraineurs has been extensively studied with visual evoked potentials. Despite discrepant results, possibly related to the use of different stimulus conditions, lack of habituation in the period between attacks is presently considered to be a neurophysiological hallmark of migraine. METHODS.-: Midoccipital monocular visual evoked potentials were recorded and analyzed in 27 interictal migraineurs and 34 healthy controls using a blinded study design. Small 8' checks and large 65' checks were applied in random order, both with 3 reversals per second. Six consecutive blocks of 100 responses were recorded for each check size. N70-P100 and P100-N145 peak-to-peak amplitudes were measured. Regression slopes across the 6 blocks, supplemented by last block/first block ratio and repeated measures analysis of variance with amplitude as the dependent variable, were used to test for habituation. RESULTS.-: N70-P100 habituation to small and large checks was observed in controls (mean slope -0.30 and -0.11 μV/block) and interictal migraineurs (-0.32 and -0.26 μV/block). P100-N145 habituation to small checks in controls (mean slope -0.39 μV/block) and to small and large checks in interictal migraineurs (-0.38 and -0.17 μV/block) was also observed. None of the habituation measures were significantly different between healthy controls and migraineurs (F < 1.6, P > .18). The check-size effect was similar in the 2 groups (F < 2.3, P > .14). CONCLUSION.-: Reversal rate and check-size differences do not seem to explain the discrepant visual evoked potential habituation results in the migraine literature. Furthermore, no differences in first block amplitudes or N70, P100, and N145 latencies between healthy controls and migraineurs were found. We recommend blinded evaluation designs in future habituation studies in migraine.
Authors:
Petter M Omland; Kristian B Nilsen; Martin Uglem; Gøril Gravdahl; Mattias Linde; Knut Hagen; Trond Sand
Related Documents :
11750993 - Central oxytocin potentiates excitatory responses of oxytocin neurones to stimulation o...
15240403 - Gabaergic mechanisms constraining the activity of the hypothalamo-pituitary-adrenocorti...
2073953 - Dual projections of secondary vestibular axons in the medial longitudinal fasciculus to...
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2013-1-8
Journal Detail:
Title:  Headache     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1526-4610     ISO Abbreviation:  Headache     Publication Date:  2013 Jan 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-9     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  2985091R     Medline TA:  Headache     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
© 2013 American Headache Society.
Affiliation:
Department of Neuroscience, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Active site loop dynamics of a class IIa fructose 1,6-bisphosphate aldolase from M. tuberculosis.
Next Document:  Role of AMP-activated protein kinase in adipose tissue metabolism and inflammation.