Document Detail


Veterinary opinions on refusing euthanasia: justifications and philosophical frameworks.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21498175     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
To obtain information on euthanasia decisions from practising veterinary surgeons, respondents were asked to estimate how often during their time in practice they had refused to euthanase a dog and how often they had wanted to refuse to euthanase a dog but not done so because of other pressures. For each, respondents were then asked to state their most common reasons for refusing/not refusing in free text. The responses of clinicians were considered in the light of established ethical concepts to produce an evidence-based ethical framework for decision making. In total, 58 practitioners responded. Common reasons given for decisions on whether to refuse euthanasia referred to the patient's interests, such as the possibility of treatment or rehoming, and the fear of other unacceptable outcomes for the dog. Other reasons were based on concern for owners' interests. Some respondents reported being pressured into euthanasia by clients and other veterinary surgeons. This gives insight into the ethical principles that explicitly underlie veterinary surgeons' euthanasia decisions and the resultant framework may be useful for discussing and teaching euthanasia.
Authors:
J W Yeates; D C J Main
Related Documents :
21518025 - Current issues in the clinical management of invasive aspergillosis - the agiho, dmykg,...
21135025 - Contradictions from the enlightenment roots of transhumanism.
21241345 - Expertise, wisdom and moral philosophers: a response to gesang.
21266895 - Addressing impairment in a colleague.
17836705 - Astronomers watch the stars come out in berkeley.
16144145 - Gene therapy: no new ethical issues.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article     Date:  2011-02-28
Journal Detail:
Title:  The Veterinary record     Volume:  168     ISSN:  2042-7670     ISO Abbreviation:  Vet. Rec.     Publication Date:  2011 Mar 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-04-18     Completed Date:  2011-06-20     Revised Date:  2012-05-10    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  0031164     Medline TA:  Vet Rec     Country:  England    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  263     Citation Subset:  IM    
Affiliation:
Department of Clinical Veterinary Science, University of Bristol, Myrtle Cottage, Stock Lane, Langford, Bristol BS40 5EW. james.yeates@bristol.ac.uk
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Animal Welfare
Animals
Animals, Domestic
Bonding, Human-Pet
Cats
Decision Making
Dogs
Ethics, Professional*
Euthanasia, Animal / ethics*
Housing, Animal
Humans
Ownership
Physician's Practice Patterns*
Public Opinion
Veterinarians / ethics*,  psychology*

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Meningovascular neurosyphilis as the cause of ischemic cerebrovascular disease in a young man.
Next Document:  Prognosis of acute kidney injury in dogs using RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss and End-stage rena...