Document Detail

Ventricular flutter induced during electrophysiologic studies in patients with old myocardial infarction: clinical and electrophysiologic predictors, and prognostic significance.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  12950532     Owner:  NLM     Status:  MEDLINE    
INTRODUCTION: Induction of ventricular flutter during electrophysiologic (EP) studies (similar to that of ventricular fibrillation [VF]) often is viewed as a nonspecific response with limited prognostic significance. However, data supporting this dogma originate from patients without previously documented ventricular tachyarrhythmias. We examined the significance of ventricular flutter in patients with and without spontaneous ventricular arrhythmias. METHODS AND RESULTS: We conducted a cohort study of all patients with myocardial infarction (MI) undergoing EP studies at our institution. Of 344 consecutive patients, 181 had previously documented spontaneous sustained ventricular arrhythmias, 61 had suspected ventricular arrhythmias, and 102 had neither. Ventricular flutter was induced in 65 (19%) of the patients. Left ventricular ejection fraction was highest among patients with inducible VF (35 +/- 13), lowest for patients with inducible sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (SMVT; 27 +/- 9), and intermediate for patients with inducible ventricular flutter (30 +/- 10). Similarly, the coupling intervals needed to induce the arrhythmia were shortest for VF (200 +/- 28 msec), intermediate for ventricular flutter (209 +/- 27 msec), and longest for SMVT (230 +/- 35 msec). During 5 +/- 8 years of follow-up, the risk for ventricular tachycardia/VF was high for patients with SMVT and ventricular flutter and low for patients with inducible VF and noninducible patients (46%, 34%, 17%, and 14%, P < 0.005). CONCLUSION: Patients with inducible ventricular flutter appear to be "intermediate" between patients with inducible VF and patients with SMVT in terms of clinical and electrophysiologic correlates. However, the prognostic value of inducible ventricular flutter is comparable to that of SMVT.
Sami Viskin; Maya Ish-Shalom; Edward Koifman; Uri Rozovski; David Zeltser; Aharon Glick; Ariel Finkelstein; Amir Halkin; Roman Fish; Bernard Belhassen
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology     Volume:  14     ISSN:  1045-3873     ISO Abbreviation:  J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol.     Publication Date:  2003 Sep 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2003-09-02     Completed Date:  2004-03-17     Revised Date:  2010-03-23    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  9010756     Medline TA:  J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  913-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Department of Cardiology, Tel Aviv-Sourasky Medical Center, Sackler-School of Medicine, Tel Aviv University, Weizman 6, Tel Aviv 64239, Israel.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Cohort Studies
Electrophysiologic Techniques, Cardiac*
Follow-Up Studies
Middle Aged
Myocardial Infarction / complications*
Predictive Value of Tests
Risk Assessment
Stroke Volume
Tachycardia, Ventricular / complications,  etiology
Ventricular Fibrillation / complications*,  etiology*
Ventricular Function, Left

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Automatic external defibrillators for prevention of out-of-hospital sudden death: effectiveness of t...
Next Document:  Combined head-up tilt and lower body negative pressure as an experimental model of orthostatic synco...