Document Detail


Validity of Different Methods to Prenatal Screening for Down's Syndrom During First and Second Trimester Pregnancy of Chinese-Women.
MedLine Citation:
PMID:  23336131     Owner:  NLM     Status:  Publisher    
Abstract/OtherAbstract:
OBJECTIVE: To identify and determine the optimal method to screening for fetal Down's syndrome (DS). METHODS: Three large cohorts with 17 118, 39 903, 16 646 subjects were enrolled for the first trimester double marker (pregnancy-associated plasma protein A and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin) screening (FTDMS), second trimester double marker (α-fetoprotein and free β-human chorionic gonadotropin) screening (STDMS), and second trimester triple marker (α-fetoprotein, free β-human chorionic gonadotropin and unconjugated estriol 3) screening (STTMS), respectively. The sensitivity, specificity, false positive rate (FPR), false negative rate (FNR) and the areas under ROC curves (AUCs) were estimated in order to determine the optimal screening method in women under or above 35 years old. RESULTS: For women under 35 years old, STTMS was the best method with a detection rate of 68.8% and FPR of 4.3% followed by the STDMS with a detection rate (sensitivity) of 66.7% and FPR of 4.9%. The FTDMS had a lower detection rate of 61.1% and FPR of 6.3%. For women above 35 years old, the detection rate of all the methods was similar, but STTMS method had a lowest FPR of 15.9%. For women under 35 years old AUCs were 0.77 (95% CI, 0.64 to 0.91), 0.81 (95% CI, 0.71 to 0.91), and 0.82 (95% CI, 0.69 to 0.96) for FTDMS, STDMS, and STTMS methods, respectively; for those above 35 years old, AUCs were 0.70 (95% CI, 0.56 to 0.83), 0.70 (95% CI, 0.59 to 0.82), 0.78 (95% CI, 0.58 to 0.97) for FTDMS, STDMS and STTMS , respectively. CONCLUSION: Findings from our study revealed that STDMS is optimal for the detection of fetal DS in pregnant women aged under 35. For individual women, if economic condition permits, STTMS is the best choice, while for women aged above 35, STTMS is the best choice in this regard.
Authors:
Fang Yang; Hua Wang; Jing Cheng Shi; Ming Hu
Publication Detail:
Type:  JOURNAL ARTICLE    
Journal Detail:
Title:  Biomedical and environmental sciences : BES     Volume:  26     ISSN:  0895-3988     ISO Abbreviation:  Biomed. Environ. Sci.     Publication Date:  2013 Feb 
Date Detail:
Created Date:  2013-1-22     Completed Date:  -     Revised Date:  -    
Medline Journal Info:
Nlm Unique ID:  8909524     Medline TA:  Biomed Environ Sci     Country:  -    
Other Details:
Languages:  ENG     Pagination:  87-93     Citation Subset:  -    
Copyright Information:
Copyright © 2013 The Editorial Board of Biomedical and Environmental Sciences. Published by China CDC. All rights reserved.
Affiliation:
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, School of Public Health, Central South University, Changsha 410078, Hunan, China; Department of Molecular Biology, School of Bioscience and Technology, Central South University, Changsha 410078, Hunan, China.
Export Citation:
APA/MLA Format     Download EndNote     Download BibTex
MeSH Terms
Descriptor/Qualifier:

From MEDLINE®/PubMed®, a database of the U.S. National Library of Medicine


Previous Document:  Study on Age and Education Level and Their Relationship with Fall-Related Injuries in Shanghai, Chin...
Next Document:  Body Mass Index and Body Fat Percentage in Assessment of Obesity Prevalence in Saudi Adults.