Document Detail


Variability in study withdrawal rates among academic neuroradiologists participating in a radiology utilization management program.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  21962787     Owner:  NLM     Status:  In-Data-Review    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to analyze variability in study withdrawal rates among academic neuroradiologists participating in a utilization management (UM) program.
METHODS: The activities of 5 academic neuroradiologists participating in a UM program were assessed. The project period spanned 42 months. Participating neuroradiologists received identical training and used identical rule sets to evaluate the appropriateness of outpatient CT and MRI studies. Neuroradiologists could approve studies on the basis of available electronic data or contact referring physicians for further information. The rate of withdrawals (defined as "study not performed by consensus" or "study changed by consensus" with the referring physician) was compared among the neuroradiologists.
RESULTS: A total of 5,256 studies were reviewed (mean, 1,051; median, 1,043). There were 573 studies (10.9%) not performed by consensus and 298 studies (5.7%) changed by consensus, resulting in a total of 871 withdrawals (16.6%). Among the neuroradiologists, withdrawal rates varied by approximately a factor of 2 (mean, 16.5%; median, 15.2%; range, 12.8%-23.5%). Although rate of studies not performed by consensus varied by approximately a factor of 2 (mean, 10.8%; median, 8.1%; range, 7.6%-18.0%), the rate of studies changed by consensus showed little variation (mean, 5.7%; median, 5.5%; range, 4.8%-6.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: Variability in withdrawal rates was related to cases in which referring physicians were asked not to perform studies; there was little variation when referring physicians were asked to change studies. These data imply agreement among the neuroradiologists regarding appropriateness of rule sets but suggest that personality characteristics such as persuasiveness, persistence, and desire for conflict avoidance may play an important role in outcomes.
Authors:
David P Friedman; Nancy S Smith
Related Documents :
1401567 - Preparing clinical preceptors to teach master's-level students in oncology nursing.
19302517 - Clinical practice patterns of canadian couple/marital/family therapists.
18795847 - Assessment of clinical reasoning skills in veterinary students prior to and after the c...
12007157 - Training for prescriptions vs. prescriptions for training: where are we now? where shou...
10262087 - State hazardous waste programs; procedures for revision of state rcra programs--epa. pr...
11027897 - Measuring client clinical progress in therapeutic community treatment. the therapeutic ...
Publication Detail:
Type:  Journal Article    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Journal of the American College of Radiology : JACR     Volume:  8     ISSN:  1558-349X     ISO Abbreviation:  J Am Coll Radiol     Publication Date:  2011 Oct 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-10-03     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  101190326     Medline TA:  J Am Coll Radiol     Country:  United States    
Other Details:
Languages:  eng     Pagination:  716-9     Citation Subset:  IM    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 American College of Radiology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Radiology, Jefferson Medical College and Thomas Jefferson University Hospital, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Introducing medical students to radiology as paid emergency department triage assistants.
Next Document:  Medical imaging data reconciliation, part 2: clinical order entry and imaging report data reconcilia...