Document Detail


Verification of in situ thresholds and integrated real-ear measurements.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21376007     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
BACKGROUND: Accurate prescriptive gain results in a more accurate fit, lower return rate in hearing aids, and increased patient satisfaction. In situ threshold measurements can be used to determine required gain. The Widex Corporation uses an in situ threshold measurement strategy, called the Sensogram. Real-ear measurements determine if prescriptive gain targets have been achieved. Starkey Laboratories introduced an integrated real-ear measurement system in their hearing aids.
PURPOSE: To determine whether the responses obtained using the Widex Sensogram were equivalent to those obtained using current clinical threshold measurement methods. To determine the accuracy of the Starkey IREMS™ (Integrated Real Ear Measurement System) in measuring RECD (real-ear to coupler difference) values compared to a dedicated real-ear measurement system.
RESEARCH DESIGN: A verification design was employed by comparing participant data measured from standard, benchmark equipment and procedures against new techniques offered by hearing-aid manufacturers.
STUDY SAMPLE: A total of 20 participants participated in this study. Ten participants with sensorineural hearing loss were recruited from the Ohio University Hearing, Speech, and Language Clinic participated in the first experiment. Ten participants with normal hearing were recruited from the student population at Ohio University participated in both experiments. The normal-hearing group had thresholds of 15 dB HL or better at the octave frequencies of 250-8000 Hz. The hearing-impaired group had thresholds of varying degrees and configurations with thresholds equal to or poorer than 25 dB HL three-frequency pure-tone average.
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: The order of measurement method for both experiments was counterbalanced. In Experiment 1, thresholds obtained via the Widex Sensogram were compared to thresholds obtained for each participant using a clinical audiometer and ER-3A insert ear phones. In Experiment 2, RECD values obtained via the Starkey IREMS were compared to RECD values obtained via the Audioscan Verifit™. A repeated-measures analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used for statistical analysis, and a Fisher's LSD (least significant difference) was used as a post hoc analysis tool.
RESULTS: A significant difference between Sensogram thresholds and conventional audiometric thresholds was found with the Sensogram method resulting in better threshold values at 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 kHz for both groups. In Experiment 2, a significant difference between RECD values obtained by the Starkey IREMS and the Audioscan Verifit system was found with significant differences in RECD values found at 0.25, 0.5, 0.75, 1.5, 2.0, and 6.0 kHz.
CONCLUSIONS: The Sensogram data differ significantly from traditional audiometry at several frequencies important for speech intelligibility. Real-ear measures are still required for verification of prescribed gain, however, calling into question any claims of shortened fitting time. The Starkey IREMS does perform real-ear measurements that vary significantly from benchmark equipment. These technologies represent a positive direction in prescribing accurate gain during hearing-aid fittings, but a stand-alone system is still the preferred method for real-ear measurements in hearing-aid fittings.
Authors:
Jeffrey J Digiovanni; Ryan M Pratt
Related Documents :
11574887 - Lagged effects of ocean climate change on fulmar population dynamics.
25200177 - Torques do not influence proprioceptive localization of the hand.
20978207 - Tropical mid-tropospheric co2 variability driven by the madden-julian oscillation.
17553637 - Biogeography and adaptation of notothenioid fish: hemoglobin function and globin-gene e...
1779157 - The function of the abductor pollicis longus muscle as a joint stabiliser.
8964927 - Applicability of the l(eq) as a damage-risk criterion: an animal experiment.
Publication Detail:
Type:  Clinical Trial; Comparative Study; Journal Article; Validation Studies    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American Academy of Audiology     Volume:  21     ISSN:  1050-0545     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Acad Audiol     Publication Date:    2010 Nov-Dec
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-03-07     Completed Date:  2011-04-07     Revised Date:  2011-06-14    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9114646     Medline TA:  J Am Acad Audiol     Country:  Canada    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  663-70     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
American Academy of Audiology.
Affiliation:
Communication Sciences and Disorders, Ohio University, Athens, OH, USA. digiovan@ohio.edu
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Audiometry / instrumentation*,  standards*
Auditory Threshold*
Female
Hearing Aids*
Hearing Loss, Sensorineural / diagnosis*,  therapy
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Reproducibility of Results
Young Adult
Comments/Corrections
Comment In:
J Am Acad Audiol. 2011 Apr;22(4):242-3; author reply 243-4   [PMID:  21586259 ]

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  A clinical protocol for predicting outcomes with an implantable prosthetic device (baha) in patients...
Next Document:  Characterization of side reactions during the annealing of small interfering RNAs.