| Vibrotactile Sensory Substitution for Object Manipulation: Amplitude Versus Pulse Train Frequency Modulation. | |
| | |
MedLine Citation:
|
PMID: 21997322 Owner: NLM Status: Publisher |
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
|
Incorporating sensory feedback with prosthetic devices is now possible, but the optimal methods of providing such feedback are still unknown. The relative utility of amplitude and pulse train frequency modulated stimulation paradigms for providing vibrotactile feedback for object manipulation was assessed in 10 participants. The two approaches were studied during virtual object manipulation using a robotic interface as a function of presentation order and a simultaneous cognitive load. Despite the potential pragmatic benefits associated with pulse train frequency modulated vibrotactile stimulation, comparison of the approach with amplitude modulation indicates that amplitude modulation vibrotactile stimulation provides superior feedback for object manipulation. |
| | |
Authors:
|
C Stepp; Y Matsuoka |
Publication Detail:
|
Type: JOURNAL ARTICLE Date: 2011-10-13 |
Journal Detail:
|
Title: IEEE transactions on neural systems and rehabilitation engineering : a publication of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society Volume: - ISSN: 1558-0210 ISO Abbreviation: - Publication Date: 2011 Oct |
Date Detail:
|
Created Date: 2011-10-14 Completed Date: - Revised Date: - |
Medline Journal Info:
|
Nlm Unique ID: 101097023 Medline TA: IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng Country: - |
Other Details:
|
Languages: ENG Pagination: - Citation Subset: - |
Export Citation:
|
APA/MLA Format Download EndNote Download BibTex |
| MeSH Terms | |
Descriptor/Qualifier:
|
|
From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine
Previous Document: Improving Motor Imagery Classification with a new BCI design using neuro-fuzzy S-dFasArt.
Next Document: Detecting the onset of urinary bladder contractions using an implantable pressure sensor.