Document Detail

Validity and variability in visual assessment of stenosis severity in phantom bifurcation lesions: A survey in experts during the fifth meeting of the european bifurcation club.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  22072537     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Objectives: To investigate the adequacy of visual estimate regarding the percent diameter stenosis (DS) in bifurcation lesions. Background: Quantitative coronary angiography (QCA) is more accurate and precise compared to visual estimate in assessing stenosis severity in single-vessel lesions. Methods: Thirty-six experts in the field of bifurcation PCI visually assessed the DS in cine images of five precision manufactured phantom bifurcation lesions, experts being blinded to the true values. Expert DS estimates were compared with the true values and they were also used to define the Medina class of each individual bifurcation. Results were pooled together both for proximal main vessel (PMV), distal main vessel (DMV) and side-branch (SB) segments and for vessel segments with similar DS values. Results: Individual performance was highly variable among observers; pooled values and range of accuracy and precision were 2.79% (-6.67% to 17.33%) and 8.69% (4.31-16.25%), respectively. On average, DS was underestimated in the PMV (-1.08%, P = 0.10) and overestimated in the DMV (3.86% P < 0.01) and SB segments (5.58%, P < 0.01). Variability in visual estimates was significantly larger in lesions of medium severity compared to the clearly obstructive ones (P < 0.01); the latter were consistently overestimated. Inter-observer agreement was moderate (κ = 0.55) over the entire number of estimates. However, if the segments with true DS = 0% were excluded, agreement was diminished (κ = 0.27). Inter-observer agreement in Medina class was rather low (κ = 0.21). True bifurcation lesions were misclassified as non-true ones in 14/180 estimates. Conclusions: Visual assessment by experts is more variable and less precise in the analysis of bifurcation lesions compared to bifurcation QCA software. © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Chrysafios Girasis; Yoshinobu Onuma; Johan C H Schuurbiers; Marie-Angele Morel; Gerrit-Anne van Es; Robert-Jan van Geuns; Jolanda J Wentzel; Patrick W Serruys;
Related Documents :
8284377 - Ovarian masses: can benign and malignant lesions be differentiated with color and pulse...
9393527 - Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with dynamic and static gadobenate dimeglumine-enh...
12693617 - Utility of sonography for small hepatic lesions found on computed tomography in patient...
8739057 - The screening of tubal abnormalities in the infertile couple.
3993447 - Vegetative dysfunctions of the hypothalamus.
11409797 - Importance of lymphatic mapping in ductal carcinoma in situ (dcis): why map dcis?
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE     Date:  2011-7-6
Journal Detail:
Title:  Catheterization and cardiovascular interventions : official journal of the Society for Cardiac Angiography & Interventions     Volume:  -     ISSN:  1522-726X     ISO Abbreviation:  -     Publication Date:  2011 Jul 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2011-11-10     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  100884139     Medline TA:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  -     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2011 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
Interventional Cardiology, Erasmus MC, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine

Previous Document:  Reasons for underuse of recommended therapies for colorectal and lung cancer in the Veterans Health ...
Next Document:  Molecular Targets of the Antiinflammatory Harpagophytum procumbens (Devil's claw): Inhibition of TNF...